Part of
Iconicity in Syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–26, 1983Edited by John Haiman
[Typological Studies in Language 6] 1985
► pp. 311–
Edited by John Haiman
[Typological Studies in Language 6] 1985
► pp. 311–
“oats” and “wheat”
the fallacy of arbitrariness
Cited by
Cited by 42 other publications
Akiyama, M. Michael & Nancy Williams
1996. Spatial Components in the Use of Count Nouns Among English Speakers and Japanese Speakers of English as a Second Language. Language Learning 46:2 ► pp. 217 ff. 
Armoskaite, Solveiga
2012. Aspectual effects of a pluractional suffix: Evidence from Lithuanian. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 129 ff.
Bale, Alan C. & David Barner
2012. Semantic triggers, linguistic variation and the mass‐count distinction. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 238 ff.
Batiukova, Olga
2021. Compositional mechanisms and selectional constraints in syntax and word formation. The Linguistic Review 38:2 ► pp. 149 ff.
Cheng, Lisa Lai‐Shen
2012. Counting and classifiers. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 199 ff.
Choi, Sea Hee, Tania Ionin & Yeqiu Zhu
2018. L1 Korean and L1 Mandarin L2 English learners’ acquisition of the count/mass distinction in English. Second Language Research 34:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall
2012. Aspects of individuation. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 27 ff.
Croft, William
1994. Semantic universals in classifier systems. <i>WORD</i> 45:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
2004. Cognitive Linguistics,
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.
2014. Chapter 3. Pluractionality and the distribution of number marking across categories. In Number – Constructions and Semantics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 151], ► pp. 57 ff.
Fasciolo, Marco
2014. Massif/comptable : une opposition arbitraire ou motivée ?. Langue française n° 183:3 ► pp. 41 ff.
García Meseguer, Álvaro
2018. Nombre individuales y colectivos: una propuesta de definición basada en pruebas sintácticas. Revista de Lexicografía 13 ► pp. 17 ff.
Gardelle, Laure
2016. Lexical plurals for aggregates of discrete entities in English.
Lingvisticae Investigationes
39:2 ► pp. 355 ff.
Ghaniabadi, Saeed
2012. Plural marking beyond count nouns. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 112 ff.
Ghomeshi, Jila & Diane Massam
2012. The count mass distinction: Issues and perspectives. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 1 ff.
Grimm, Scott
2012. Individuation and inverse number marking in Dagaare. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 75 ff.
Gulgowski, Piotr, Joanna Błaszczak & Veranika Puhacheuskaya
2021. The influence of aspect on the countability of Polish deverbal nominalizations: Evidence from an acceptability rating study. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 40:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kleiber, Georges
2014. Massif/comptable : d'une problématique à l'autre. Langue française n° 183:3 ► pp. 3 ff.
Kleiber, Georges
2015. Lorsque l’opposition massif / comptable rencontre les noms superordonnés. Travaux de linguistique n° 69:2 ► pp. 11 ff.
Klein, Natalie M., Greg N. Carlson, Renjie Li, T. Florian Jaeger & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2012. Classifying and massifying incrementally in Chinese language comprehension. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 261 ff.
Lammert, Marie
2014. Référence collective massive vs référence plurielle indéfinie. Langue française n° 183:3 ► pp. 87 ff.
Lammert, Marie
2016. Lexical plurals through meronymy and hyperonymy. Lingvisticae Investigationes 39:2 ► pp. 335 ff.
Lauwers, Peter & Marie Lammert
Diane Massam
2012. Count and Mass Across Languages,
Mathieu, Eric
2012. On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 172 ff.
Moore, Harumi
2004. Semantic/pragmatic equivalence through formal and motivational shift. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 32 ff.
Myhill, John
1997. Shouldandought:the rise of individually oriented modality in American English. English Language and Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Paul, Ileana
2012. General number and the structure of DP. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 99 ff.
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry
2012. Lexical nouns are both +mass and +count, but they are neither +mass nor +count. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 9 ff.
Reid, Wallis
2011. The communicative function of English verb number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29:4 ► pp. 1087 ff.
Strik Lievers, Francesca, Marianna Bolognesi & Bodo Winter
2021. The linguistic dimensions of concrete and abstract concepts: lexical category, morphological structure, countability, and etymology. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 641 ff.
Szymańska, Monika
2021. Grammatical metonymy and construal operations. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 465 ff.
Wiese, Heike
2012. Collectives in the intersection of mass and count nouns: A cross‐linguistic account. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 54 ff.
Willim, Ewa
2010. On the form-function dichotomy in linguistic theory. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 127:-1 ► pp. 211 ff.
Wiltschko, Martina
2012. Decomposing the mass/count distinction: Evidence from languages that lack it. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 146 ff.
Zhang, Niina Ning
2012. Countability and numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 220 ff.
[no author supplied]
2000. References. In Discourse and the Continuity of Reference, ► pp. 324 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. 311 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. General Preface. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. The Contributors. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. x ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Abbreviations. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. xv ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Copyright Page. In Count and Mass Across Languages, ► pp. iv ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.