Part of
Non-nominative Subjects: Volume 2
Edited by Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri V. Subbarao
[Typological Studies in Language 61] 2004
► pp. 3356
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Carnesale, Lucrezia
2024. Experiential constructions in Hindi: the encoding of perceptions and bodily sensations. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics DOI logo
Nash, Léa
2022. Nonunitary structure of unergative verbs in Georgian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40:4  pp. 1201 ff. DOI logo
Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis
2017. The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, DOI logo
Dahl, Eystein & Krzysztof Stroński
2016. Ergativity in Indo-Aryan and beyond. In Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language, 112],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Khokhlova, Liudmila V.
2016. Ergative alignment in Western New Indo-Aryan languages from a historical perspective. In Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language, 112],  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Manzini, M. Rita & Ludovico Franco
2016. Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34:1  pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Montaut, Annie
Seržant, Ilja A.
Verbeke, Saartje & Eva De Clercq
2016. Looking for ergativity in Indo-Aryan. In Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language, 112],  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Dillon, Brian, Andrew Nevins, Alison C. Austin & Colin Phillips
2012. Syntactic and semantic predictors of tense in Hindi: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes 27:3  pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Stroński, Krzysztof
2010. Variation of Ergativity Patterns in Indo-Aryan. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46:2 DOI logo
Stroński, Krzysztof
2010. Non-Nominative Subjects in Rajasthani and Central Pahari. The Status of the Ergative and Obligatory Constructions. Lingua Posnaniensis 52:1 DOI logo
Stroński, Krzysztof
2016. Syntactic lability vs. ergativity in Indo-Aryan. In Indo-Aryan Ergativity in Typological and Diachronic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language, 112],  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.