Edited by Dennis Kurzon and Silvia Adler
[Typological Studies in Language 74] 2008
► pp. 171–190
We uphold the position that the French prepositions à and de are not “empty” and do not fulfill only a syntactic function. After showing that the criterion of presupposition, used in some previous work, is not sufficient to differentiate these prepositions, we put forward a pragma-semantic description according to which expressions with à, followed by an infinitival complement, are used when the speaker’s intention is to present a fact in an “ambivalent” way, whereas expressions with de indicate a “monovalent” vision of a fact. We also try to show that the “ambivalent vision” related to the preposition à makes it possible to introduce a particular argumentative value to the statement, indicating a real or a potential opposition of points of view.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.