Identifying formulaic language

Persistent challenges and new opportunities

Alison Wray | Cardiff University, UK

Identifying examples of formulaic language in text is a non-trivial challenge, but the difficulties can be much alleviated by the use of an appropriate definition. Three types of definition are distinguished. Type (i) lays out an analytic working space. Type (ii) derives from an analysis and represents a theoretical position. Type (iii) locates examples for subsequent analysis. Examples of each type are discussed. Extreme examples of formulaicity (pre-memorized material, political slogans and military bugle calls) are then used to explore the boundaries of the definition of formulaicity as morpheme-equivalence. Addressing the question ‘Do formulaic sequences constrain expression?’ reveals the inherent tension between novelty and formulaicity in balancing processing parsimony and the need to respond appropriately in unique communicative events.

Published online: 20 May 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.82.02ide

Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

No author info given

2021. In “All families and genera”,

Alghamdi, Ayman & Eric Atwell

2019. Constructing a corpus-informed list of Arabic formulaic sequences (ArFSs) for language pedagogy and technology. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 202 ff.

Buerki, Andreas

2020. In Formulaic Language and Linguistic Change,

HEINE, BERND, TANIA KUTEVA & GUNTHER KALTENBÖCK

2014. Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: some correlations. Language and Cognition 6:1 ► pp. 146 ff.

Hsieh, Shu-Kai, Chiung-Yu Chiang, Yu-Hsiang Tseng, Bo-Ya Wang, Tai-Li Chou & Chia-Lin Lee

2018. In Chinese Lexical Semantics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10709], ► pp. 576 ff.

Kaltenböck, Gunther

2020. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70], ► pp. 233 ff.

Martinez, Ron & Norbert Schmitt

2012. A Phrasal Expressions List. Applied Linguistics 33:3 ► pp. 299 ff.

Myles, Florence & Caroline Cordier

2017. FORMULAIC SEQUENCE(FS) CANNOT BE AN UMBRELLA TERM IN SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Schulte, Michael

2012. Review of Götzsche (2010): Memory, Mind and Language. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 64-65 ► pp. 227 ff.

Shibasaki, Reijirou

2018. In Explorations in English Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 198], ► pp. 283 ff.

Shibasaki, Reijirou

2018. In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202], ► pp. 333 ff.

Stolk, Joanne Vera & Delphine Nachtergaele

2016. Dative for Accusative Case Interchange in Epistolary Formulas in Greek Papyrus Letters. Symbolae Osloenses 90:1 ► pp. 122 ff.

Villalba Ibañez, Cristina

2018. El infinitivo enunciativo como estrategia atenuante. Spanish in Context 15:2 ► pp. 237 ff.

Wray, Alison

2012. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Wray, Alison

2017. Formulaic Sequences as a Regulatory Mechanism for Cognitive Perturbations During the Achievement of Social Goals. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3 ► pp. 569 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.