Article published in:Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution
Edited by T. Givón and Masayoshi Shibatani
[Typological Studies in Language 85] 2009
► pp. 163–198
Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t
The case of relativization
In their recent work, Hauser, Chomsky and Fitch (2002:1569) suggest that recursion “is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language”. In both generative and typological studies, the relativization site has been considered to be one of the places where recursion of sentences takes place. This paper examines a number of wide-spread patterns of relativization around the globe and argues that what have been identified as relative clauses/sentences are in fact nominalized entities, lacking some crucial properties of both full clauses and sentences. It is furthermore shown that these nominalized forms are neither syntactically nor semantically subordinate to the nominal head they modify.
Published online: 22 April 2009
Cited by 23 other publications
Estevam, Adriana M.
Golluscio, Lucía A., Felipe Hasler & Willem J. de Reuse
Hook, Peter Edwin & Prashant Pardeshi
KIDD, EVAN, ANGEL CHAN & JOIE CHIU
Kishimoto, Hideki, Peter Edwin Hook & Prashant Pardeshi
Otero, Manuel A., Doris L. Payne & Alejandra Vidal
Overall, Simon E.
Overall, Simon E. & Katarzyna I. Wojtylak
Rojas-Berscia, Luis Miguel
Valle, Daniel & Roberto Zariquiey
Yap, Foong Ha & Karen Grunow-Hårsta
Álvarez González, Albert
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.