In their recent work, Hauser, Chomsky and Fitch (2002:1569) suggest that recursion “is the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language”. In both generative and typological studies, the relativization site has been considered to be one of the places where recursion of sentences takes place. This paper examines a number of wide-spread patterns of relativization around the globe and argues that what have been identified as relative clauses/sentences are in fact nominalized entities, lacking some crucial properties of both full clauses and sentences. It is furthermore shown that these nominalized forms are neither syntactically nor semantically subordinate to the nominal head they modify.
2018. From verb to noun and back again: Non-referential uses of nominalizations in Aguaruna (Chicham). STUF - Language Typology and Universals 71:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Overall, Simon E. & Katarzyna I. Wojtylak
2018. Nominalization in Northwest Amazonia: Introduction. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 71:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
2015. Cross-linguistic influence in simultaneous Cantonese–English bilingual children's comprehension of relative clauses. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18:3 ► pp. 438 ff.
Yap, Foong Ha & Karen Grunow‐Hårsta
2010. Non‐Referential Uses of Nominalization Constructions: Asian Perspectives. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:12 ► pp. 1154 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.