The implications of Cognitive Load Theory and exposure to subtitles
in English Foreign Language (EFL)
The pedagogical use of subtitled and captioned material in the foreign language
classroom is upheld by various theories which reveal the cognitive processing
activated when students are exposed to multimedia and subtitled audiovisual
materials. The three theories that will be considered here are Cognitive Load
Theory (CLT), Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) and Cognitive
Affective Theory of Learning with Media (CATLM). The main purpose of the paper
is to illustrate the internal mechanisms triggered in learners when various
sensorial channels (visual, auditory and textual) coincide simultaneously on
screen and how this may affect their cognitive engagement and motivation while
learning a foreign language. Additionally, two empirical studies will be
presented in the second part of the article in order to provide evidence of the
benefits of using subtitled audiovisual materials in the English Foreign
Language (EFL) classroom in higher education. The results show that both
interlingual (L1) and intralingual (L2) subtitles prove to have a facilitating
role in informal and colloquial language learning in this context.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Principles of Cognitive Load Theory
- 3.Cognitive Load Theory and Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning
- 4.The role of motivation in the Cognitive Affective Theory of Learning with Media
- 5.Two empirical studies
- 5.1Methodology
- 5.1.1Participants
- 5.1.2Resources
- 5.2Study 1
- 5.3Study 2
- 6.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References (45)
References
Baddeley, Alan D. 1992. “Working Memory.” Science 255 (5044): 556–59.
Bianchi, Francesca, and Tiziana Ciabattoni. 2008. “Captions and Subtitles in EFL Learning: An Investigative Study in a Comprehensive Computer Environment.” In From Didactas to Ecolingua, ed. by Anthony Baldry, Maria Pavesi, Carol Taylor Torsello, and Christopher Taylor, 69–90. Trieste: EUT – Edizioni Università di Trieste.
Bird, Stephen A., and John N. Williams. 2002. “The Effect of Bimodal Input on Implicit and Explicit Memory: An Investigation into the Benefits of within-Language Subtitling.” Applied Psycholinguistics 23 (4): 509–33.
Bisson, Marie-Josée, Walter J. B. Van Heuven, Kathy Conklin, and Richard J. Tunney. 2014. “Processing of Native and Foreign Language Subtitles in Films: An Eye Tracking Study.” Applied Psycholinguistics 35 (2): 399–418.
Borrás, Isabel, and Robert C. Lafayette. 1994. “Effects of Multimedia Courseware Subtitling on the Speaking Performance of College Students of French.” The Modern Language Journal 78 (1): 61–75. .
Bravo, Conceiçao. 2008. “Putting the Reader in the Picture. Screen Translation and Foreign-Language Learning.” PhD diss. Rovira i Virgili University. Accessed October 29, 2017. [URL].
Bravo, Conceiçao. 2010. “Text on Screen and Text on Air: A Useful Tool for Foreign Language Teachers and Learners.” In New Insights into Audiovisual Translation and Media, ed. by Jorge Díaz Cintas, Anna Matamala, and Josélia Neves, 269–83. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Caimi, Annamaria. 2006. “Audiovisual Translation and Language Learning: The Promotion of Intralingual Subtitles.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 61: 85–98.
Chai, Judy, and Rosemary Erlam. 2008. “The Effect and the Influence of the Use of Video and Captions on Second Language Learning.” New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics 14 (2): 25–44.
Chandler, Paul, and John Sweller. 1991. “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction.” Cognition and Instruction 8 (4): 293–332.
Chong, Toh Seong. 2005. “Recent Advances in Cognitive Load Theory Research: Implications for Instructional Designers.” Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT) 2 (3): 106–117.
Coe, Robert. 2000. “What Is an ‘Effect Size’?” CEM Centre, University of Durham. Accessed October 29, 2017. [URL].
Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
D’Ydewalle, Géry, and Marijke Van de Poel. 1999. “Incidental Foreign-Language Acquisition by Children Watching Subtitled Television Programs.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28 (3): 227–244.
Danan, Martine. 1992. “Reversed Subtitling and Dual Coding Theory: New Directions for Foreign Language Instruction.” Language Learning 42 (4): 497–527. .
Danan, Martine. 2004. “Captioning and Subtitling: Undervalued Language Learning Strategies.” Meta 49 (1): 67–77.
Danan, Martine. 2015. “Subtitling as a Language Learning Tool: Past Findings, Current Applications, and Future Paths.” In Subtitles and Language Learning. Principles, Strategies and Practical Experiences, ed. by Yves Gambier, Annamaria Caimi, and Cristina Mariotti, 41–61. Bern, New York: Peter Lang.
Field, Andy P., Jeremy Miles, and Zoe Field. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage.
Frumuselu, Anca Daniela. 2015. “Subtitled Television Series inside the EFL Classroom: Long-Term Effects upon Colloquial Language Learning and Oral Production.” PhD diss. Universitat Rovira i Virgili.
Frumuselu, Anca Daniela, Sven De Maeyer, Vincent Donche, and María del Mar Gutiérrez Colon Plana. 2015. “Television Series inside the EFL Classroom: Bridging the Gap between Teaching and Learning Informal Language through Subtitles.” Linguistics and Education 321: 107–117.
Garza, Thomas J. 1991. “Evaluating the Use of Captioned Video Materials in Advanced Foreign Language Learning.” Foreign Language Annals 24 (3): 239–58.
Homer, Bruce D., Jan L. Plass, and Linda Blake. 2008. “The Effects of Video on Cognitive Load and Social Presence in Multimedia-Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 24 (3): 786–797.
Howarth, Jeff. 2015. “Learning by Solving Problems: Cognitive Load Theory and the Re-Design of an Introductory GIS Course.” Cartographic Perspectives 801: 18–34.
Koolstra, Cees M., and Johannes W. J. Beentjes. 1999. “Children’s Vocabulary Acquisition in a Foreign Language through Watching Subtitled Television Programs at Home.” Etr&D-Educational Technology Research and Development 47 (1): 51–60.
Krashen, Stephen D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
Mayer, Richard E. 2003. “Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.” Learning and Instruction 131: 125–39.
Mayer, Richard E. 2009. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, Richard E. 2011. Applying the Science of Learning. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn&Bacon.
Mayer, Richard E. 2014. “Incorporating Motivation into Multimedia Learning.” Learning and Instruction 291: 171–73.
Mayer, Richard E., Hyunjeong Lee, and Alanna Peebles. 2014. “Multimedia Learning in a Second Language: A Cognitive Load Perspective.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 28 (5): 653–660.
Merriënboer, Jeroen J. G. Van, and Paul Ayres. 2005. “Research on Cognitive Load Theory and its Design Implications for E-Learning.” Etr&D 53 (3): 5–13.
Moreno, Roxana. 2005. “Instructional Technology: Promise and Pitfalls.” In Technology-Based Education: Bringing Researchers and Practitioners Together, ed. by Lisa M. Pytlik Zillig, Mary Bodvarsson, and Roger Bruning, 1–19. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Moreno, Roxana, and Richard Mayer. 2007. “Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments.” Educational Psychology Review 19 (3): 309–326.
Nguyen, Frank, and Ruth Colvin Clark. 2005. “Efficiency in E-Learning: Proven Instructional Methods for Faster, Better, Online Learning.” Learning Solutions Magazine, November. Accessed October 29, 2017. [URL].
Sorden, Stephen D. 2012. “The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.” In Handbook of Educational Theories, 1–31. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Sweller, John. 1994. “Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Difficulty, and Instructional Design.” Learning and Instruction 41: 295–312.
Sweller, John. 2005. “Implications of Cognitive Load Theory for Multimedia Learning.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, ed. by Richard E. Mayer, 19–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, John, Jeroen J. G. Van Merriënboer, and Fred G. W. C. Paas. 1998. “Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design.” Educational Psychology Review 10 (3): 251–296.
Talaván, Noa. 2011. “A Quasi-Experimental Research Project on Subtitling and Foreign Language Acquisition.” In Audiovisual Translation Subtitles and Subtitling. Theory and Practice, ed. by Laura Incalcaterra, Marie Biscio, and Máire Àine Ní Mhainnín, 197–218. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Talaván, Noa. 2012. “Justificación teórico-práctica del uso de los subtítulos en la enseñanza-aprendizaje de idiomas.” Trans. Revista de Traductología 161: 23–37.
Talaván, Noa. 2013. La subtitulación en el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Vanderplank, Robert. 1988. “The Value of Teletext Sub-Titles in Language Learning.” ELT Journal 42 (2): 272–81. .
Vanderplank, Robert. 2015. “Thirty Years of Research into Captions/Same Language Subtitles and Second/Foreign Language Learning: Distinguishing between ‘Effects Of’ Subtitles and ‘Effects With’ Subtitles for Future Research.” In Subtiles and Language Learning. Principles, Strategies and Practical Experiences, ed. by Yves Gambier, Annamaria Caimi, and Cristina Mariotti, 19–40. Bern, New York: Peter Lang.
Wuang, Yan-dong, and Cai-fen Shen. 2007. “Tentative Model of Integrating Authentic Captioned Video to Facilitate ESL Learning.” Sino-Us English Teaching 4 (9): 1–13.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Montero Perez, Maribel
2022.
Second or foreign language learning through watching audio-visual input and the role of on-screen text.
Language Teaching 55:2
► pp. 163 ff.
Vanderplank, Robert
2019.
‘Gist watching can only take you so far’: attitudes, strategies and changes in behaviour in watching films with captions.
The Language Learning Journal 47:4
► pp. 407 ff.
Vanderplank, Robert
2019.
Video and Informal Language Learning. In
The Handbook of Informal Language Learning,
► pp. 181 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.