Cover not available
Article published In:
Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts
Vol. 7:2 (2021) ► pp.200–223

An exploration of poetological manipulation on Howard Goldblatt’s translation of Mo Yan’s Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out

 | University of Sydney | West Anhui University
Drawing on André Lefevere’s rewriting theory, this paper explores how Howard Goldblatt translates Mo Yan’s novel Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out (hereafter referred to as L&D) with regard to poetological manipulation. The paper analyses in detail how the translator rewrites the novel’s poetological features, including its unique linguistic, stylistic and narrative features, to produce a translation which is accessible to the intended audience. On the basis of this analysis, the paper identifies three characteristics of Goldblatt’s poetological rewriting: (1) macro-stylistic consistency with the source text, i.e. overall stylistic conformity to the original work; (2) simplification principle; (3) typical features of authentic English writing. The analysis reveals poetological manipulation in the translation process, from which we infer that rewriting in favour of the target poetological currents is the best way to achieve reader acceptance.
Keywords: rewriting, manipulation, poetological currents, Howard Goldblatt’s translation, macro-stylistic consistency, simplification principle, authentic English writing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical lens
  • 3.Method
  • 4.Goldblatt’s rewriting under the manipulation of poetics
    • 4.1The linguistic features
      • 4.1.1Deviated lexical collocation
      • 4.1.2Deviated metaphorical use
      • 4.1.3Deviated simile
    • 4.2Stylistic features
      • 4.2.1Four-character idioms
      • 4.2.2Colloquial and dialect
      • 4.2.3Appellations
      • 4.2.4Folk adages
    • 4.3The narrative features
  • 5.Discussion of Goldblatt’s poetological rewriting
    • 5.1The macro-stylistic consistency with the source text
    • 5.2Simplification principle
    • 5.3Typical features of authentic English writing
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 19 July 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00071.liu
References (29)
References
Bai, Ye. 2012. “Moyan huojiang yinfa de sikao.” [Reflections on Mo Yan’s prize: how to globalise Chinese literature]. People’s Daily (overseas edition). Accessed July 19, 2019. [URL]
Chapman, Raymond. 1973. Linguistics and Literature: An Introduction to Literary Stylistics. Rowman & Littlefield Pub Incorporated.Google Scholar
Chen, Qian. 2010. “Cultural differences in Chinese and English address terms.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 1 (6): 898. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitriu, Rodica. 2004. “Omission in Translation.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 12 (3): 163–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du, Ping, and Lili Zhang. 2015. “Rewriting, Ideology, and Poetics in Goldblatt’s Translation of Mo Yan’s Garlic Ballads .” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 17 (1): 8.Google Scholar
Gentzler, Edwin. 2015. “Translations and Rewritings of Hamlet in China.” Asia Pacific Translation and Intercultural Studies 2 (2): 79–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldblatt, Howard. 2002. “The Writing Life.” The Washington Post, April 28, 2002.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Goldblatt’s talk on Chinese literature.” Accessed July 20, 2018. [URL]
. 2012. Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out. New York: Arcade Publishing.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Zhongguo wenxue ruhe caineng zouchuqu.” [How does Chinese literature go global]. Accessed June 10, 2019. [URL]
Hou, Yu, and Hong Zhu. 2013. “Gehaowen wei duzhe fuze de sixiang yanjiu.” [An Exploration of Goldblatt’s reader-oriented translation view: Illustrated with the translation of Rickshaw Boy ]. Journal of Yanshan University, (Social Science Edition) 14 (2): 93–96.Google Scholar
Huo, Lirong. 2017. “Zhongying siwei fangshi chayi dui fanyi de yingxiang.” [Differences in the way of thinking between China and the west and its influence over translation]. Overseas English (24): 123–124.Google Scholar
Jiang, Nan. 2015. “Moyan xiaoshuo biyu de moshenghua.” [De-familiarised similes in Mo Yan’s novels]. Journal of Pingdingshan College 30 (6): 107–109.Google Scholar
Jiang, Xiaoling, and Chenlu Shi. 2012. “Moyan huojiang fanyi yougong.” [Mo Yan deserves credit for award-winning translation]. Accessed July 23, 2019. [URL]
Lefevere, André. 1992. Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lian, Yajian. 2013. “Gehaowen fanyi sixiang tanjiu.” [Research on Goldblatt’s translation thoughts]. Journal of Weifang College 13 (1): 38–40.Google Scholar
Luo, Guohua. 2017. “Shengsi pilao yiben gaixie xianxiang yanjiu.” [A Study on Howard Goldblatt’s Rewriting of Mo Yan’s Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out]. (MPhil. thesis). Shen Zhen University.Google Scholar
Lupke, Christopher. 2011. Hankering after sovereign images: Modern Chinese fiction and the voices of Howard Goldblatt. Chinese Literature Today, 2(1): 86-93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mi, Yaning. 2012. “Qianlun fanyi yu shixue.” [On translation and poetics]. Journal of Gansu Union University 28 (2): 56–60.Google Scholar
Mo, Yan. 2012. Sheng Si Pi Lao [Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out]. Beijing: The Writer’s Publishing.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2001. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sparks, Stephen. 2013. “Translating Mo Yan: An interview with Howard Goldblatt.” Accessed September 19, 2018. [URL]
Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet. 2000. Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Liming. 2015. “Xushi quantao xiade huangdan: lun moyan shengsi pilao de xushi yishu.” [The absurdity with “narrative trap” – the narrative art of Mo Yan’s Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out ]. Journal of Min Nan Teacher’s University 99 (4): 103–108.Google Scholar
Wang, Liping. 2009. “Yinghan qinshu chengwei de chayi tanyin jiqi fanyi.” [Differences between Chinese and English Kinship relations and Their Translation]. Culture and Education 12 (6): 32.Google Scholar
Zeng, Xiaofeng. 2017. “Caokonglun shijiaoxia gehaowen fanyi xuancai yanjiu.” [Research on Goldblatt’s choice of translation materials: A manipulative perspective]. Journal of Changchun Teacher’s University 36 (9): 78–80.Google Scholar
Zhao, Mingjuan. 2014. “Gaixie lilun shijiaoxia shengsi pilao yingyiben yanjiu.” [The study of the English version of Life and Death Are Wearing Me Out from the perspective of rewriting theory]. (MPhil. thesis), Shandong University.Google Scholar
Zhou, Lei. 2018. “1987: Xianfeng wenxuechang zhongde moyan.” [1987: Mo Yan in avantgarde literary field]. Novel Review (5): 84–92.Google Scholar
Zhu, Lin. 2017. “Rewritings in Translation as Clues of Cultural Mediation and Ideological Manipulation: A Case Study of Lin Shu’s Translation of David Copperfield .” Neohelicon 45(1): 351–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Liu, Bilin
2023. Rewriting as Reception: Gary Snyder’s Representation of Chuang Tzu in His Eco-Poetic Literature. Translation Studies: Theory and Practice 3:1 (5) ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.