Spontane Taaldata en het Meten van Lexicale RIJKDOM I Tweede-taalverwerving
Increasing use of spontaneous speech data in second language re-search made it necessary to use other measures than tests for getting insight into the lexical richness of (spoken) text corpora of second language learners. In this article several lexical measures (types, TTR(c), Guiraud, logTTR, Uber, theoretical vocabulary) are examined and discussed. On the basis of several studies that the TTR is the worst measure possible, but the better measures (types, Guiraud, theoretical vocabulary) are problematic too. Next, the characteristics of the lexical measures are examined by means of a few simple computer simulations with hypothetical lexica. The outcome is mat neither the reliability, nor the validity of the different measures are satisfactory, especially with respect to the TTR.
Article language: Dutch
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Aarts, Rian, Serpil Demir‐Vegter, Jeanne Kurvers & Lotte Henrichs
2016.
Academic Language in Shared Book Reading: Parent and Teacher Input to Mono‐ and Bilingual Preschoolers.
Language Learning 66:2
► pp. 263 ff.
Demir-Vegter, Serpil, Rian Aarts & Jeanne Kurvers
2014.
Lexical Richness in Maternal Input and Vocabulary Development of Turkish Preschoolers in the Netherlands.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43:2
► pp. 149 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.