A Two-Edged Sword
Comparative Assessment Frameworks And Language Education
Tim McNamara | School of Languages and Linguistics, The University of Melbourne
The last two decades have seen the growing use of assessment in the shaping of educational policy in relation to languages. The clearest examples of this in Europe and beyond are the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR: Council of Europe, 2001) and the OECD PISA program for testing reading skills of 15 year olds in OECD member countries. What are the positive and negative impacts of such developments? What social, political and cultural values do such assessments embody? The paper examines these issues by considering the impact of PISA testing in Austria, and demonstrates how its results are interpreted within prevailing discourses on immigration and education within Austrian society. It further compares the values implicit in the PISA assessments with those implicit in the CEFR, and argues that both assessment schemes are directed at the furthering of the process of globalization.
Article language: Dutch
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Flubacher, Mi-Cha & Brigitta Busch
2022.
Language advocacy in times of securitization and neoliberalization: The Network LanguageRights.
Language Policy 21:4
► pp. 545 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.