Lees Niet Verder! Ga Iets Nuttigs Doen
De verwerking van Meerdere Ironische Uitingen in Dezelfde Tekst
In this research, we investigated the influence of co-text (the text of which an utterance is part of) on the processing of ironic evaluations. In an experiment, we adapted and manipulated fragments from film, book and music reviews. Participants randomly read versions with either two ironie evaluations, two literal evaluations, or an ironie evaluation preceded by a literal evaluation. Findings show that literal evaluations (such as "we don't want to hear the local brass band play at a rock festival") were read faster than ironie evaluations (such as "we all love to hear the local brass band play at a rock festival"). However, ironie evaluations were read faster if they were marked by a preceding ironie evaluation. Fragments of negative reviews were interpreted as less negative if they contained irony. Irony thus muted criticism. In addition, appreciation of the reviews was higher if fragments contained two ironie evaluations.
Article language: Dutch
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Burgers, Christian, Margot van Mulken & Peter Jan Schellens
2012.
Type of evaluation and marking of irony: The role of perceived complexity and comprehension.
Journal of Pragmatics 44:3
► pp. 231 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.