Literary History, Modernism, and Postmodernism
(The Harvard University Erasmus Lectures, Spring 1983)
In these lectures, delivered at Harvard University in March 1983, the differences between Modernism and Postmodernism are discussed in semiotic terms, based on a contrastive analysis of semantic and syntactical (compositional) features. They present the major results of research into the literary conventions of Modernism (Gide, Larbaud, V. Woolf, du Perron, Th. Mann) and the innovations of Postmodernism (Borges, Fuentes, Barthelme, Calvino, Hermans). The investigation of innovation in literary history is based on a concept of literary evolution, launched by the Russian Formalists and elaborated by reception theory and semioticians such as Lotman and Eco. The author argues for further corroboration by means of empirical – textual as well as psychological – research.
[Utrecht Publications in General and Comparative Literature, 19] 1984. vi, 63 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Preface
|
vii
|
|
Chapter 1. Literary history from an international point of view
|
1
|
|
Chapter 2. Modernist hypotheses: Literary conventions in Gide, Larbaud, Thomas Mann, Ter Braak, and Du
Perron
|
19
|
|
Chapter 3. Postmodernist impossibilities: Literary conventions in Borges, Barthelme, Robbe-Grillet, Hermans,
and others
|
37
|
|
Notes
|
57
|
Cited by
Cited by 34 other publications
No author info given
1993.
In Modernism and the Nativist Resistance,
► pp. 209 ff. 
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 1 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 23 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 50 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 76 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 100 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 121 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 149 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 161 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 173 ff.
No author info given
1994.
In Postmodernity in Latin America,
► pp. 201 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Geschlecht und Postmoderne,
► pp. 311 ff.
No author info given
2016.
In A Comparative History of Literatures in the Iberian Peninsula [Comparative History of Literatures in European Languages, XXIX],
Borisova, Anastasiya Sergeevna
2018. THE PROBLEM OF CENTRATION AND NON-SELECTION WHEN TRANSLATING THE BOOK OF PSALMS INTO JAPANESE.
Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :6-1 ► pp. 60 ff.
Brink, André P.
1988. Die postmodernistiese roman: ‘n skakel met die 18de eeu?.
Journal of Literary Studies 4:4 ► pp. 378 ff.
Burgos, Fernando
2010.
In Postmodernism’s Role in Latin American Literature,
► pp. 51 ff.
Chen, Jue
2014. Earl Miner: New Sinology through comparative literature.
Neohelicon 41:2 ► pp. 427 ff.
Czarniawska, Barbara
1999. Management she wrote: organization studies and detective stories.
Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 5:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Fokkema, Douwe
2000. Rewriting: Forms of Rewriting in the Chinese and European Traditions.
Comparative Literature: East & West 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Gabriele, John P.
2006. Plotting Postmodern Being in Itziar Pascual'sPère Lachaise.
Studia Neophilologica 78:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Kozlov, Alexey, Anastasia Vasilenko, M.B. Voroshilova & A.I. Suetina
2021. Parody and Caricature in the Satirical Weeklies: Conventions of Perception and Conflict of Interpretations.
SHS Web of Conferences 94 ► pp. 02001 ff.
Liebenberg, Wilhelm
1988. Postmodernism: Progressive or conservative?.
Journal of Literary Studies 4:3 ► pp. 271 ff.
Lombard, Jean
1988. Die komplisering van die verhaaleinde as postmodernistiese verskynsel.
Journal of Literary Studies 4:4 ► pp. 459 ff.
Lützeler, Paul Michael
1990.
In Geschichte als Literatur,
► pp. 67 ff.
Marais, M.J.
1988. The political potential of postmodernist narrative strategies ‐ the case of D.M. Thomas'sArarat.
Journal of Literary Studies 4:4 ► pp. 472 ff.
Polkinchorne, Donald E.
1995. Piacet's and derrida's contributions to a constructivist psychotherapy.
Journal of Constructivist Psychology 8:4 ► pp. 269 ff.
Reuck, Jenny de
1990. Etching “inconscience”: Unreliability as a function in narrative situations.
Journal of Literary Studies 6:4 ► pp. 289 ff.
Roos, Henriette
1994. Literêre geskiedskrywing en/as persoonlike perspektief.
Journal of Literary Studies 10:3-4 ► pp. 331 ff.
Steenmeijer, Maarten
1995. Rayuela de Julio Cortazar: Novela (post)modernista.
Neophilologus 79:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Stephan, Matthias
2019.
In Defining Literary Postmodernism for the Twenty-First Century,
► pp. 33 ff.
van den Berg, Hubert & Walter Fähnders
2009.
In Metzler Lexikon Avantgarde,
► pp. 201 ff.
van Stralen, Hans
1995. Slaughterhouse-Five, existentialist themes elaborated in a postmodernist way.
Neophilologus 79:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Viljoen, Hein
1988. Spieël, kamer van spieëls: Oor Postmodernisme en representasie.
Journal of Literary Studies 4:4 ► pp. 417 ff.
Zima, Peter V.
2013. Historical Periods as Problematics: Socio-linguistic Situations, Sociolects and Discourses.
European Review 21:2 ► pp. 292 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.