The aim of the paper is to account for the pattern of grammatical relations with the debitive, an inflectional form of the Latvian verb expressing necessity. The authors argue that the debitive construction displays what they call diffuse grammatical relations. They show that neither of the arguments in the debitive construction shows clear subject or object properties, and introduce the notion of a demoted intransitive subject occurring alongside a less-oblique datival argument, in a configuration reminiscent of ditransitive structures with demoted direct objects. Such patterns with diffuse grammatical relations are also assigned lexically, not only in Latvian but also in Lithuanian, many Slavonic languages and some Germanic languages such as Icelandic; in the case of the debitive, the diffusemess of grammatical relations is associated with the modal character of the construction, a factor known to induce non-canonical argument marking. The authors also dwell on the diachronic implications of the issues raised in the article, introducing the notion of obliqueness adjustments, i.e., changes in the case-marking of arguments bringing it in line with syntactic obliqueness.
2001Non-canonical A/S marking in Icelandic. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon and Masayuki Onishi (eds), 85–111. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Barðdal, Jóhanna.
2001The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.
1999A syntactic change in progress: The decline in the use of the non-prepositional genitive in Latvian, with a comparative view on Lithuanian. MA thesis, Oslo University.
Bergmane, Anna
1959 1962 Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas gramatika. I. Fonētika un morfoloģija. II.
Sintakse
. Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.
Bielenstein, August
1863/64Die lettische Sprache nach ihren Lauten und Formen erklärend und vergleichend dargestellt. I–II. Berlin: Ferdinand Dümmler.
Blake, Barry J.
2001Case. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blansitt, Edward L.
1984Dechticaetiative and dative. In Objects:Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages 2001.] Frans Plank (ed), 127–150. London & New York: Academic Press.
Boeder, Winfried
1979Ergative Syntax and Morphology in Language Change: The South Caucasian Languages. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Planck (ed), 435–480. London: Academic Press.
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William.
1994The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, Bernard
1975The antiergative: Finland’s answer to Basque. Papers from the eleventh regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society 11, 112–121.
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray.
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: University Press.
De Haan, Ferdinand
2006Typological approaches to modality. In The Expression of Modality, William Frawley (ed), 27–69. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eide, Kristin Melum.
2005Norwegian Modals [Studies in Generative Grammar 74]. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Endzelīns, Jānis.
1901/1975Ursprung und Gebrauch des lettischen Debitivs. Bezzenbergers Beiträge 26: 66–74 = id., Darbu izlase I, Rīga: Zinātne, 143–150.
Endzelīns, Jānis
[J. Endzelin] 1923Lettische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Endzelīns, Jānis.
1932/1980 Dažādas valodas kļūdas [
Various language mistakes
]. 3rd edn. Rīga: A. Gulbis. Reprinted Darbu izlase 3.2, Rīga: Zinātne, 9–45.
Endzelīns, Jānis & Mǖlenbachs, Kārlis.
1907Latviešu gramatika. Rīga: K. J. Zichmanis.
Ernout, Alfred & Thomas, François.
1959Syntaxe latine. 2e éd. Paris: Klincksieck.
Fennell, Trevor G.
1973The subject of Latvian verbs in the debitive mood. In Baltic Literature and Linguistics, Arvids Ziedonis, Jaan Puhvel, Rimvydas Šilbajoris & Mardi Valgemäe (eds), 213–221. Columbus, Ohio: Association for the Advancement of Baltic Studies.
Hansen, Björn.
2000The German modal verb müssen and the Slavonic languages–the reconstruction of a success story. Scando-Slavica 46: 78–92.
Hansen, Björn.
2001Das slavische Modalauxiliar. Semantik und Grammatikalisierung im Russischen, Polnischen, Serbischen, Kroatischen und Altkirchenslavischen. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.
Harris, Alice C.
1981Georgian Syntax. A Study in Relational Grammar [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 33]. Cambridge: University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon and Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Haspelmath, Martin
2010The Behaviour-before-Coding Principle in syntactic change. In Essais de Typologie et de Linguistique Générale: Mélanges Offerts à Denis Creissels, Franck Floricic (ed), 541–554. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de l’École Normale Supérieure.
Haspelmath, Martin
2011On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology 15: 535–567.
Holvoet, Axel
1998Notes on the rise and grammaticalization of the Latvian debitive. Linguistica Baltica 7: 101–118.
Holvoet, Axel
2005Agreement strategies in infinitival clauses in Baltic. In Prace Bałtystyczne 2. Język, literatura, kultura [Baltic Studies 2. Language, Literature, Culture], Ona Vaičiulytė-Romančuk & Norbert Ostrowski (eds), 31–41. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski.
Holvoet, Axel
2007Mood and Modality in Baltic. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Forthcoming. Non-canonical subjects in Latvian: An obliqueness-based approach. In Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, Peter M. Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet & Björn Wiemer (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. Approaches to Grammaticalization vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19.1], Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), 17–36. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56: 251–299.
Keenan, Edward L.
1976Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 303–333. New York: Academic Press.
1974The Diachronic Analysis of English Modals. In Historical Linguistics. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Edinburgh, 2nd-7th Sept., 1973. Vol. I:
Syntax, Morphology, Internal and Comparative Reconstruction
, John Anderson and Charles Jones (eds), 219–249. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Malchukov, Andrej, Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard.
2010Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions
. A Comparative Handbook, Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds), 1–65. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Malchukov, Andrej L. & de Hoop, Helen.
2011Tense, aspect, and mood based differential case marking. Lingua 121: 35–47.
Narrog, Heiko
2010Voice and non-canonical case marking in the expression of event-oriented modality. Linguistic Typology 14: 71–126.
Nau, Nicole
1998Latvian [Languages of the World, Materials 217]. München & Lancaster: Lincom Europa.
Noonan, Michael
2007Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. II. Complex Constructions. 2nd edition, Timothy Shopen (ed), 52–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Onishi, Masayuki
2001Introduction. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon and Masayuki Onishi (eds), (eds) 2001, 1–51. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Palmer, Frank R.
2001Mood and Modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: University Press.
Perlmutter, David M. & Postal, Paul P.
1983Some proposed laws of basic clause structure. In Studies in Relational Grammar, David M. Perlmutter (ed), 81–128. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Pollard, Carl J. & Sag, Ivan A.
1994Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Prellwitz, Walther
1904Zur Entstehung des lettischen Debitivs. Bezzenbergers Beiträge 28: 319.
Primus, Beatrice
1999Cases and Thematic Roles. Ergative, Accusative and Active. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Rappaport, Gilbert C.
1986On anaphor binding in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4(1): 97–120.
Rounds, Carol
2001Hungarian. An Essential Grammar. London/New York: Routledge.
Sands, Kristina & Campbell, Lyle.
2001Non-canonical subjects and objects in Finnish. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon and Masayuki Onishi (eds), 251–305. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann.
2003Case: abstract vs. morphological. In New Perspectives on Case Theory [CSLI Lecture Notes 156], Ellen Brandnerand Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 223–267. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann.
2004Icelandic non-nominative subjects. Facts and implications. In Non-Nominative Subjects. Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao& Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 137–159. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Timberlake, Alan
1974The Nominative Object in Slavic, Baltic, and West Finnic. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.
Woolford, Ellen.
2003Burzio’s generalization, markedness and locality constraints on nominative objects. In New Perspectives on Case Theory [CSLI Lecture Notes 156] Ellen Brandner and Heike Zinsmeister (eds), 299–327. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur.
1985Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3(4): 441–483.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.