Article published in:
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 99146
References
LAV = Latviešu–angļu vārdnīca, electronic dictionary based on Andris Veisbergs, ed., Jaunā latviešu–angļu vārdnīca
, Riga 2001 Available at letonika​.lv.Google Scholar
LVK 2013, balanced corpus of modern standard Latvian, containing 4.5 million running words. Available at korpuss​.lv.Google Scholar
ME = K. Mühlenbachs lettisch-deutsches Wörterbuch. Redigiert, ergänzt und fortgesetzt von J. Endzelin. 1923–1932
Riga: Lettisches Bildungsministerium. Digitalized version available at tezaurs​.lv.
Protokols1918 = Izraksts no Tautas padomes svinīgās sēdes protokola par Latvijas valsts pasludināšanu
From the protocol of the proclamation of the Latvian Republic on 18 November 1918] Available at http://​www​.old​.historia​.lv​/alfabets​/T​/ta​/tautas​_padome​/dokumenti​/1918​.18​.11​.htm
Senie = Latviešu valodas seno tekstu corpus / Corpus of early written Latvian texts
Available at senie​.lv.
Tīm = tīmeklis; corpus compiled from Latvian Internet resources, containing about 97 million running words
Available at www​.korpuss​.lv.

References

Aikhenvald, Aleksandra Yu
2011Causatives which do not cause: Non-valency-increasing effects of a valency-increasing derivation. In Language at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics, Alexandra Yu. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon, 86–142. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ceplīte, Brigita & Ceplītis, Laimdots
1991Latviešu valodas praktiskā gramatika [Practical Latvian Grammar]. Rīga: Zvaigzne.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W.
2000A typology of causatives: Form, syntax, and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Aleksandra Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Aleksandra
2000Introduction. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Aleksandra Aikhenvald (eds), 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]
1922Lettische Grammatik. Riga: Kommissionsverlag A. Gulbis.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993More on the typology of inchoative / causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity, Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 87–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Calude, Andreea, Spagnol, Michael, Narrog, Heiko & Bamyacı, Elif
2014Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: a form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50 (3): 587–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56, 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2009Causative morphemes as non-valency increasing devices. Folia Linguistica 43, 67–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Transitivity typology . In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed), 346–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I.
2001Causatives. In Language Typology and Linguistic Universals. An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmath et al. (eds), vol. 1, 886–898. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
MLLVG-I
1959 = Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas grammatika. I Fonētika un morfoloģija. [Grammar of Contemporary Standard Latvian. Phonetics and Morphology]. Anna Bergmane et al. (eds). Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.Google Scholar
Nau, Nicole
2001Inflection vs. derivation: How split is Latvian morphology? Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54 (3): 253–278.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2007Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009How transitive are ‘eat’ and ‘drink’ verbs? In The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking, John Newman (ed), 27–43. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nedyalkov, V.P. & G.G. Silnitsky
1973The typology of morphological and lexical causatives. In Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, Ferenc Kiefer (ed), 1–32. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, David A. & Barnes, Jonathan
2004Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8 (2): 149–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ostrowski, Norbert
2004Latviešu valodas kausatīvi ar priedēkli -(d)ēt [Latvian causatives in -(d)ēt]. Baltu filoloģija 13 (2): 105–111.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
(ed) 2002The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Introduction. Some basic issues in the grammar of causation. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 1–22. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Pardeshi, Prashant
2002The causative continuum. In The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 85–126. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soida, Emilija
2009Vārddarināšana [Word Formation]. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
2001Linguistic Typology. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2006Review of Masayoshi Shibatani, ed. 2002. Functions of Language 13, 130–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stang, Christian S.
1966Vergleichende Grammatik der baltischen Sprachen. Oslo etc.: Universitets- forlaget.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1985Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics 21, 385–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy J.
1997Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In The Middle Voice in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 5], Crossref logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2016. Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis 58:2  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Nau, Nicole & Jurgis Pakerys
2016. Transitivity pairs in Baltic: between Finnic and Slavic. Lingua Posnaniensis 58:2  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Pakerys, Jurgis
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],  pp. 427 ff. Crossref logo
Riaubienė, Benita
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],  pp. 403 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.