This paper investigates Latvian verbs with causative morphology and their relations to non-causative verbs. Causative morphology comprises vowel alternation and suffixation. The different techniques are largely synonymous, but differ in frequency and productivity. A major concern of this paper is to determine which kinds of base verbs have corresponding morphological causatives and how the argument structure of a causative verb can be linked to that of the base verb. The great majority of Latvian morphological causatives represent the causative prototype: they are systematically related to patientive intransitive verbs whose single argument corresponds to the direct object of the causative construction. Variations to this pattern are found with causatives based on intransitive verbs whose primary argument is an Agent, Experiencer, or Theme. Morphological causatives related to transitive base verbs are rare and predominantly used in monotransitive constructions. In general, causatives with all kind of bases tend to be used in the basic transitive construction of Latvian with one direct object in the accusative, and possibly peripheral arguments marked with the locative or a preposition.
2011Causatives which do not cause: Non-valency-increasing effects of a valency-increasing derivation. In Language at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics, Alexandra Yu. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon, 86–142. Leiden: Brill.
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ceplīte, Brigita & Ceplītis, Laimdots
1991Latviešu valodas praktiskā gramatika [Practical Latvian Grammar]. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
1989Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2000A typology of causatives: Form, syntax, and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Aleksandra Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R.M.W. & Aikhenvald, Aleksandra
2000Introduction. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, R.M.W. Dixon & Aleksandra Aikhenvald (eds), 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1922Lettische Grammatik. Riga: Kommissionsverlag A. Gulbis.
2014Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: a form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics 50 (3): 587–625.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56, 251–299.
2009Causative morphemes as non-valency increasing devices. Folia Linguistica 43, 67–94.
2013Transitivity typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed), 346–367. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kulikov, Leonid I
2001Causatives. In Language Typology and Linguistic Universals. An International Handbook, Martin Haspelmathet al. (eds), vol. 1, 886–898. Berlin: De Gruyter.
1959 = Mūsdienu latviešu literārās valodas grammatika. I Fonētika un morfoloģija. [Grammar of Contemporary Standard Latvian. Phonetics and Morphology]. Anna Bergmaneet al. (eds). Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas izdevniecība.
2001Inflection vs. derivation: How split is Latvian morphology?Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54 (3): 253–278.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.