Article published in:
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 289322
References
Ambrazas, Vytautas
2006Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Anderson, Cori
2009Oblique passivization: evidence from Lithuanian and Slavic. Issledovanija po slavjanskim jazykam [Studies in Slavic Languages] 14: 137–154.Google Scholar
2011Case theory and case alternations: evidence from Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 2: 9–35.Google Scholar
2013Case and event structure in Russian and Lithuanian. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter
2011Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. In Langues baltiques, langues slaves, Daniel Petit, Claire Le Feuvre & Henri Menantaud (eds), 61–92. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard
1986The locus of case assignment and the direction of percolation. In Case in Slavic, Richard Brecht & James Levine (eds.), 91–117. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
1994Case theory, in Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments, Carlos Otero (ed), 630–652. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Babko-Malaya, Olga
1999Zero morphology: a study of aspect, argument structure and case. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1996Passive without theta grids. In Morphological interfaces, Patrick Farrell & Steve Lapointe (eds), 60–99. Stanford, CA: CSLI. Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1986Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Step By Step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–153. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, Maria Cristina
2003Datives at large. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Dowty, David
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eyþórsson, Þórhallur, Janne Bondi Johannessen, Signe Laake & Tor A. Åfarli
2012Dative case in Norwegian, Icelandic and Faroese: Preservation and non-preservation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35(3): 219–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana
1999Aspect, Eventuality Types and Nominal Reference. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2004Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English, in Aspectual Inquiries, Roumyana Slabakova & Paula Kempchinsky (eds), 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert
1992Foundations of Generative Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert & Babby, Leonard
1984On the interaction of lexical and syntactic properties: case structure in Russian. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 71–105.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma
1973Passivnye konstrukcii v litovskom jazyke [Passive constructions in the Lithuanian language]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Vilnius University.Google Scholar
2006Passives in Lithuanian (with comparison to Russian). In Passive and Typology: Form and Function, Abraham Werner & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 29–61. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma & Nedjalkov, Vladimir
1988Resultative, passive, and perfect in Lithuanian. In Typology of Resultative Constructions, Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), 369–386. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jablonskis, Jonas
1997 [1922]Lietuvių kalbos gramatika [Grammar of the Lithuanian language]. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla.Google Scholar
Knjazev, Jurij
1989aResultative, passive, and perfect in Russian. In Typology of Resultative Constructions, Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed), 343–368. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989bAkcional’nost’ i statal’nost’: ix sootnošenie v russkix konstrukcijax s pričastijami na -n, -t [Actionality and statality: their relationship in Russian constructions with participles in -n, -t]. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1992Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters, Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds), 29–54. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lavine, James
2000Topics in the syntax of nonagreeing predicates in Slavic. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
2010Case and events in transitive impersonals. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 18(1): 101-130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Passives and near-passives in Balto-Slavic: On the survival of accusative. In Non-canonical Passives, Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 185–211. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenartaitė, Kristina
2009Tiesioginiai objektai ir ditranzityvinių konstrukcijų klausimas lietuvių kalboje [Direct objects and the problem of ditransitive constructions in Lithuanian]. In Gramatinių funkcijų prigimtis ir raiška[The nature and expression of grammatical functions], Axel Holvoet & Rolandas Mikulskas (eds), 69–98. Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas & Asociacija “Academia Salensis”.Google Scholar
2010Argumentų raiškos alternavimas lietuvių kalboje [Expressions of argument alternations in Lithuanian]. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius University.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan
2002Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4.2, Alexis Dimitriadis & Laura Siegel (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2004The position of morphological case in the derivation: a study on the syntax-morphology interface. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2011Case, in Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed), 52–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Kylie
2007Case and Aspect in Slavic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Maaike
1995Participial passive and aspect in Russian. Utrecht: OTS.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
1984The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2006Case alternations and the Icelandic passive and middle. Ms., lingBuzz/000124, downloaded 10/28/08.
Tenny, Carol
1994Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1982The impersonal passive in Lithuanian. Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 508–524.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
2000Event structure in syntax. In Events as Grammatical objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky (eds), 145–185. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957Verbs and Times. Philosophical Review 56: 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Tom
1977Transformations and the Lexicon, in Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Adrian Akmajian and Tom Wasow (eds), 327–360. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2006aGrammatical evidentiality in Lithuanian (a typological assessment). Baltistica 41(1): 33–49.Google Scholar
2006bRelations between actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian. In Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 274–309. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1980The Case for Surface Case. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1981Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
2006Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37 (1): 111–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar