Cover not available
Part of
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 289–322

Passivization and argument structure in Lithuanian

I examine the connection between internal case marking, telicity and the ability of a verb to passivize in Lithuanian. Crucially, oblique passivization – verbs which take a case other than accusative, yet form agreeing passive participles – is observed, and raises questions of case preservation. Because not all oblique-case verbs allow passivization, I examine the standard approach to case theory, and, following Babby (1994) and Woolford (2006), propose that instances non-structural case can be further distinguished as either lexical and inherent case. Additionally, oblique passives are overwhelmingly found to be instances of actional, rather than statal, passives. Statal passives denote an object-oriented result, and thus a connection between telicity and accusative case is found, following similar conclusions for Slavic in Richardson (2007).
Published online: 5 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.2.06and
References (56)
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 2006. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Anderson, Cori. 2009. Oblique passivization: evidence from Lithuanian and Slavic. Issledovanija po slavjanskim jazykam [Studies in Slavic Languages] 14: 137–154.Google Scholar
. 2011. Case theory and case alternations: evidence from Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 2: 9–35.Google Scholar
. 2013. Case and event structure in Russian and Lithuanian. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter. 2011. Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. In Langues baltiques, langues slaves, Daniel Petit, Claire Le Feuvre & Henri Menantaud (eds), 61–92. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Babby, Leonard. 1986. The locus of case assignment and the direction of percolation. In Case in Slavic, Richard Brecht & James Levine (eds.), 91–117. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar
. 1994. Case theory, in Noam Chomsky: Critical Assessments, Carlos Otero (ed), 630–652. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Babko-Malaya, Olga. 1999. Zero morphology: a study of aspect, argument structure and case. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1996. Passive without theta grids. In Morphological interfaces, Patrick Farrell & Steve Lapointe (eds), 60–99. Stanford, CA: CSLI. Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In Step By Step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–153. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, Maria Cristina. 2003. Datives at large. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eyþórsson, Þórhallur, Janne Bondi Johannessen, Signe Laake & Tor A. Åfarli. 2012. Dative case in Norwegian, Icelandic and Faroese: Preservation and non-preservation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35(3): 219–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, Eventuality Types and Nominal Reference. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi. 2004. Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English, in Aspectual Inquiries, Roumyana Slabakova & Paula Kempchinsky (eds), 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert. 1992. Foundations of Generative Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Freidin, Robert & Babby, Leonard. 1984. On the interaction of lexical and syntactic properties: case structure in Russian. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 71–105.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma. 1973. Passivnye konstrukcii v litovskom jazyke [Passive constructions in the Lithuanian language]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Vilnius University.Google Scholar
. 2006. Passives in Lithuanian (with comparison to Russian). In Passive and Typology: Form and Function, Abraham Werner & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 29–61. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma & Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 1988. Resultative, passive, and perfect in Lithuanian. In Typology of Resultative Constructions, Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), 369–386. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jablonskis, Jonas. 1997 [1922]. Lietuvių kalbos gramatika [Grammar of the Lithuanian language]. Vilnius: Mokslo ir enciklopedijų leidykla.Google Scholar
Knjazev, Jurij. 1989a. Resultative, passive, and perfect in Russian. In Typology of Resultative Constructions, Vladimir Nedjalkov (ed), 343–368. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989b. Akcional’nost’ i statal’nost’: ix sootnošenie v russkix konstrukcijax s pričastijami na -n, -t [Actionality and statality: their relationship in Russian constructions with participles in -n, -t]. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters, Ivan Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds), 29–54. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lavine, James. 2000. Topics in the syntax of nonagreeing predicates in Slavic. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
. 2010. Case and events in transitive impersonals. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 18(1): 101-130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Passives and near-passives in Balto-Slavic: On the survival of accusative. In Non-canonical Passives, Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 185–211. Amsterdam–Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenartaitė, Kristina. 2009. Tiesioginiai objektai ir ditranzityvinių konstrukcijų klausimas lietuvių kalboje [Direct objects and the problem of ditransitive constructions in Lithuanian]. In Gramatinių funkcijų prigimtis ir raiška[The nature and expression of grammatical functions], Axel Holvoet & Rolandas Mikulskas (eds), 69–98. Vilnius: Vilniaus universitetas & Asociacija “Academia Salensis”.Google Scholar
. 2010. Argumentų raiškos alternavimas lietuvių kalboje [Expressions of argument alternations in Lithuanian]. Doctoral dissertation. Vilnius University.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maling, Joan. 2002. Verbs with dative objects in Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 24: 31–105.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4.2, Alexis Dimitriadis & Laura Siegel (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas. 2004. The position of morphological case in the derivation: a study on the syntax-morphology interface. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther. 2011. Case, in Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed), 52–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Kylie. 2007. Case and Aspect in Slavic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Maaike. 1995. Participial passive and aspect in Russian. Utrecht: OTS.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2006. Case alternations and the Icelandic passive and middle. Ms., lingBuzz/000124, downloaded 10/28/08.
Tenny, Carol. 1994. Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 1982. The impersonal passive in Lithuanian. Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 508–524.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 2000. Event structure in syntax. In Events as Grammatical objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky (eds), 145–185. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and Times. Philosophical Review 56: 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Tom. 1977. Transformations and the Lexicon, in Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Adrian Akmajian and Tom Wasow (eds), 327–360. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn. 2006a. Grammatical evidentiality in Lithuanian (a typological assessment). Baltistica 41(1): 33–49.Google Scholar
. 2006b. Relations between actor-demoting devices in Lithuanian. In Passivization and Typology. Form and Function, Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 274–309. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. The Case for Surface Case. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37 (1): 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

SIGURÐSSON, EINAR FREYR & MILENA ŠEREIKAITĖ
2024. The dual face of structural object case: on Lithuanian genitive of negation. Journal of Linguistics 60:1 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Šereikaitė, Milena
2022. Impersonals, passives, and impersonal pronouns: Lessons from Lithuanian. Syntax 25:2 ► pp. 188 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.