Article published in:
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 367–394

Latvian passives – personal, impersonal and evidential

The present article discusses the nature of the Latvian passive and, more specifically, the impersonal passive. It is argued that Latvian has indeed an impersonal passive that shows no signs of turning into an active impersonal, a development that has occurred in the history of Polish and could be an ongoing process in contemporary Lithuanian. Several lexical restrictions on the derivation of the Latvian constructions under discussion shows that they are indeed impersonal passives rather than active impersonals. Conspicuously absent, however, is a ban on the passivization of unaccusatives, as we find it in a number of languages that have a typical impersonal passive. It is suggested that the rise of an evidential passive might have played a certain role in the lifting of the restrictions on the passivization of unaccusatives in Baltic.

Published online: 05 August 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.2.08hol
References
Ambrazas, Vytautas
(ed) 1997 Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P
2003 Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics, 39: 473‒520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ceplīte, Brigita
1985 Neaizmirsīsim lietot ciešamo kārtu [Let’s not forget to use the passive]. Latviešu valodas kultūras jautājumi 21: 134-136.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1975 The antiergative: Finland’s answer to Basque. Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 112–121.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
1993 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]
1923 Lettische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1982 Indefinite agent, passive and impersonal passive: a functional study. Lingua 58, 267–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001 Syntax I–II. 2nd edn. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König
1998 Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe, in Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed), 564–640. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001 Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-Canonical marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language, 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
1995 Indefinite zero subjects in Latvian. Linguistica Baltica 4: 153-161.Google Scholar
2001. Impersonals and passives in Baltic and Finnic. In The Circum-Baltic Languages. Vol. 2, Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series, 55], Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 363–389. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 On the marking of predicate nominals in Baltic. In Studies in Baltic and Indo-European Linguistics: In Honor of William R. Schmalstieg [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 254], Philip Baldi and Pietro U. Dini (eds), 75–90. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Mood and Modality in Baltic. Cracow: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi & Vihman, Virve-Anneli
2006 Invisible arguments. Effects of demotion in Estonian and Finnish. In Demoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 96], Benjamin Lyngfelt & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 111–141. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Dryer, Matthew S
2007 Passive in the world’s languages. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol. 1, Clause Structure, 2nd edn., Timothy Shopen (ed), 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavine, James E
2006 Is there a passive evidential strategy in Lithuanian? In Chicago Linguistic Society 42: 41–55.Google Scholar
2010 Mood and a transitivity restriction in Lithuanian: The case of the inferential evidential. Baltic Linguistics 1: 115–142.Google Scholar
Litvinow, W.P
1989 Der Modus relativus baltischer Sprachen aus typologischer Sicht. Baltistica 25(2): 146–155.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M
1978 Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–190.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985 Passives and related constructions: A protytype analysis. Language 61(4) 1985, 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 Introduction. In Passive and Voice, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 1–8. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2005 Passive constructions. In World Atlas of Linguistic Structures, Martin Haspelmath et al. (eds), 434–437. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011 Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals. Man-constructions vs. Third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 124], Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 57–89. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Tim
1983. Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2: 385−315.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1982 The impersonal passive in Lithuanian. Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 508–524.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D
1990 Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66(2): 221–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie
1993 Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In Semantics and the Lexicon, James Pustejovsky (ed), 129-161. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016. Introduction. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 january 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.