Article published in:
Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic
Edited by Axel Holvoet and Nicole Nau
[Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 2] 2015
► pp. 367394
References
Ambrazas, Vytautas
(ed) 1997Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P
2003Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics, 39: 473‒520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ceplīte, Brigita
1985Neaizmirsīsim lietot ciešamo kārtu [Let’s not forget to use the passive]. Latviešu valodas kultūras jautājumi 21: 134-136.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1975The antiergative: Finland’s answer to Basque. Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 112–121.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
1993Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Endzelin, J[an]
1923Lettische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1982Indefinite agent, passive and impersonal passive: a functional study. Lingua 58, 267–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001Syntax I–II. 2nd edn. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König
1998Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe, in Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed), 564–640. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-Canonical marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language, 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
1995Indefinite zero subjects in Latvian. Linguistica Baltica 4: 153-161.Google Scholar
2001. Impersonals and passives in Baltic and Finnic. In The Circum-Baltic Languages. Vol. 2, Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series, 55], Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), 363–389. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004On the marking of predicate nominals in Baltic. In Studies in Baltic and Indo-European Linguistics: In Honor of William R. Schmalstieg [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 254], Philip Baldi and Pietro U. Dini (eds), 75–90. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Mood and Modality in Baltic. Cracow: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Elsi & Vihman, Virve-Anneli
2006Invisible arguments. Effects of demotion in Estonian and Finnish. In Demoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 96], Benjamin Lyngfelt & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 111–141. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Dryer, Matthew S
2007Passive in the world’s languages. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description vol. 1, Clause Structure, 2nd edn., Timothy Shopen (ed), 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavine, James E
2006Is there a passive evidential strategy in Lithuanian? In Chicago Linguistic Society 42: 41–55.Google Scholar
2010Mood and a transitivity restriction in Lithuanian: The case of the inferential evidential. Baltic Linguistics 1: 115–142.Google Scholar
Litvinow, W.P
1989Der Modus relativus baltischer Sprachen aus typologischer Sicht. Baltistica 25(2): 146–155.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M
1978Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–190.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1985Passives and related constructions: A protytype analysis. Language 61(4) 1985, 821–848. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Introduction. In Passive and Voice, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed), 1–8. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2005Passive constructions. In World Atlas of Linguistic Structures, Martin Haspelmath et al. (eds), 434–437. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals. Man-constructions vs. Third person plural-impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Impersonal constructions. A cross-linguistic perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 124], Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 57–89. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Tim
1983. Subjects across categories. The Linguistic Review 2: 385−315.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1982The impersonal passive in Lithuanian. Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 508–524.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D
1990Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language 66(2): 221–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie
1993Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In Semantics and the Lexicon, James Pustejovsky (ed), 129-161. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Holvoet, Axel & Nicole Nau
2016.  In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.