Cover not available
Part of
The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and beyond
Edited by Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber and Alexander Kautzsch
[Varieties of English Around the World G49] 2014
► pp. 21–38

Convergence and endonormativity at Phase Four of the Dynamic Model

At Phase 4 of the Dynamic Model, Schneider (2007) postulates that a stable postcolonial English will gain acceptance in a country, and become endonormative, but it will also be perceived as homogenous. This paper argues that, in a postcolonial language contact situation, multiple contact settings give rise to different postcolonial Englishes, which will not necessarily converge. The number of contact settings should correspond closely to the number of stabilising varieties. Endonormativity will result from identity rewriting, and this should typically happen for an entire country, or at least for the dominant group of English speakers. These refinements on the Dynamic Model are presented with evidence from the United States of America and South Africa, two less typical settings due to the complexity of their population demographics.
Keywords: American English, convergence, Dynamic Model of Postcolonial Englishes, endonormativity, homogeneity, South African English
Published online: 12 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49.02roo
References (50)
Attwell, D. & Attridge, D. (eds). 2012. The Cambridge History of South African Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnett, U.A. 1983. A Vision of Order: A Study of Black South African Literature in English (1914–1980). Cape Town: Maskew Miller LongmanGoogle Scholar
Bekker, I. 2009. The Vowels of South African English. PhD dissertation, North-West University.Google Scholar
. 2012. South African English as a late 19-century extraterritorial variety. English World-Wide 33(2): 127–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botha. P.W. 1985. Address by the State President P.W. Botha at the opening of the National Party Natal Congres Durban, 15 August 1985. (A.k.a. “The Rubicon Speech”) [URL] (06 September 2013).
Branford, W. & Claughton, J.S. 2002. Mutual lexical borrowings among some languages of southern Africa: Xhosa, Afrikaans and English. In Language in South Africa, R. Mesthrie (ed.), 199–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coetzee-Van Rooy, S. & Van Rooy, B. 2005. Labels, comprehensibility and status in South African English. World Englishes 24(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Da Silva, A.B. 2007. South African English: A Sociolinguistic Investigation of an Emerging Variety. PhD dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
De Klerk, V. 1999. Black South African English: Where to from here? World Englishes 18(3):311–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Corpus Linguistics and World Englishes: An Analysis of Xhosa-English. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
De Klerk, V. & Bosch, B. 1995. Linguistic stereotypes: Nice accent, nice person? International Journal of the Sociology of Language 116(1): 17–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Klerk, V. (ed.). 1996. Focus on South Africa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gough, D. 1996. Black English in South Africa. In V. de Klerk (ed.), 53–77.
Hirson, B. 1981. Language in control and resistance in South Africa. African Affairs 80(319): 219–237.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1997. A battle for sacred power: Christian beginnings among the Xhosa. In Christianity in South Africa: A Political, Social and Cultural History, R. Elphick & R. Davenport (eds), 68–88. Cape Town: David Phillip & Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
Horn, P. 2012. Popular forms and the United Democratic Front. In D. Attwell & D. Attridge (eds), 523–544.
Hundt, M. & Schreier, D. 2013. Introduction: Nothing but a contact language … In D. Schreier & M. Hundt (eds), 1–17.
Jeffery, C. & Van Rooy, B. 2004. Emphasiser now in colloquial South African English. World Englishes 23(2): 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanham, L.W. 1996. A history of English in South Africa. In V. de Klerk (ed.), 19–34.
Lanham, L.W. & MacDonald, C.A. 1979. The Standard in South African English and its Social History. Heidelberg: Groos. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mbeki, T. 1998. Statement of Deputy President Thabo Mbeki at the opening of the debate in the National Assembly, on “Reconciliation and Nation Building”, National Assembly Cape Town, 29 May 1998. [URL] (06 September 2013).
McCormick, K. 2002. Language in Cape Town’s District Six. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meierkord, C. 2012. Interactions across Englishes: Linguistic Choices in Local and International Contact Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, R. 1992. English in Language Shift: The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Indian South African English: Phonology. In Varieties of English. Vol. 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia, R. Mesthrie (ed.), 188–199. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010. Socio-phonetics and social change: Deracialisation of the GOOSE vowel in South African English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(1): 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Transfer and contact in migrant and multiethnic communities: The conversational historical be + -ing present in South African Indian English. In D. Schreier & M. Hundt (eds), 242–257.
Mphahlele, E. 1959. Down Second Avenue. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S.S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ngwenya, T.H. 2012. Black consciousness poetry: Writing against Apartheid. In D. Attwell & D. Attridge (eds), 500–522.
Peterson, B. 2012. Black writers and the historical novel: 1907–1948. In D. Attwell & D. Attridge (eds), 291–308.
Schneider, E.W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. English as a contact language: The “New Englishes”. In D. Schreier & M. Hundt (eds), 131–148.
. 2014. New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes. World Englishes 33(1): 9–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schreier, D. & Hundt, M. (eds.). 2013. English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, B. 2011a. Linguistic penetration at Schneider’s phase 4: Acceptability ratings of entrenched features of Black South African English by South Africans outside the originating culture of the variety. Journal for Language Teaching 45(2): 133–149.Google Scholar
. 2011b. International sporting events in South Africa, identity re-alignment, and Schneider’s EVENT X. African Identities 9(3): 267–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steyn, J.C. 1980. Tuiste in eie taal [At home in one’s own language]. Cape Town: Tafelberg.Google Scholar
. 1992. Die behoud van Afrikaans as ampstaal. [The retention of Afrikaans as official language.] In V.N. Webb (ed.), 201–226.
Titlestad, P. 1996. English, the constitution and South Africa’s language future. In V. de Klerk (ed.), 163–173.
Tottie, G. 2009. How different are American and British English grammar? And how are they different? In One Language, two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, G. Rohdenburg & J. Schlüter (eds), 341–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Walt, J.L. & Van Rooy, B. 2002. Towards a standard in South African Englishes. World Englishes 21(1): 113–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, B. & Terblanche, L. 2010. Complexity in word-formation processes in New Varieties of South African English.Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies28(4): 357–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, R. & Van Rooy, B. 2014. The development of modals of obligation and necessity in White South African English through contact with Afrikaans. Journal of English Linguistics 42(1): 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webb, V.N. 1992. Afrikaans as probleem [Afrikaans as problem]. In V.N. Webb (ed.), 3–23.
Webb, V.N. (ed.). 1992. Afrikaans ná Apartheid (Afrikaans after Apartheid). Pretoria: J.L. van Schaik.Google Scholar
Woeber, C. 2012. The mission presses and the rise of black journalism. In D. Attwell & D. Attridge (eds), 204–225.
Wood, T.M. 1987. Perceptions of, and Attitudes towards, Varieties of English in the Cape Peninsula, with Particular Reference to the ‘Coloured Community’. MA thesis, Rhodes University.Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Partridge, Maristi
2024. Chapter 4. Investigating the complementiser that in the verb complementation of Black South African English. In Constraints on Language Variation and Change in Complex Multilingual Contact Settings [Contact Language Library, 60], ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Sharma, Devyani
2024. Testing sociolinguistic theory and methods in world Englishes. World Englishes DOI logo
Stell, Gerald
2023. Afrikaans English as a Southern Hemisphere English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Meer, Philipp & Robert Fuchs
2022. The Trini Sing-Song: Sociophonetic variation in Trinidadian English prosody and differences to other varieties. Language and Speech 65:4 ► pp. 923 ff. DOI logo
Botha, Werner, Bertus van Rooy & Susan Coetzee‐Van Rooy
2021. Researching South African Englishes. World Englishes 40:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Mesthrie, Rajend
2021. Colony, post‐colony and world Englishes in the South African context. World Englishes 40:1 ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
van Rooy, Bertus
2021. Grammatical change in South African Englishes. World Englishes 40:1 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.