Article published in:English in the Indian Diaspora
Edited by Marianne Hundt and Devyani Sharma
[Varieties of English Around the World G50] 2014
► pp. 105–130
Imperfectives in Singapore’s Indian community
This chapter examines the sociolinguistics of the Indian community in Singapore, with a particular emphasis on the use of the -ing marker among Tamils. The Indian diaspora in Singapore is of interest because the community differs from others in many respects: although a minority of less than 10 percent, Indians enjoy constitutional recognition, primarily through the use of Tamil as one of the four official languages. Furthermore, they are a firmly established ethnic group within the country, both socially and economically, having been instrumental in early colonial times and during the foundation phase of present-day Singapore English. Our study, drawing on data collected from 96 informants coming in equal parts from the Tamil, Chinese, and Malay communities, investigates the use of over-extension of -ing as a marker of all imperfectives, including statives and non-delimited habituals. We found the Tamils rating -ing as acceptable significantly more frequently than the other two groups in the case of statives and non-delimited habituals. As this parallels the Tamil aspectual system, our findings strongly support a substratist explanation for the Indian Singapore English aspect system.
Keywords: ethnic variation, Indian diaspora in Singapore, Singapore English, sociolinguistics of Indian Singaporeans, Tamil
Published online: 28 August 2014
Bao, Zhiming & Hui Min, Lye
Deterding, David & Poedjosoedarmo, Gloria R.
Dixon, L. Quentin
Huang, Vivien Shu Jun
Hundt, Marianne & Vogel, Katrin
Kortmann, Bernd & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
Leimgruber, Jakob R.E.
2009 Modelling Variation in Singapore English. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
2013 The management of multilingualism in a city-state: Language policy in Singapore. In Multilingualism and Language Diversity in Urban Areas: Acquisition, identities, space, education [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 1], Peter Siemund, Ingrid Gogolin, Monika Schulz & Julia Davydova (eds), 227–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Leow, Bee Geok
Leimgruber, Jakob R.E. & Sankaran, Lavanya
2011 Imperfectives in Singapore English: New evidence for ethnic varieties? Poster presented at the 2nd triennial conference of the International Society for the Linguistics of English, Boston, MA, USA, 17–21 June 2011.
Li, Ping & Shirai, Yasuhiro
1996 Prosodic Patterns Characterising Chinese, Indian and Malay Singapore English. PhD dissertation, University of Reading.
Pecotich, Anthony & Shultz, Clifford J.
Pfaff, Meike, Bergs, Alexander & Hoffman, Thomas
I was just reading this article – On the expression of recentness and the English past progressive. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds) 217 239 Cambridge CUP
Rappa, Antonio L. & Wee, Lionel
Sandhu, Kernial Singh
Sharma, Devyani & Rickford, John
Soh, Hooi Ling & Nomoto, Hiroki
Suzanna, Bte Hashim & Brown, Adam
Svalberg, Agneta M.-L. & Hjh Fatimah Bte Hj Awg Chuchu
Tan, Ying Ying
1999 Intonation Patterns of the Chinese, Malay and Indian Varieties of Singapore English: A Substratist Approach. Honours thesis, National University of Singapore.
Wong, Wee Kim