Article published in:
World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations
Edited by Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
[Varieties of English Around the World G57] 2016
► pp. 143172
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Brato, Thorsten
2019.  In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88],  pp. 120 ff. Crossref logo
Brato, Thorsten
2020. Noun phrase complexity in Ghanaian English. World Englishes 39:3  pp. 377 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Aarts, Bas
2011Shifts in English modal verb usage in recent times. Plenary lecture presented at the 44 Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea . Logroño, Spain.
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2013Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41: 104–134.Google Scholar
Biewer, Carolin
2009Modals and semi-modals of obligation and necessity in South Pacific Englishes. Anglistik 20(2): 41–55.Google Scholar
2011Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective. In Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44], Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds), 7–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1980 Wanna and the gradience of auxiliaries. In Wege zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburstag von Hansjakob Seiler, Gunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann (eds), 292–299. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
1978Dare and need in Australian English: A study of divided usage. English Studies 59: 434–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009aModals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28: 281–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bModals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aGrammatical variation in English worldwide: the role of colloquialization. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 8(3): 289–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bGrammatical colloquialism and the English quasi-modals: a comparative study. In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 155–169. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Heyvaert, Liesbet
2007On the middle voice: An interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics 45(1): 37–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2007–TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s-2000s. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/time/.Google Scholar
2010The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coha/Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar, Biewer, Carolin, Hackert, Stephanie & Hilbert, Michaela
2012 Will and would in selected New Englishes: General vs. variety-specific tendencies. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 77–102. Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie, Deuber, Dagmar, Biewer, Carolin & Hilbert, Michaela
2013. Modals of possibility, ability and permission in selected New Englishes. eVarieng 13.http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/13​/hackert​_deuber​_biewer​_hilbert/ (29 September 2014).
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1976Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb. Lingua 40: 331–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey, et al.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
1998New Zealand Grammar. Fact or Fiction? A Corpus-Based Study in Morpho­syntactic Variation [Varieties of English around the World G23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1985Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Randolph Quirk & Henry Widdowson (eds), 11–36. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred G.
2000Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2003The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 223–240. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The modals ARE declining. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4): 547–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2012Speech-act participants in modality. Unpublished manuscript. http://​www​.christianlehmann​.eu​/publ​/lehmann​_modality​.pdf (29 September 2014).
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2009The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750–1710). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2012On the relationship between subjectification, grammaticalization and constructions. Evidence from the history of English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2): 232–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2006Twentieth Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. ­Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M.
2008World Englishes. The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Neil
2009Modal verbs in TIME. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 191–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John
1995Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33: 157–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nokkonen, Soili
2006The semantic variation of NEED TO in four recent British English corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(1): 29–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1997Scope and the development of epistemic modality: Evidence from ought to . English Language and Linguistics 1: 295–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas
2003Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 241–266. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & D’Arcy, Alexandra
2007The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective. English World-Wide 28: 47–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1988Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 2: 49–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. ­Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Noël, Dirk & De Wit, Astrid
2012The diverging need (to)’s of Asian Englishes. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 54–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verplaetse, Heidi
1999The expression of volition in political interviews reconsidered. Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 91–117.Google Scholar
2003What you and I want: a functional approach to verb complementation of modal WANT TO. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 151–189. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony R.
1993English Auxiliaries. Structure and History. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westney, Paul
1995Modals and Periphrastics in English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard
2009Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes 28(4): 421–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar