Article published in:
World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations
Edited by Elena Seoane and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
[Varieties of English Around the World G57] 2016
► pp. 143–172

(Semi-)modals of necessity in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes

In Standard Englishes the semi-modals need (to), want to and have to are gaining ground over central modals such as must (Leech 2013, for example). As a means of exploring the status of these verbs in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes, this paper analyses must, need (to), want to and have to from both a syntactic and a semantic point of view based on examples found in the International Corpus of English (ICE-HK and ICE-IND). It also compares these with examples drawn from the British English component of the ICE project (ICE-GB). Findings show that: (a) semantically, the behaviour of these (semi-) modals differs considerably from one variety to another; (b) the degree of grammaticalization of the semi-modals is lower in Indian English than in the other varieties; and (c) colloquialization and grammaticalization operate synergetically in the replacement of modals with semi-modals.
Keywords: Asian Englishes, colloquialization, grammaticalization, necessity, semi-modals
Published online: 25 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g57.07lou
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Brato, Thorsten
2019.  In Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 88], ► pp. 120 ff. Crossref logo
Brato, Thorsten
2020. Noun phrase complexity in Ghanaian English. World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 377 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References
Aarts, Bas
2011 Shifts in English modal verb usage in recent times. Plenary lecture presented at the 44 Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea . Logroño, Spain.
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2013 Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41: 104–134.Google Scholar
Biewer, Carolin
2009 Modals and semi-modals of obligation and necessity in South Pacific Englishes. Anglistik 20(2): 41–55.Google Scholar
2011 Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective. In Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 44], Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds), 7–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1980  Wanna and the gradience of auxiliaries. In Wege zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburstag von Hansjakob Seiler, Gunter Brettschneider & Christian Lehmann (eds), 292–299. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
1978 Dare and need in Australian English: A study of divided usage. English Studies 59: 434–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009a Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes 28: 281–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013a Grammatical variation in English worldwide: the role of colloquialization. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 8(3): 289–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b Grammatical colloquialism and the English quasi-modals: a comparative study. In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 155–169. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Heyvaert, Liesbet
2007 On the middle voice: An interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics 45(1): 37–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2007– TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s-2000s. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/time/.Google Scholar
2010 The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coha/Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar, Biewer, Carolin, Hackert, Stephanie & Hilbert, Michaela
2012  Will and would in selected New Englishes: General vs. variety-specific tendencies. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 77–102. Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie, Deuber, Dagmar, Biewer, Carolin & Hilbert, Michaela
2013. Modals of possibility, ability and permission in selected New Englishes. eVarieng 13.http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/13​/hackert​_deuber​_biewer​_hilbert/ (29 September 2014).
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993 Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1976 Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb. Lingua 40: 331–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984 Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey, et al.
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
1998 New Zealand Grammar. Fact or Fiction? A Corpus-Based Study in Morpho­syntactic Variation [Varieties of English around the World G23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B.
1985 Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures, Randolph Quirk & Henry Widdowson (eds), 11–36. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred G.
2000 Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1999 Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2003 The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 223–240. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The modals ARE declining. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(4): 547–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Where have all the modals gone? An essay on the declining frequency of core modal auxiliaries in recent standard English. In English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 95–115. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2012 Speech-act participants in modality. Unpublished manuscript. http://​www​.christianlehmann​.eu​/publ​/lehmann​_modality​.pdf (29 September 2014).
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2009 The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750–1710). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2012 On the relationship between subjectification, grammaticalization and constructions. Evidence from the history of English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2): 232–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2006 Twentieth Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. ­Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend & Bhatt, Rakesh M.
2008 World Englishes. The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Millar, Neil
2009 Modal verbs in TIME. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2): 191–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, John
1995 Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals. Linguistics 33: 157–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nokkonen, Soili
2006 The semantic variation of NEED TO in four recent British English corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11(1): 29–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1997 Scope and the development of epistemic modality: Evidence from ought to . English Language and Linguistics 1: 295–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2007 Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas
2003 Changes in the modals and semi-modals of strong obligation and epistemic necessity in recent British English. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 241–266. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & D’Arcy, Alexandra
2007 The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective. English World-Wide 28: 47–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1988 Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 2: 49–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. ­Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Noël, Dirk & De Wit, Astrid
2012 The diverging need (to)’s of Asian Englishes. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World G43], Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds), 54–75. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verplaetse, Heidi
1999 The expression of volition in political interviews reconsidered. Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 91–117.Google Scholar
2003 What you and I want: a functional approach to verb complementation of modal WANT TO. In Modality in Contemporary English, Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Robert Palmer (eds), 151–189. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony R.
1993 English Auxiliaries. Structure and History. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westney, Paul
1995 Modals and Periphrastics in English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard
2009 Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes 28(4): 421–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar