Cover not available
Part of
Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the interplay of emancipation and globalization of ESL varieties
Edited by Sandra C. Deshors
[Varieties of English Around the World G61] 2018
► pp. 217–244

It is time that this (should) be studied across a broader range of Englishes

A global trip around mandative subjunctives

| Zurich University
In subordinate clauses after mandatives such as recommend or require, English speakers can choose between a subjunctive or a modal construction. Studies of this alternation in second-language varieties of English (ESL) are scarce. Previous research looked at the distribution of subjunctives across varieties, speech and writing, their co-occurrence with passive voice and individual triggers. However, these factors have not been studied as predictor variables for the subjunctive: modal alternation. This study uses corpus data from the International Corpus of English and the Global Web-based English corpus to model the relative strength of external predictor variables for the mandative alternation across a broad range of Englishes. The findings do not lend themselves to straightforward interpretation within an individual model of World Englishes.
Keywords: mandative sentences, subjunctive: modal alternation, probabilistic grammar approach
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research: Recent and ongoing change in World Englishes
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Corpus data of World Englishes
    • 3.2Definition of the variable context
    • 3.3Predictor variables
    • 3.4Data retrieval
      • 3.4.1Core study
      • 3.4.2Follow-up study
  • 4.Results: Contextual and/or linguistic factors?
    • 4.1Distribution of mandative subjunctives in ICE by predictor variable
    • 4.2Statistical analysis: Variable importance
    • 4.3Gauging the effect of the trigger
  • 5.Discussion: Mandative subjunctives and models of World Englishes
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • Corpus
  • References
Published online: 13 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g61.09hun
References

Corpus

ICE
The International Corpus of English. [URL].
GloWbE
Corpus of Global Web-based English. [URL].
Albakry, M. & Crawford, W.
2004 Subjunctive triggers in American English newspapers. Paper presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics , Portland, OR.
Algeo, J.
1992 British and American mandative constructions. In Language and Civilization: A Concerted Profusion of Essays and Studies in Honour of Otto Hietsch, C. Blank (ed.), 599–617. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Boberg, C.
2004 English in Canada: Phonology. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, B. Kortmann, E. Schneider, K. Burridge, R. Mesthrie & C. Upton (eds), 351–365. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Collins, P.
2009 Modals and quasi-modals. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English Around the World G39], P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith (eds), 73–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Diachronic variation in the grammar of Australian English. Corpus-based explorations. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67], P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith (eds), 15–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, P., Macalinga Borlongan, A., Lim, J. H. & Yao, X.
2014 The subjunctive mood in English. A diachronic analysis. In Contact, Variation and Change in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series 159], S. E. Pfenninger, O. Timofeeva, A. C. Gardner, A. Honkapohja, M. Hundt, & D. Schreier (eds). 259–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cowie, C.
2007 The accents of outsourcing: The meanings of ‘neutral’ in the Indian call centre industry. World Englishes 26(3): 316–330.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, W. J.
2009 The mandative subjunctive. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, G. Rohdenburg & J. Schlüter (eds), 257–276. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, D.
1998 Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV, 1776–1997, S. Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fowler, H.
1926 A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Green, J. A. & Bayard, D.
2000 Zed to zee: Notes from Dunedin on the Americanisation of the NZE lexicon through time. Te Reo: Journal of the Linguistics Society of New Zealand 43: 63–70.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S.
(ed.) 1996 Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Claredon.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. & Mukherjee, J.
2010 Lexical gravity across varieties of English. An ICE-based study of n-grams in Asian Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(4): 520–548.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hänsel, E. C. & Deuber, D.
2013 Globalization, postcolonial Englishes, and the English language press in Kenya, Singapore, and Trinidad and Tobago. World Englishes 32(3): 338–357.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harsh, W.
1968 The Subjunctive in English. Tuscaloosa AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S.
1997 Mandative Sentences. A Study of Variation on the Basis of the British National Corpus. Lizentiats-Thesis, University of Zurich.
Hundt, M.
1998 It is important that this study (should) be based on the analysis of parallel corpora: on the use of the mandative subjunctive in four varieties of English. In The Major Varieties of English, L. Hans, S. Klintborg, M. Levin and M. Estling (eds), 159–175. Växjö: Växjö University.Google Scholar
2013 The diversification of English: Old, new and emerging epicentres. In English as a Contact Language, D. Schreier & M. Hundt (eds), 182–203. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hundt, M. & Gardner, A. C.
2017 Corpus-based approaches: Watching English change. In English Historical Linguistics: Approaches and Perspectives, L. Brinton (ed.), 96–130. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. & Norheim, E. H.
1988 The subjunctive in British and American English. ICAME Journal 12: 27–36.Google Scholar
Kastronic, L. & Poplack, S.
2014 The (north) American English mandative subjunctive in the 21st century: Revival or remnant? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(2): 71–80.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G.
2009 The revived subjunctive. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, G. Rohdenburg & J. Schlüter (eds), 246–256. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C. & Smith, N.
2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, C.
2006 Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 World Englishes and corpora. In The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes, M. Filppula, J. Klemola, & D. Sharma (eds), 103–122. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R.
2006 World Englishes and the multilingual history of English. World Englishes 25: 381–390.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. & Niedzielski, N.
2003 The globalisation of vernacular variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4): 534–555.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S.
2009 The indigenization of English in North America. In Worlf Englishes – Problems, Properties and Prospects, T. Hoffmann & L. Siebers (eds), 353–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Övergaard, G.
1995 The Mandative Subjunctive in American and British English in the 20th Century. Uppsala: Almquist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Peters, P.
1998 The survival of the subjunctive: Evidence of its use in Australia and elsewhere. English World-Wide 19: 87–103.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The mandative subjunctive in spoken English. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English Around the World G39], P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith (eds), 125–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
1972 A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ronan, P.
2016 Language relations in early Ireland. In Sociolinguistics in Ireland, R. Hickey (ed.), 133–153. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sayder, S.
1989 The subjunctive in Indian, British and American English: A corpus-based study. Linguistische Arbeiten 69: 58–66.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. W.
2000 Corpus linguistics in the Asian context: Exemplary analyses of the Kolhapur Corpus of Indian English. In Parangal cang Brother Andrew: Festschrift for Andrew Gonzalez, M. L. Bautista, T. A. Llamzon, & B. P. Sibayan (eds), 115–137. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
2005 The subjunctive in Philippine English. In Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honor for Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista, D. T. Dayag & S. Quackenbush (eds), 27–40. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
2007 Postcolonial English. Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 The subjunctive in Philippine English – An updated assessment. In Studies in Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English, M. L. S. Bautista (ed.), 159–173. Mandaluyong City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar
2017 Models of English in the world. In The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes, M. Filppula, J. Klemola, & D. Sharma (eds), 35–57. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sedlatschek, A.
2009 Contemporary Indian English. Variation and Change [Varieties of English Around the World G38]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strevens, P.
1992 English as an international language: directions in the 1990s. In The Other Tongue. English Across Cultures, B. B. Kachru (ed.), 27–47. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Strobl, C., Hothorn, T. & Zeileis, A.
2009 Party on! A new, conditional variable-important measure for random forests available in the party package. The R Journal 1(2): 14–17.Google Scholar
Strobl, C., Malley, J. & Tutz, G.
2009 Introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging and random forests. Psychological Methods 14(4): 323–348.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B. & Röthlisberger, M.
2016 Around the world in three alternations: Modelling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2): 109–137.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. & Baayen, H.
2012 Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24: 135–178.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. F.
1980 The marked subjunctive in contemporary English. Studia Neophilologica 52: 271–277.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Y-Y.
2015 The Americanization of the phonology of Asian Englishes: Evidence from Singapore. In Communicating with Asia: The Future of English as a Global Language, G. Leitner, A. Hashim, & H-G. Wolf (eds), 120–134. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van Rooy, B.
2010 Societal and linguistic perspectives on variability in World Englishes. World Englishes 29(1): 3–20.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vine, B.
1999 Americanisms in the New Zealand English lexicon. World Englishes 18(1): 13–22.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waller, T.
2017 Studies of the subjunctive in present-day English: A critical analysis of recent research, leading to a new diachronic investigation of the mandative subjunctive. PhD Dissertation, University College London. 
Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Collins, Peter Craig
2022. Comment markers in world Englishes. World Englishes 41:2 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Mandative subjunctive versus should in world Englishes: a new take on an old alternation. Corpora 15:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Gries, Stefan Th.
2021. (Generalized Linear) Mixed‐Effects Modeling: A Learner Corpus Example. Language Learning 71:3 ► pp. 757 ff. DOI logo
Th Gries, Stefan
2020. On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:3 ► pp. 617 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2021. On models and modelling. World Englishes 40:3 ► pp. 298 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2021. “The next Morning I got a Warrant for the Man and his Wife, but he was fled”. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Hundt, Marianne
2022. Constructional variation and change in N-is focaliser constructions. In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221], ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Just, Erika
2023. Chapter 10. Differential indexing and information structure management. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Just, Erika & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
2022. A corpus-based analysis of P indexing in Ruuli (Bantu, JE103). South African Journal of African Languages 42:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Kastronic, Laura & Shana Poplack
2021. Be that as it may: The Unremarkable Trajectory of the English Subjunctive in North American Speech. Language Variation and Change 33:1 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
La Peruta, Roberta
2022. Using VADIS to weigh competing epicentral influence. World Englishes 41:3 ► pp. 400 ff. DOI logo
Laliberté, Catherine
2022. A Diachronic Study of Modals and Semi-modals in Indian English Newspapers. Journal of English Linguistics 50:2 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Moretti, Lorenzo
2023. The Functions of Auxiliary Do in Middle English Poetry: A Quantitative Study. Journal of English Linguistics 51:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Rautionaho, Paula
2022. Revisiting the myth of stative progressives in world Englishes. World Englishes 41:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. “The next Morning I got a Warrant for the Man and his Wife, but he was fled”. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.