Figure 1.Cross-tabulation of global CCR rates according to gender and age
group
141
Figure 2.Global CCR rates according to morphemic status
141
Figure 2a.Percentages of total token numbers per environment according to morphemic
status
142
Figure 3.Global CCR rates according to following environment
142
Figure 3a.Percentages of total token numbers per environment according to following
environment
143
Figure 4.Global CCR rates according to preceding environment
143
Figure 4a.Percentages of total token numbers per environment according to preceding
environment
144
Figure 5.Instances of nonstandard was and standard were across male
speakers
163
Figure 6.Instances of nonstandard was and standard were across female
speakers
164
Figure 7.Cross-tabulation of nonstandard was according to gender and age
group
165
Figure 8.Nonstandard was and standard were rates according to type of
subject
166
Figure 8a.Percentages of total token numbers per environment according to type of
subject
166
Figure 9.Nonstandard was and standard were rates according to intervening
linguistic material
167
Figure 9a.Percentages of total token numbers per environment according to
intervening linguistic material
168
Figure A1.Nonstandard was and standard were rates according to age group in
existential environments only
226
Figure A1a.Percentages of total token numbers according to age group in existential
environments only
227
Figure A2.Nonstandard was and standard were rates according to gender in
existential environments only
227
Figure A2a.Percentages of total token numbers according to gender in existential
environments only
227
Figure A3.Nonstandard was and standard were rates according to intervening material
in existential environments only
228
Figure A3a.Percentages of total token numbers according to intervening material in
existential environments only
228