A computational model of the discovery of writing
This paper reports on a computational simulation of the evolution of early writing systems from pre-linguistic symbol systems, something for which there is poor evidence in the archaeological record. The simulation starts with a completely concept-based set of symbols, and then spreads those symbols and combinations of these to morphemes of artificially generated languages based on semantic and phonetic similarity.
While the simulation is crude, it is able to account for the observation that the development of writing systems ex nihilo seems to be facilitated in languages that have largely monosyllabic morphemes, or that have abundant ablauting processes. We are also able to model what appears to be two possible lines of development in early writing whereby symbols are associated to the sounds of all morphemes linked to a concept (as seems to have been the case in Sumerian), versus just one morpheme linked to a concept (as seems to have been the case in Chinese). Finally, the model is able to offer an account of the apparent rapid development of writing in Mesopotamia that obviates the need to posit a conscious invention of writing, as proposed by Glassner.
The proposed model thus opens a new approach to thinking about the emergence of writing and its properties, something that, as noted above, has scant direct archaeological evidence.
The software is released open-source on GitHub.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Preliminaries
- 2.1What is writing?
- 2.2Why is writing hard to discover?
- 3.The model
- 4.Experiment 1: Simulating different phonological conditions
- 5.Experiment 2: Symbols representing concepts versus morphemes
- 6.Experiment 3: Was writing “invented”?
- 7.Conclusions and future research
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References
Barbeau, Marius
(
1950)
Totem Poles.
Anthropology Series 30, National Museum of Canada Bulletin 119, vol. 1–21. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baxter, William
(
1992)
A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, no. 64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baxter, William, & Sagart, Laurent
(
2014)
Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[URL].
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Bliss, Charles
(
1965)
Semantography. Sydney: Semantography (Blissymbolics) Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boltz, William
(
1994)
The Origin and Early Development of the Chinese Writing System.
American Oriental Series, no. 78. New Haven: American Oriental Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boltz, William
(
2000)
Monosyllabicity and the origin of the Chinese script.
Tech. rept. 143. Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buckley, Eugene
(
2008)
Monosyllabicity and the origins of syllabaries. In: Linguistic Society of America.
[URL].
Dalley, Stephanie
(
2005)
The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer by
Jean-Jacques Glassner; Translated by
Zainab Bahrani and
Marc Van De Mieroop.
Technology and Culture, 46(2), 408–409.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Darwin, Charles
(
1859)
The Origin of Species. New York: Mentor. Mentor edition (1958).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeFrancis, John
(
1984)
The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeFrancis, John
(
1989)
Visible Speech: The Diverse Oneness of Writing Systems. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeHaene, Stanislas
(
2009)
Reading in the Brain: The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention. New York: Viking.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Englund, Robert
(
2005)
The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer by
Jean-Jacques Glassner; Translated by
Zainab Bahrani and
Marc Van De Mieroop.
Journal of the American Oriental Society, 125(1), 113–116.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ETCSL
(
2006)
Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature.
[URL].
Farmer, Steve, Henderson, John and Witzel, Michael
(
2002)
Neurobiology, Layered Texts, and Correlative Cosmologies: A Cross-Cultural Framework for Premodern History.
Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities. 721. 48–90.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farmer, Steve, Sproat, Richard, & Witzel, Michael
(
2004)
The Collapse of the Indus-Script Thesis: The Myth of a Literate Harappan Civilization.
Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies, 11(2), 19–57.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gelb, Ignace
(
1963)
A Study of Writing. Second edition, University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glassner, Jean-Jacques
(
2000)
Écrire à Sumer: L’invention du cunéiforme. Paris: Seuil.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glassner, Jean-Jacques
(
2003)
The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Translated by
Zainab Bahrani and
Marc van de Mieroop.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goody, Jack
(
1977)
The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Themes in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goody, Jack, & Watt, Ian
(
1968)
The consequences of literacy. Pages 27–68 of:
Goody, J. (ed),
Literacy in Traditional Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gorman, Kyle
(
2016)
Pynini: A Python library for weighted finite-state grammar compilation. In:
StatFsm.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gould, Stephen Jay
(
1974)
Ever Since Darwin: Reflections on Natural History. New York: W. W. Norton.
Chapter 12, pages 103–110.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackson, Anthony
(
1990)
The Pictish Trail. Orkney Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keightley, David
(
1978)
Sources of Shang History: The Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of Bronze Age China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirby, Simon
(
1999)
Function, Selection and Innateness: the Emergence of Language Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levenshtein, Vladimir
(
1966)
Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals.
Soviet Physics Doklady, 10(8), 707–710.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Hsiao-Ting
(
1968)
從六書的觀點看甲骨文 (Viewing the Oracle Bone inscriptions from the point of view of the ‘Six Writings’).
南洋大學學報, 21, 84–106.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mallery, Garrick
(
1883)
Pictographs of the North American Indians: A Preliminary Paper.
Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, no. 4. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution. Available from Google Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morris, Henry
(
1974)
Scientific Creationism. San Diego: Institute for Creation Research.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Niyogi, Partha
(
2006)
The Computational Nature of Language Learning and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oppenheim, A. Leo
(
1959)
On an operational device in Mesopotamian bureaucracy.
Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 181(121–128).
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paley, William
(
1826)
Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity. Oxford: J. Vincent.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perfetti, Charles, Nelson, Jessica, Liu, Ying, Fiez, Julie, & Tan, Li-Hai
(
2010)
The neural bases of reading: Universals and writing system variations.
Chapter 6, pages 147–172 of:
Cornelissen, P.,
Kringelback, M., &
Hansen, P. (eds),
The Neural Basis of Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Powell, Barry
(
2009)
Writing: Theory and History of the Technology of Civilization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roark, Brian, Sproat, Richard, Allauzen, Cyril, Riley, Michael, & Jeffrey, Sorensen
(
2012)
The OpenGrm open-source finite-state grammar software libraries. Pages 61–66 of:
Association for Computational Linguistics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robson, Eleanor
(
2005)
The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer by Jean-Jacques Glassner; Translated by Zainab Bahrani and Marc Van De Mieroop.
American Journal of Archaeology, 110(1), 171–172.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sampson, Geoffrey
(
1985)
Writing Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmandt-Besserat, Denise
(
1996)
How Writing Came About. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seidl, Ursula
(
1989)
Die babylonischen Kudurru- Reliefs. Symbole mesopotamischer Gottheiten. Universitätsverlag Freiburg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sproat, Richard
(
2000)
A Computational Theory of Writing Systems. ACL Studies in Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sproat, Richard
(
2010)
Language, Technology, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sproat, Richard
(
2014)
A Statistical Comparison of Written Language and Nonlinguistic Symbol Systems.
Language, 90(2), 457–481.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stauder, Andréas
(
2010)
The earliest Egyptian writing. Pages 137–147 of:
Woods, Christopher,
Teeter, Emily, &
Emberling, Geoff (eds),
Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond.
Oriental Institute Museum Publications, no. 32. Chicago: Oriental Institute.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steinthal, Heyman
(
1852)
Die Entwicklung der Schrift, nebst einem offenen Sendschreiben an Herrn Professor Pott. Berlin: Ferd. Dümmler’s Verlagsbuchhandlung.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Haicheng
(
2014)
Writing and the Ancient State: Early China in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whittaker, Gordon
(
2009)
The Principles of Nahuatl Writing. Göttinger Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 161, 47–81.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wieger, Léon
(
1965)
Chinese Characters: Their Origin, Etymology, History, Classification and Signification. A Thorough Study from Chinese Documents. New York: Dover Publications. Translated by L. Davrout.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woods, Christopher, Teeter, Emily, & Emberling, Geoff
(eds) (
2010)
Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond.
Oriental Institute Museum Publications, no. 32. Chicago: Oriental Institute.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.