Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Writing Systems: Past, present (… and future?)
Edited by Terry Joyce and Robert Crellin
[Written Language & Literacy 22:2] 2019
► pp. 167–178
Introduction

Writing systems

Past, present (… and future?)

| Tama University
| University of Cambridge
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Writing systems along the temporal dimension
  • 3.Universal themes that transcend time
    • The pervasive nature of orthographic variation
    • Enduring issues for writing systems research
  • Acknowledgement
  • Note
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 30 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00024.joy
References (15)
References
Coulmas, Florian. (1996). Typology of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch internationaler Forschung [Writing and its use: An interdisciplinary handbook of international research] Vol. 21, 1380–1387. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 110(4): 727–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Aramaic scripts for Aramaic languages. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 499–504. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frost, Ram, Leonard Katz & Shlomo Bentin. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 131: 104–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J. (1963). A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E. (2017). Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research, 9(1), 14–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry, Bor Hodošček, & Hisashi Masuda. (2012). Orthographic representation and variation within the Japanese writing system: Some corpus-based observations. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 254–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Ross. (1996). Korean writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 218–227. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. (2012). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 11, 708–721.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
Rempel, Robin. (1995). Alphabet development guide. Read, 30 (2), 27–37.Google Scholar
Share, David L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smalley, William A. (1959). How shall I write this language? The Bible Translator, 10(2), 49–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1965). Orthographic studies: Articles on new writing systems. London: United Bible Societies.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard. (2000). A computational theory of writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Chagas de Souza, Paulo
2022. So-called orthographic depth is not always consistent. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.