Article published in:
Writing Systems: Past, present (… and future?)
Edited by Terry Joyce and Robert Crellin
[Written Language & Literacy 22:2] 2019
► pp. 198222
References

[ p. 220 ]References

Amadasi Guzzo
(2014) Punic scripts. In Jo Ann Hackett & Walter E. Aufrecht (eds.), “An eye for form”: Epigraphic essays in honor of Frank Moore Cross, 314–333. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Bauer, Thomas
(1996) Arabic writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 559–568. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
(1996) Typology of writing systems. In Hartmut Günther & Otto Ludwig (eds.), Schrift und Schriftlichkeit [Writing and its use], Vol. 2, 1380–1387. ( Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 10.) Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Crellin, Robert & Tamponi, Lucia
forthc.). Vowel quantity and quality in Neo-Punic and Latin inscriptions from Africa and Sardinia. In Geoffrey Khan and Aaron Hornkohl eds. Studies in Semitic vocalizations and reading traditions Cambridge University of Cambridge & Open Book
Daniels, Peter T.
(1990) Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society 110(4): 727–731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996a) Aramaic scripts for Aramaic languages. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 499–504. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1996b) Mandaic. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 511–514. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Peter T. & William Bright
(eds.) (1996) The world’s writing systems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donner, Herbert & Wolfgang Röllig
(1968) Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften. 2nd edn. vol. 2. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
(2002) Kanaanäische und aramäische Inschriften. 5th edn. vol. 1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Faber, Alice
(1992) Phonemic segmentation as epiphenomenon: Evidence from the history of alphabetic writing. In Pamela Downing, Susan D. Lima, and Michael Noonan (eds.), The linguistics of literacy. ( Typological Studies in Language, 21.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferjaoui, Ahmed
(2007) L’onomastique dans les inscriptions néopuniques de l’Afrique à l’époque romaine. Orientalia 76 (1): 33–46.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Johannes, Wolfgang Röllig & Maria Giulia Amadasi Guzzo
(1999) Phönizisch-Punische Grammatik. ( Analecta Orientalia, 55.) 3rd edn. Rome: Pontificio Instituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace J.
(1963) A study of writing: The foundations of grammatology. 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
(2017) Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research 9 (1): 14–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, Jo Ann
(2004) Phoenician and Punic. In Roger D. Woodard (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the world’s ancient languages, 365–385. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Phoenician and Punic. In Roger D. Woodard (ed.), The ancient languages of Syria-Palestine and Arabia, 82–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 221 ]
Häberl, Charles G.
(2006) Iranian scripts for Aramaic languages: The origin of the Mandaic script. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 341: 53–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoftijzer, Jacob & Karel Jongeling
(eds.) (1995) Dictionary of the North-West Semitic inscriptions. 2 vols. ( Handbuch der Orientalistik, 21.) Leiden & New York: Brill.Google Scholar
Jongeling, Karel
(1984) Names in Neo-Punic Inscriptions. (PhD dissertation). University of Groningen.Google Scholar
(2003) Use of vowel letters in Neo-Punic texts from Guelma. Dutch Studies on Near Eastern Languages and Literatures 5(1–2): 117–136.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2008) Handbook of Neo-Punic inscriptions. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Jongeling, Karel & Robert M. Kerr
(eds.) (2005) Late Punic epigraphy: An introduction to the study of Neo-Punic and Latino-Punic inscriptions. Tübingen: Mohr SiebeckGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Robert M.
(2010) Latino-Punic epigraphy: A descriptive study of the inscriptions. ( Forschungen zum Alten Testament , 42.) Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Phoenician-Punic: The view backward – phonology versus paleography. In Robert D. Holmstedt & Aaron Schade (eds.), Linguistic studies in Phoenician in memory of J. Brian Peckham, 9–29. Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
(2014) Punic erections: A neglected field of study – some grammatical remarks. KUSATU 17: 157–193.Google Scholar
(2018) In search of the historical Moloch. In Robert M. Kerr, Robert Miller II & Philip C. Schmitz (eds.), “His word soars above him”: Biblical and North-West Semitic studies presented to Professor Charles R. Krahmalkov, 59–80. Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Krahmalkov, Charles R.
(2001) A Phoenician-Punic grammar. ( Handbuch der Orientalistik, 54). Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Reinhard G.
(2012) 27-30-22-26 – How many letters needs and alphabet? The case of Semitic. In Alex de Voogt and Joachim Friedrich Quack (eds.), The idea of writing: Writing across borders, 11–52. Leiden & Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macuch, Rudolf
(1965) Handbook of Classical and Modern Mandaic. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Menken, Daniel Lee
(1981) Neopunic orthography. (PhD dissertation). Harvard University.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus
(1968) Local cultures in the Roman Empire: Libyan, Punic and Latin in Roman Africa. The Journal of Roman Studies 58: 126–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muraoka, Takamitsu
(1997) Classical Syriac: A basic grammar with a chrestomathy. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Nöldeke, Theodor
(2003 [1904]) Compendious Syriac grammar, translated from the second German edition by James A. Crichton. Eugene, Ore.: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Michael Patrick
(1996) Epigraphic Semitic scripts. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 88–107. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peckham, J. Brian
(1968) The development of the late Phoenician scripts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
(2015) Writing systems. 2nd rev. edn. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Smelik, Klaas A. D.
(1995) Moloch, Molekh, or molk-sacrifice? A reassessment of the evidence concerning the Hebrew term Molekh. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament 9(1): 133–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 222 ]
Sznycer, Maurice
(1999) Le punique en afrique du nord à l’époque romaine d’après les témoignages épigraphiques. In Serge Lancel (ed.), Numismatique, langues, écritures et arts du livre, spécificité des arts figurés: actes du VIIe colloque international réunis dans le cadre du 121e congrès des Sociétés historiques et scientifiques, Nice, 21 au 31 octobre 1996, 171–181. Paris: Éditions du Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques.Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew
(2012) Neo-Punic and Latin inscriptions in Roman North Africa: Function and display. In Alex Mullen & Patrick James (eds.), Multilingualism in the Graeco-Roman worlds, 265–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zamora López, José Ángel
(2012) La escritura en el period púnico tardío: La epigrafía neopúnica en Hispania como product histórico. In Bartolomé Mora Serrano & Gonzalo Cruz Andreotti (eds.), La etapa neopúnica en Hispania y el Mediterráneo centro occidental: identidades compartidas, 113–140. ( Historia y Geografía, 246.) Seville: Secretariado de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Zevit, Ziony
(1980) Matres lectionis in ancient Hebrew epigraphs. ( American Schools of Oriental Research, 2.) Cambridge, Mass: American Schools of Oriental Research.Google Scholar
Ziadeh, Farhat J. & R. Bayly Winder
(1957) An introduction to modern Arabic. Princeton & London: Princeton University Press & Oxford University Press.Google Scholar