Article published in:
Writing Systems: Past, present (… and future?)
Edited by Terry Joyce and Robert Crellin
[Written Language & Literacy 22:2] 2019
► pp. 223–246

More than an alphabet

Linguistic features of Korean and their influences on Hangul word recognition

| University of Cincinnati
| Yeungnam University
| Yeungnam University
The Korean Hangul writing system conforms to the alphabetic principle to the extent that its graphs (i.e., its minimal orthographic components) represent phonemes, but it differs from the standard convention of alphabetic orthography by configuring its syllables as blocks. This paper describes the orthographic, phonological, and morphological characteristics of the Korean language and Hangul and reviews a selection of psycholinguistic studies that have investigated Hangul word recognition. In contrast to the results of studies employing Roman alphabetic orthographies, the reviewed evidence highlights at sublexical levels both the dominance of syllable-based processing and a propensity to process CVC syllables as body (CV) plus coda (C) units rather than as onset (C) plus rime (VC) units, which together indicate a script-specific decoding of Hangul words. Although the morphological characteristics of Korean have yet to be fully investigated, consistent with the fact that approximately 70 percent of the Korean lexicon consists of Sino-Korean vocabulary, studies have also observed morphological effects on Hangul word recognition. Based on the psycholinguistic evidence reviewed, this paper concludes by proposing to refer to Hangul as a morphosyllabic alphabet writing system, to the extent that the term appears to adequately capture the orthographic, phonological, and morphological characteristics of the script.
Keywords: Korean Hangul, orthography, phonology, morphology, word recognition
Published online: 30 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00027.pae
References

References

Bae, Sungbong & Kwangoh Yi
(2010) Processing of orthography and phonology in Korean word recognition. Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology 22: 369–385. [in Korean] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) The effects of Hanja primes on the recognition of Hanja words printed in Hangul. The Journal of Linguistic Science 79: 139–156. [in Korean] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 243 ]
Baek, Seunghyun
(2014) Sub-syllabic processing in young Korean-English bilinguals: Semivowel placement differences between Korean and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43: 507–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas & Christian Koops
(2010) The interplay of left- and right-branching effects: A phonotactic analysis of Korean syllable structure. Lingua 120: 35–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Phonotactic constraints and sub-syllabic structure: A difficult relationship. Journal of Linguistics 51: 3–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonatti, Luca L., Marcela Peña, Marina Nespor & Jacques Mehler
(2005) Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science 16: 451–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel & Cathy J. Price
(2008) Brain activation for consonants and vowels. Cerebral Cortex 18: 1727–1735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, Manuel, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia & Nicola Molinaro
(2009) Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. Cerebral Cortex 19: 2659–2670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Jeung-Ryeul
(2009) Syllable and letter knowledge in early Korean Hangul reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 101: 938–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, Bruce L., Yeo Bom Yoon & Sook Whan Cho
(1993) The organization of the Korean syllable: Experimental evidence. In Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), Japanese / Korean Linguistics, Vol. 2, 223–238. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni & Manuel Carreiras
(2011) The relative position priming effect depends on whether letters are vowels or consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology 37: 1143–1163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Laurie Beth & Darinka Andjelković
(1992) Morphological analysis in word recognition. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, 343–360. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Ram, Leonard Katz & Shlomo Bentin
(1987) Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13: 104–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Hitoshi
(1992) An investigation of the recognition process for jukugo by use of priming paradigms. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 63: 303–309 [in Japanese]. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Glyn W., Lindsay J. Evett & Philip T. Quinlan
(1990) Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology 22: 517–560. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry
(2002) Constituent-morpheme priming: Implications from the morphology of two-kanji compound words. Japanese Psychological Research 44: 79–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Hyewon & Greg B. Simpson
(1996) Development of semantic and phonological priming in a shallow orthography. Developmental Psychology 32(5): 860–866. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 244 ]
Kim, Zong Su
(1982) Hangului gaebaleul wihan yeongu – Hangeul puleosseugiwa Hangul umseong giho 한글의 개발을 위한 연구 – 한글 풀어쓰기와 한글 음성 기호 [A study of Hangul enhancement – Writing Hangul in linearity and Korean phonetic symbols]. Hangul 177: 133–178. [in Korean]Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Suk
(2008) Cat in a hat or cat in a cap? An investigation of developmental trajectories of phonological awareness for Korean children. Journal of Research in Reading 31: 359–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, Ross
(1996) Korean writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 218–227. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, Youan, Kichun Nam & Yoonhyoung Lee
(2015) The role of orthographic syllable frequency in the syllable frequency effect: Evidence from Korean. Perceptual & Motor Skills 120, 95–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Iksop
(1985) Hangeului moasseugi bangsigui pyouiseonge daehayeo 한글의 모아쓰기 방식의 표의성에 대하여 [The semantic representation of the block format of Hangul]. Kukeosaenghwal 3: 16–31. [in Korean]Google Scholar
Lee, Yongeun & Matthew Goldrick
(2008) The emergence of sub-syllabic representations. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 155–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pae, Hye K.
(2011) Is Korean a syllabic alphabet or an alphabetic syllabary? Writing Systems Research 3(2): 103–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pae, Hye K., Sungbong Bae & Kwangoh Yi
(2019) Is the consonant primacy script-universal or script-specific? Evidence from non-Roman script Korean Hangul. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 31: 1085–1106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Park, Changho
(2009) Visual processing of Hangul, the Korean script. In Chungmin Lee, Greg B. Simpson & Youngjin Kim (eds.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics, 379–389. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, Charles A.
(2003) The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 7(1): 3–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, Charles A. & Ying Liu
(2005) Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems. Reading and Writing 18: 193–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
(2015) Writing systems (2nd ed.). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Schmalz, Xenia, Eva Marinus, Max Coltheart & Anne Castles
(2015) Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22: 1614–1629. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Greg B. & Hyewon Kang
(2004) Syllable processing in alphabetic Korean. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 17: 137–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Share, David L.
(2008) On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin 134: 584–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tae, Jini, Ye-eun Nam, Yoonhyoung Lee & Tae H. Kim
(2015) The effect of the orthographic and phonological priming in Korean visual word recognition. The Journal of Linguistic Science 73: 205–224. [In Korean]Google Scholar
Taylor, Insup & M. Martin Taylor
(2014) Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean, and Japanese (revised ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
[ p. 245 ]
Tse, Chi-Shing, Melvin J. Yap, Yuen-Lai Chan, Wei Ping Sze, Cyrus Shaoul & Dan Lin
(2017) The Chinese lexicon project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research Methods 49: 1503–1519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Assche, Eva & Jonathan Grainger
(2006) A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32: 399–415.Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh
(1995) The internal structure of Kulja and its relation to syllable in Korean. Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7: 57–69. [in Korean]Google Scholar
(1998) The internal structure of Korean syllables: Rhyme or body? Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 10: 67–83. [in Korean]Google Scholar
(2009) Morphological representation and processing of Sino-Korean words. In Chungmin Lee, Greg B. Simpson & Youngjin Kim (eds.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics, 398–408. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh & Sungbong Bae
(2009) Effects of orthographic and morphological frequency of a syllable in Korean word recognition. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science 20: 309–333. [in Korean]Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh, & Hyensou Pak
(1997) The restoration of deep syllables and the role of syllables in Korean speech perception. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 9: 73–94. [in Korean]Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh & Insun Yi
(1999) Morphological processing in Korean word recognition. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 11: 77–91. [in Korean]Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh, Jin-gab Jung, & Sungbong Bae
(2007) Writing system and visual word recognition: Morphological representation and processing in Korean. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology 9: 313–327. [in Korean]Google Scholar
Yi, Kwangoh, Min-Mo Koo, Kichun Nam, Kinam Park, Taejin Park, Sungbong Bae, Chang H. Lee, Hye-Won Lee, & Jeung-Ryeul Cho
(2017) The Korean lexicon project: A lexical decision study on 30,930 Korean words and nonwords. The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology 29(4): 395–410. [in Korean] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Yeo Bom, & Bruce L. Derwing
(2001) A language without a rhyme: Syllable structure experiments in Korean. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 46: 187–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, Hye-Kyung, Donald J. Bolger, Oh-Seek Kwon & Charles A. Perfetti
(2002) Subsyllabic units in reading: A difference between Korean and English. In Ludo Vehoeven, Carsten Elbrow & Pieter Reitsma (eds.), Precursors of functional literacy, 139–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Xiaolin, William Marslen-Wilson, Marcus Taft & Hua Shu
(1999) Morphology, orthography, and phonology reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes 14: 525–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Johannes C. & Usha Goswami
(2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin 131: 3–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 246 ]
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Pae, Hye K.
2020.  In Script Effects as the Hidden Drive of the Mind, Cognition, and Culture [Literacy Studies, 21], ► pp. 71 ff. Crossref logo
Pae, Hye K., Sungbong Bae & Kwangoh Yi
2020. Lexical properties influencing visual word recognition in Hangul. Reading and Writing 33:9 ► pp. 2391 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.