Cover not available
Article published In:
Writing Systems: Past, present (… and future?)
Edited by Terry Joyce and Robert Crellin
[Written Language & Literacy 22:2] 2019
► pp. 247–279

On the notions of graphematic representation and orthography from the perspective of the Japanese writing system

| Tama University
| Hiroshima Shudo University
This paper addresses two closely related topics for understanding the highly fungible nature of written Japanese. The first is to consider the relative merits of the notions of graphematic representation and orthography with respect to the Japanese writing system (JWS). The second issue is to advocate an inclusive notion of intentionality, which together with the notion of conventionality, provides an approach to thinking about the pervasive nature of graphematic variation within the JWS. Accordingly, the principle Japanese orthographic conventions are outlined in Part 3, while the more substantive Part 4 presents a tentative classification of the various factors of intentionality that also exert considerable influence over contemporary written Japanese.
Keywords: Japanese writing system, graphematic representation, orthography, graphematic solution space, conventionality, intentionality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The terms of writing system, script and orthography
  • 3.Japanese orthographic conventions
  • 4.The intentionality of Japanese graphematic representation
    • 4.1Message context
    • 4.2Script sensibilities
    • 4.3Creative representation
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00028.joy
References (45)
References
Ariga, Chieko. (1989). The playful gloss: Rubi in Japanese literature. Monumenta Nipponica, 44(3), 309–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asahi, Shimbun. (2019). Asahi shimbun no yōgo no tebiki: Kaitei shinpan [Asahi Newspaper’s terminology handbook: Revised edition]. Tokyo: Asahi Shimbun Publications.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Peter. (2018, November 5). A hiragana-kanji mix can make reading a lot easier. Japan Times. Retrieved from [URL]
Backhouse, A. E. (1984). Aspects of the graphological structure of Japanese. Visible Language, 18(3), 219–228.Google Scholar
Brumberger, Eva R. (2003). The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical Communication, 50(2), 206–223.Google Scholar
Bunkachō [Agency for Cultural Affairs]. (2010). Jōyōkanjihyō [Jōyō kanji list]. Available at [URL] (13 September, 2018).
Coulmas, Florian. (1996). The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. (2013). Writing and society: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Eirlys E. (1987). Eyeplay: On some uses of non-standard spelling. Language and Communication, 7(1), 47–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desbordes, Françoise. (1997). The notion of orthography: A Latin inheritance. In Clotilde Pontecorvo (ed.), Writing development: An interdisciplinary view, 117–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Nanette. (1995). Kanji politics: Language policy and Japanese script (Japanese Studies). London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Igarashi, Yuko. (2007). The changing role of katakana in the Japanese writing system: Processing and pedagogical dimensions for native speakers and foreign learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Alphabet. [URL]
Iwahara, Akihiko, Takeshi Hatta, & Aiko Maehara. (2003). The effects of a sense of compatibility between type of script and word in written Japanese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 377–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry. (2011). The significance of the morphographic principle for the classification of writing systems. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 58–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2016). Writing systems and scripts. In Andrea Rocci & Louis de Saussure (eds.), Verbal communication, 287–308. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry, & Susanne R. Borgwaldt. (2011). Typology of writing systems: Special issue introduction. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry, Bor Hodošček, & Kikuko Nishina. (2012). Orthographic representation and variation within the Japanese writing system: Some corpus-based observations. Written Language & Literacy, 15(2), 254–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry, Bor Hodošček, & Hisashi Masuda. (2017). Constructing an ontology and database of Japanese lexical properties: Handling the orthographic complexity of the Japanese writing system. Written Language & Literacy, 20(1), 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Terry, & Hisashi Masuda. (2018). Introduction to the multi-script Japanese writing system and word processing. In Hye Pae (ed.), Writing systems, reading processes, and cross-linguistic influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean languages, 179–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Leonard, & Ram Frost. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Ram Frost & Leonard Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning, 67–84. Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kess, Joseph F., & Tadao Miyamoto. (1999). The Japanese mental lexicon: Psycholinguistics studies of kana and kanji processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Konno, Shinji. (2013). Seishohō no nai nihongo [The Japanese language lacks orthography]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Lurie, David B. (2012). The development of writing in Japan. In S. D. Houston (ed.), The shape of script: How and why writing systems change, 159–185. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Maekawa, Kikuo, Makoto Yamazaki, Toshinobu Ogiso, Takeiko Maruyama, Hideki Ogura, Wakako Kashino, Hanae Koiso, Masaya Yamaguchi & Yasuharu Den. (2013). Balanced corpus of contemporary written Japanese. Language Resources and Evaluation, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mainichi Shimbun. (2015). Mainichi shimbun yōgoshū [Mainichi Newpaper’s glossary]. Tokyo: Mainichi Shimbun.Google Scholar
Miller, Laura. (2011). Subversive script and novel graphs in Japanese girls’ culture. Language & Communication, 31(1), 16–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology-Japan. (1954) Rōmaji no tsudurikata [Rōmaji spelling]. Available at [URL] (13 September, 2018).
. (1986). Gendai kanazukai [Modern kana usage]. Available at [URL] (13 September, 2018).
Neef, Martin. (2012). Graphematics as part of a modular theory of phonographic writing systems. Writing Systems Research, 4(2), 214–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2015). Writing systems as modular objects: Proposals for theory design in grapholinguistics. Open Linguistics, 11, 708–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogura, Hideki, Toshinobu Ogiso, Hanae Koiso, Yutaka Hara, & Sayaka Miyauchi. (2010, March). Keitaiso kaiseki jisho UniDic ni okeru goiso midashi no rikkō hōshin [Criteria for the lemmatization of UniDic], Tokuteiryōiki kenkyū “nihongo kōpasu” heisei 21 nendo kōkai wākushoppu (Kenkyū seika hōkokukai) yokōshū [Priority-Area Research “Japanese Corpus”: Proceedings of the 2010 public workshop]. Tokyo: General Headquarters, Priority-Area Research “Japanese Corpus”.Google Scholar
Robertson, Wes. (2015). Orthography, foreigners, and fluency: Indexicality and script selection in Japanese manga. Japanese Studies, 35(2), 205–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Wesley C. (2017). He’s more katakana than kanji: Indexing identity and self-presentation through script selection in Japanese manga (comics). Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(4), 497–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Henry. (2005). Writing systems: A linguistic approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. (2015). Writing systems (Second edn.). Sheffield, UK: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Sanseidō (2016). Jisho o amu hito ga erabu ‘Kotoshi no shingo 2016’ [This year’s new words 2016: People who edit dictionaries selected]. Retrieved from [URL]
Sebba, Mark. (2007). Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Janet S. (1996). Japanese writing. In Peter T. Daniels & William Bright (eds.), The world’s writing systems, 209–217. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Janet S. (Shibamoto), & David L. Schmidt. (1996). Variability in written Japanese: Towards a sociolinguistics of script choice. Visible Language, 30(1), 47–71.Google Scholar
Taylor, Insup, & M. Martin Taylor. (2014). Writing and literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese (Revised edn.) ( Studies in Written Language and Literacy, 14 ). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tranter, Nicolas. (2008). Nonconventional script choice in Japan. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1921, 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weingarten, Rüdiger. (2011). Comparative graphematics. Written Language & Literacy, 14(1), 12–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetzel, Patricia J. (2018). Resonance in Japanese advertising: The union of text and image. International Journal of the Image, 9(2), 7–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yomiuri Shimbun. (2017). Yomiuri shimbun yōjiyōgo no tebiki: Dai-5-han [Yomiuri Newspaper’s shimbun character and terminology handbook: 5th edn.]. Tokyo: Chūōkōron Shinsha.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Iyengar, Arvind
2023. More matters of typology. Written Language & Literacy 26:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Joyce, Terry & Hisashi Masuda
2023. Chaos or system?. Written Language & Literacy 26:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Chagas de Souza, Paulo
2022. So-called orthographic depth is not always consistent. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Joyce, Terry & Dimitrios Meletis
2021. Alternative criteria for writing system typology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 40:3 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.