On the surface, orthography selection and development are linguistic issues; but in practice they are loaded with imperatives arising from a number of sources. An orthography is constructed as a cultural semiotic, frequently holding sacred status at various levels, and representing the perceived political or technological advancement of one culture over another. This paper proposes a model for understanding the motivations which characterise the orthography selection process. At base, the authority which directs this process reflects a configuration of cultural discourses. Disagreement and imposed change can be explained in terms of conflict within or between discourses; choices which appear inexpedient according to the framework of one discourse become comprehensible from the perspective of the discourse that motivates them.
A Hmong orthography project currently in progress in Coolaroo (Melbourne, Australia) can be seen as highlighting issues common to orthography establishment worldwide. Community representatives are working on the establishment of an orthography originating with the messianic figure Shong Lue Tang, on grounds including national identity, politico-religious allegiance, and linguistic suitability. The image of Shong Lue Tang arises from the hope, expressed throughout Hmong oral tradition, for a Messiah who brings political, spiritual, and literary autonomy to the Hmong. This project and its immediate and historical contexts serve as a case study for the model here proposed.
2010. Editorial Introduction Romanisation in Comparative Perspective. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bow, Catherine
2013. Community-based orthography development in four Western Zambian languages. Writing Systems Research 5:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Chamberlain, Bradford Lynn
2008. Script selection for Tibetan-related languages in multiscriptal environments. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2008:192
Coulmas, Florian
2005. Sociolinguistics,
Coulmas, Florian
2009. Evaluating merit—the evolution of writing reconsidered. Writing Systems Research 1:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Eira, Christina & Tonya N Stebbins
2008. Authenticities and lineages: revisiting concepts of continuity and change in language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2008:189 ► pp. 1 ff.
2020. Till doms över dom. Och över dom andra.. HumaNetten :44
Matsumoto, Mallory E.
2022. Letters of Conversion: Meta‐Alphabetic Discourse and Linguistic Participation in Colonial Highland Guatemala. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 32:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Page, Christina Joy
2013. A new orthography in an unfamiliar script: a case study in participatory engagement strategies. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34:5 ► pp. 459 ff.
Sebba, Mark
2009. Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research 1:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
2008. Missiology and Orthography: The Unique Contribution of Christian Missionaries in Devising New Scripts. Missiology: An International Review 36:3 ► pp. 357 ff.
Unseth, Peter
2008. The sociolinguistics of script choice: an introduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2008:192 ► pp. 1 ff.
Yang, Zheng
2023. How do Chinese scientists maintain their discourse authority? Critical discourse analysis of discourse “boundary work” in genetically modified organisms discussion on a Chinese knowledge-sharing network. Chinese Journal of Communication 16:1 ► pp. 90 ff.
[no author supplied]
2005. Select letters: a major divide. In Sociolinguistics, ► pp. 204 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.