This paper seeks to outline comparative graphematics as a linguistic approach within writing systems research and typology. In addition to providing a general outline of the approach and its benefits, it is exemplified through a discussion of the relation between the gemination of consonant letters and the graphemic representation of long consonants. Two different approaches within comparative graphematics are applied, one that asks about the meaning or function of the units of writing systems and one that starts with linguistic (e.g. phonological or morphological) units or structures and looks at whether they are represented (and, if so, how) in various writing systems. Consequently, two different typological matrices are presented. Moreover, through a combination of historical and comparative perspectives, the paper investigates the diachronic transitions in the functions of a graphemic construction, as observed within the history of a single writing system or in its adoption within several systems. It is shown that an inherited construction, such as the germination of consonant letters, can be reanalysed; if it loses its former representational function during the course of language change, it may subsequently be utilized for different purposes. A construction may also remain as an ‘evolutionary vestige’ within a writing system, at least for some time. Similar forms of reanalysis can be found if a construction is applied to a new language. Keywords: graphematics; orthography; writing system; script; comparative linguistics; cross-linguistic studies; typology; germination
2022. Principles of variation in the use of diacritics (taškīl) in Arabic books. Language Sciences 93 ► pp. 101482 ff.
Pae, Hye K.
2022. Toward a script relativity hypothesis: focused research agenda for psycholinguistic experiments in the science of reading. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 6:2 ► pp. 97 ff.
Joyce, Terry & Dimitrios Meletis
2021. Alternative criteria for writing system typology. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 40:3 ► pp. 257 ff.
2019. The grapheme as a universal basic unit of writing. Writing Systems Research 11:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Meletis, Dimitrios
2023. “Is your font racist?” Metapragmatic online discourses on the use of typographic mimicry and its appropriateness. Social Semiotics 33:5 ► pp. 1046 ff.
Meletis, Dimitrios
2024. Alphabet. In Reference Module in Social Sciences,
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
2017. Towards a typology of phonemic scripts. Writing Systems Research 9:1 ► pp. 14 ff.
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
2021. Brahmi’s children. Written Language & Literacy 24:2 ► pp. 303 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.