Article published In:
Units of Language – Units of WritingEdited by Terry Joyce and David Roberts
[Written Language & Literacy 15:2] 2012
► pp. 165–184
Edited by Terry Joyce and David Roberts
[Written Language & Literacy 15:2] 2012
► pp. 165–184
Offline segmentation and online language processing units
The influence of literacy
Although metalinguistic (‘offline’) awareness of words as linguistic units has been related to literacy, it is still uncertain whether literacy also affects the units of language that people process unconsciously (‘online’). In this contribution, we first discuss the characteristics of offline and online tasks, opening up the perspective that such tasks vary in nature along a continuum ranging from more offline to more online. Subsequently, we present a study employing three relatively more offline and two more online tasks which we conducted among 83 preliterate and 121 literate children at Dutch primary schools. The results of the more offline tasks reveal a significant influence of literacy on segmentation along word-boundaries, while the results from the relatively more online tasks are less clear-cut with respect to the way in which literacy affects language processing. Keywords: literacy; language acquisition; metalinguistic awareness; online and offline task; word-segmentation; language processing; developmental psycholinguistics; Dutch
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Huete-Pérez, Daniel & Pilar Ferré
2023. Individual differences in visual word recognition: the role of epistemically unwarranted beliefs on affective processing and signal detection. Language and Cognition 15:2 ► pp. 314 ff. 
Melogno, Sergio, Maria Antonietta Pinto & Marco Lauriola
2022. Becoming the Metalinguistic Mind: The Development of Metalinguistic Abilities in Children from 5 to 7. Children 9:4 ► pp. 550 ff.
Teberosky, Ana, Angélica Sepúlveda & Otília Costa e Sousa
2020. Orality, Reading and Writing in Early Literacy. In Reading-Writing Connections [Literacy Studies, 19], ► pp. 85 ff.
Huete-Pérez, Daniel, Juan Haro, José Antonio Hinojosa & Pilar Ferré
2019. Does it matter if we approach or withdraw when reading? A comparison of fear-related words and anger-related words. Acta Psychologica 197 ► pp. 73 ff.
Havron, Naomi, Limor Raviv & Inbal Arnon
2018. Literate and preliterate children show different learning patterns in an artificial language learning task. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 2:1-2 ► pp. 21 ff.
HAVRON, NAOMI & INBAL ARNON
2017. Reading between the words: The effect of literacy on second language lexical segmentation. Applied Psycholinguistics 38:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
HAVRON, NAOMI & INBAL ARNON
2017. Minding the gaps: literacy enhances lexical segmentation in children learning to read. Journal of Child Language 44:6 ► pp. 1516 ff.
Olson, David R.
2017. History of Writing, History of Rationality. In Eurasia at the Dawn of History, ► pp. 40 ff.
García, Omar, Anna B. Cieślicka & Roberto R. Heredia
2015. Nonliteral Language Processing and Methodological Considerations. In Bilingual Figurative Language Processing, ► pp. 117 ff.
Ungureanu, Manuela L.
2015. A Momentous Triangle: Ontology, Methodology and Phenomenology in the Philosophy of Language. In Romanian Studies in Philosophy of Science [Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, 313], ► pp. 55 ff.
Ungureanu, Manuela L.
2020. Olson’s Domestication of Goody’s Literacy Hypothesis: (How) Can Philosophers of Language Help?. Interchange 51:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Olson, David R. & Keith Oatley
2014. The Quotation Theory of Writing. Written Communication 31:1 ► pp. 4 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.