Cover not available
Article published In:
The architecture of writing systems
Edited by Kristian Berg, Franziska Buchmann and Nanna Fuhrhop
[Written Language & Literacy 17:2] 2014
► pp. 225–252

What is special about orthographic processing?

| Aix-Marseille University
| CNRS, France
Starting from a generic architecture for reading words in alphabetic scripts, we examine the special status of letters as the building block of single word reading. After briefly describing the overall architecture that defines the interaction between orthographic and phonological processes during silent reading for meaning, we then focus on orthographic processing. We describe the nature of orthographic representations as hypothesized in our approach and we discuss how such representations might be learned during reading acquisition. We present the hypothesis that such learning involves the adaptation of basic object identification mechanisms to the specific constraints of reading, and we provide examples of this adaptation. In the light of this, we then compare the function of letters as constituents of written words relative to the role of object parts in other kinds of familiar visual stimuli (e.g. faces, numbers). We explain why we think letters must have a special status and we provide some preliminary empirical evidence in favor of this special status for letters as parts of words. Keywords: reading; orthography; visual word recognition; orthographic learning; letter strings; object identification
Published online: 22 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.17.2.03gra
References (85)
Adelman, James S. (2011). Letters in time and retinotopic space. Psychological Review 1181: 570–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Petar Milin, Dusica F. Durdevic, Peter Hendrix & Marco Marelli (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review 1181: 438–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bar, Moshe, Karim S. Kassam, Avniel S. Ghuman, Jasmine Boshyan, Annette M. Schmidt, Anders M. Dale, Matti S. Hämäläinen, Ksenija Marinkovic, Daniel L. Schacter, Bruce R. Rosen & Eric Halgren (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1031: 449–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biederman, Irving (1987). Recognition-by-cComponents: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 941: 115–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Binder, Jeffrey R., David Medler, Chris Westbury, Einat Liebenthal & Lori Buchanan (2006). Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. Neuroimage 331: 739–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouma, Herman (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research 111: 459–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouma, Herman & Charles P. Legein (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers. Neuropsychologia 151: 69–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brincat, Scott L. & Charles E. Connor (2004). Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 71: 880–886. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cattell, James M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind 111: 53–65.Google Scholar
Chanceaux, Myriam & Jonathan Grainger (2012). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, symbols, and shapes in peripheral vision. Acta Psychologica 1411: 149–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chanceaux, Myriam, Françoise Vitu, Luisa Bendahman, Simon Thorpe & Jonathan Grainger (2012). Word processing speed in peripheral vision measured with a saccadic choice task. Vision Research 561: 10–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chauncey, Krysta, Phillip J. Holcomb & Jonathan Grainger (2008). Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes 231: 183–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chetail, Fabienne & Alain Content (2012). The internal structure of chaos: Letter category determines visual word perceptual units. Journal of Memory and Language 671: 371–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Laurent, Stanislas Dehaene, Lionel Naccache, Stéphane Lehéricy, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz, Marie-Anne Hénaff & François Michel (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain 1231: 291–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, Max, Kathy Rastle, Conrad Perry, Richard Langdon & Johannes C. Ziegler (2001). DRC: A dual-route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 1081: 204–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dandurand, Frédéric, Jonathan Grainger, Jon-Andoni Duñabeitia & Jean-Pierre Granier (2011). On coding non-contiguous letter combinations. Frontiers in Cognitive Science 21: 136.Google Scholar
Dandurand, Frédéric, Thomas Hannagan & Jonathan Grainger (2013). Computational models of location-invariant orthographic processing. Connection Science 251: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas & Laurent Cohen (2011). The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 151: 254–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas, Laurent Cohen, Mario Sigman & Fabien Vinckier (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 91: 335–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, Stanislas, Felipe Pegado, Lucia W. Braga, Paulo Ventura, Gilberto Nunes Filho, Antoinette Jobert, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz, Régine Kolinsky, José Morais & Laurent Cohen (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 3301: 1359–1364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diependaele, Kevin, Johannes C. Ziegler & Jonathan Grainger (2010). Fast phonology and the bi-modal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 221: 764–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duñabeitia, Jon Andoni, Maria Dimitropoulou, Jonathan Grainger, Juan A. Hernández & Manuel Carreiras (2012). Differential sensitivity of letters, numbers and symbols to character transpositions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 241: 1610–1624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehri, Linnea C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Philip B. Gough, Linnea E. Ehri & Rebecca Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition, 105–143. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Kunihiko (1980). Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics 361: 193–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil-López, Cristina, Manuel Perea, Carmen Moret-Tatay & Manuel Carreiras (2011). Can masked priming effects be obtained with handwritten words? Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 731: 1643–1649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes 231: 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan, Kevin Diependaele, Elsa Spinelli, Ludovic Ferrand & Fernand Farioli (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 291: 1256–1269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan & Stéphane Dufau (2012). The front-end of visual word recognition. In James S. Adelman (ed.), Visual word recognition vol. 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan, Stéphane Dufau, Marie Montant, Johannes C. Ziegler & Joel Fagot (2012a). Orthographic processing in baboons (Papio papio). Science 3361: 245–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan & Ludovic Ferrand (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language 331: 218–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan & Phillip J. Holcomb (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass 31: 128–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan, Bernard Lété, Daisy Bertrand, Stéphane Dufau & Johannes C. Ziegler (2012b). Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition 1231: 280–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan, Arnaud Rey & Stéphane Dufau (2008). Letter perception: From pixels to pandemonium! Trends in Cognitive Sciences 121: 381–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan, Ilse Tydgat & Joanna Isselé (2010). Crowding affects letters and symbols differently. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 361: 673–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan & Walter van Heuven (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In Patrick Bonin (ed.), The mental lexicon, 1–24. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Grainger, Jonathan & Johannes C. Ziegler (2008). Cross-code consistency effects in visual word recognition. In Elena L. Grigorenko & Adam J. Naples (eds.), Single-word reading: Biological and behavioral perspectives, 129–157. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology 21: 54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannagan, Thomas & Jonathan Grainger (2012). Protein analysis meets visual word recognition: A case for string kernels in the brain. Cognitive Science 361: 575–606. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Learning diagnostic features: The delta rule does Bubbles. Journal of Vision 13.8: 17, 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannagan, Thomas, Maria Ktori, Myriam Chanceaux & Jonathan Grainger (2012). Deciphering CAPTCHAs: What a Turing test reveals about human cognition. PLoS One 7.3: e32121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hannagan, Thomas, Johannes C. Ziegler, Stéphane Dufau, Joel Fagot & Jonathan Grainger (2014). Deep learning of orthographic representations in baboons. PLoS One 9.1: e84843.Google Scholar
Haussler, David (1999). Convolution kernels on discrete structure. Technical report UCSC-CRL-99-10, UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Huey, Edmund B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jäkel, Frank, Bernhard Schölkopf & Felix A. Wichmann (2009). Does cognitive science need kernels? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 131: 381–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiyonaga, Kristi, Jonathan Grainger, Katherine J. Midgley & Phillip J. Holcomb (2007). Masked cross-modal repetition priming: An event-related potential investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes 221: 337–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kobatake, Eucaly & Keiji Tanaka (1994). Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 711: 856–857.Google Scholar
LeCun, Yann, Léon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio & Patrick Haffner (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 861: 2278–2324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Christina & Rui Kuang (2004). Fast string kernels using inexact matching for protein sequences. Journal of Machine Learning Research 51: 1435–1455.Google Scholar
Lété, Bernard & Joël Pynte (2003). Word-shape and word-lexical-frequency effects in lexical decision and naming tasks. Visual Cognition 101: 913–948. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levi, Dennis M. (2008). Crowding – an essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Research 481: 635–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lodhi, Huma, Craig Saunders, John Shawe-Taylor, Nello Cristianini & Chris Watkins (2002). Text classification using string kernels. Journal of Machine Learning Research 21: 419–444.Google Scholar
Martelli, Marialuisa, Gloria Di Filippo, Donatella Spinelli & Pierluigi Zoccolotti (2009). Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. Journal of Vision 91: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, Mildred (1982). Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 81: 724–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massol, Stéphanie, Jon-Andoni Duñabeitia, Manuel Carreiras & Jonathan Grainger (2013). Evidence for letter-specific position coding mechanisms. PLoS One 8.7: e68460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Urs, Silvia Brem, Kerstin Bucher, Felicitas Kranz, Rosmarie Benz, Hans-Christoph Steinhausen & Daniel Brandeis (2006). Coarse neural tuning for print peaks when children learn to read. NeuroImage 331: 749–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McClelland, James L. & David E. Rumelhart (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part1: An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 881: 375–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mozer, Michael (1987). Early parallel processing in reading: A connectionist approach. In Max Coltheart (ed.), Attention and perfomance XII: The psychology of reading, 83–104. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Paap, Kenneth R., Sandra L. Newsome & Ronald W. Noel (1984). Word shape’s in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 101: 413–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pelli, Denis G. & Katherine A. Tillman (2008). The uncrowded window for object recognition. Nature Neuroscience 111: 1129–1135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perea, Manolo, Victoria Panadero, Carmen Moret-Tatay & Pablo Gómez (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction 221: 420–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perea, Manuel & Eva Rosa (2002). Does ‘whole-word shape’ play a role in visual word recognition? Perception & Psychophysics 641: 785–794. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perre, Laetitia & Johannes C. Ziegler (2008). On-line activation of orthography in spoken word recognition. Brain Research 11881: 132–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, Conrad, Johannes C. Ziegler & Marco Zorzi (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 114: 273–315. DOI logo
Plaut, David C. & Marlene Behrmann (2011). Complementary neural representations for faces and words: A computational exploration. Cognitive Neuropsychology 281: 251–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plaut, David C., James L. McClelland, Mark S. Seidenberg & Karalyn Patterson (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1031: 56–115. DOI logoX.103.11.56Google Scholar
Primus, Beatrice (2004). A featural analysis of the Modern Roman Alphabet. Written Language and Literacy 7.2: 235–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramscar, Michael & Daniel Yarlett (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science 311: 927–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rescorla, Robert A. & Allan R. Wagner (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In Abraham H. Black & William Frederick Prokasy (eds.), Classical conditioning II, 64–99. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Rastle, Kathy & Marc Brysbaert (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology 531: 97–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumelhart, David E, Geoffrey E. Hinton & Ronald J. Williams (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 3231: 533–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidenberg, Mark S. & James L. McClelland (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 961: 523–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segui, Juan & Jonathan Grainger (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 161: 65–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Share, David L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 551: 151–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Kazushige, Yukako Yamane, Makoto Nishizaki & Manabu Tanifuji (2001). Complex objects are represented in macaque inferotemporal cortex by the combination of feature columns. Nature Neuroscience 41: 832–838. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tydgat, Ilse & Jonathan Grainger (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 351: 480–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinckier, Fabien, Stanislas Dehaene, Mariano Sigman & Laurent Cohen (2007). Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organization of the visual wordform system. Neuron 551: 143–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinckier, Fabien, Emilie Qiao, Christophe Pallier, Stanislas Dehaene & Laurent Cohen (2011). The impact of letter spacing on reading: A test of the bigram coding hypothesis. Journal of Vision 111: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, Peter (1987). Word shape as a cue to the identity of a word: An analysis of the Kucera and Francis (1967) word list. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 39A1: 675–700. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, Carol (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 81: 221–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, David & Dennis M. Levi (2011). Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 151: 160–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widrow, Bernard & Marcian E. Hoff (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. In 1960 IRE WECON Convention Record Part 4, 96–104. New York, NY: IRE.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Johannes C. & Ludovic Ferrand (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 51: 683–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Johannes C., Thomas Hannagan, Stéphane Dufau, Marie Montant, Joël Fagot & Jonathan Grainger (2013). Transposed letter effects reveal orthographic processing in baboons. Psychological Science 20.10: 1–3.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Johannes C., Conrad Perry & Marco Zorzi (2014). Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: no. 1634.Google Scholar
Zorzi, Marco, Chiara Barbiero, Andrea Facoetti, Isabella Longciari, Marco Carrozzi, Marcella Montico, Laura Bravar, Florence George, Catherine Pech-Georgel & Johannes C. Ziegler (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109.28: 11455–11459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (30)

Cited by 30 other publications

Ravenschlag, Anna, Monique Denissen, Lisa Kronbichler & Martin Kronbichler
2025. Orthographic processing. In Encyclopedia of the Human Brain, ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo
Boudelaa, Sami, Dennis Norris & Sachiko Kinoshita
2024. The differential effects of consonant and vowel diacritics in Arabic. Journal of Memory and Language 138 ► pp. 104533 ff. DOI logo
García-Orza, Javier, Ana Calviño & Patricia Carratalá Cepedal
2024. La carga de procesamiento no facilita el acceso a la cantidad en tareas de codificación. CES Psicología 17:2 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Fernandes, Tânia, Eduardo Xavier, Miguel Domingues & Susana Araújo
2022. Where is mirror invariance? Masked priming effects by mirrored and rotated transformations of reversible and nonreversible letters. Journal of Memory and Language 127 ► pp. 104375 ff. DOI logo
Layes, Smail, Kheira Lazar & Soulef Mecheri
2022. Do learning disabilities in reading, spelling and numeracy have common underlying factors? Evidence from Arabic-speaking children sample. Applied Neuropsychology: Child ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Duo, Zhengye Xu & Li-Chih Wang
2022. The Interaction Between Morphological Awareness and Word Detection Skills in Predicting Speeded Passage Reading in Primary and Secondary School Chinese Readers. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Massol, Stéphanie, Jonathan Grainger & Francesca Peressotti
2022. Effects of horizontal displacement and inter-character spacing on transposed-character effects in same-different matching. PLOS ONE 17:3 ► pp. e0265442 ff. DOI logo
Mirault, Jonathan, Stéphanie Massol & Jonathan Grainger
2022. Effects of non-adjacent letter repetition in the same-different matching task. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 37:10 ► pp. 1292 ff. DOI logo
Winsler, Kurt, Jonathan Grainger & Phillip J. Holcomb
2022. On letter-specific crowding and reading: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia 176 ► pp. 108396 ff. DOI logo
Yeaton, Jeremy D. & Jonathan Grainger
2022. Positional cueing, string location variability, and letter-in-string identification. Acta Psychologica 223 ► pp. 103510 ff. DOI logo
Fernández‐López, María, Ana Marcet & Manuel Perea
2021. Does orthographic processing emerge rapidly after learning a new script?. British Journal of Psychology 112:1 ► pp. 52 ff. DOI logo
Kerr, Emilia, Jonathan Mirault & Jonathan Grainger
2021. On non-adjacent letter repetition and orthographic processing: Lexical decisions to nonwords created by repeating or inserting letters in words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:2 ► pp. 596 ff. DOI logo
Ventura, Paulo, Tânia Fernandes, Alexandre Pereira, José C. Guerreiro, António Farinha-Fernandes, João Delgado, Miguel F. Ferreira, Bruno Faustino, Isabel Raposo & Alan C.-N. Wong
2020. Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 82:5 ► pp. 2739 ff. DOI logo
Viterbo, Goni, Tami Katzir & Liat Goldfarb
2020. Accelerating reading via local priming. Acta Psychologica 205 ► pp. 103056 ff. DOI logo
Dotan, Dror & Naama Friedmann
2019. Separate mechanisms for number reading and word reading: Evidence from selective impairments. Cortex 114 ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Ktori, Maria, Daisy Bertrand & Jonathan Grainger
2019. What’s special about orthographic processing? Further evidence from transposition effects in same-different matching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:7 ► pp. 1780 ff. DOI logo
Lafontaine, Hélène & Régine Kolinsky
2019. Reading by extracting invariant line junctions in typical and atypical young readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 183 ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Rakhlin, Natalia V., Catalina Mourgues, Cláudia Cardoso-Martins, Alexander N. Kornev & Elena L. Grigorenko
2019. Orthographic processing is a key predictor of reading fluency in good and poor readers in a transparent orthography. Contemporary Educational Psychology 56 ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Grainger, Jonathan
2018. Orthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’ vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:2 ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo
Grainger, Jonathan
2024. Letters, Words, Sentences, and Reading. Journal of Cognition 7:1 DOI logo
Grainger, Jonathan & Elisabeth Beyersmann
2017. Edge-Aligned Embedded Word Activation Initiates Morpho-orthographic Segmentation [Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 67], ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Linke, Maja, Franziska Bröker, Michael Ramscar, Harald Baayen & Thomas Wennekers
2017. Are baboons learning "orthographic" representations? Probably not. PLOS ONE 12:8 ► pp. e0183876 ff. DOI logo
Schubert, Teresa, Nicholas Badcock & Saskia Kohnen
2017. Development of children’s identity and position processing for letter, digit, and symbol strings: A cross-sectional study of the primary school years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 162 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Schubert, Teresa, Sachiko Kinoshita & Dennis Norris
2017. What Causes the Greater Perceived Similarity of Consonant-Transposed Nonwords?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology ► pp. 17470218.2016.1 ff. DOI logo
Schubert, Teresa M.
2017. Why are digits easier to identify than letters?. Neuropsychologia 95 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Tóth, Dénes & Valéria Csépe
2017. Adaptive specialization in position encoding while learning to read. Developmental Science 20:3 DOI logo
Eddy, Marianna D., Jonathan Grainger, Phillip J. Holcomb & John D. E. Gabrieli
2016. Orthographic and phonological processing in developing readers revealed by ERPs. Psychophysiology 53:12 ► pp. 1776 ff. DOI logo
Grainger, Jonathan, Stéphane Dufau & Johannes C. Ziegler
2016. A Vision of Reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20:3 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Leibnitz, Laurie, Jonathan Grainger, Mathilde Muneaux & Stéphanie Ducrot
2016. Processus visuo-attentionnels et lecture : une synthèse. L’Année psychologique Vol. 116:4 ► pp. 597 ff. DOI logo
Leibnitz, Laurie, Jonathan Grainger, Mathilde Muneaux & Stéphanie Ducrot
2017. Processus visuo-attentionnels et lecture : une synthèse. L’Année psychologique 116:04 ► pp. 597 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.