Cover not available
Part of
The Politics of Multilingualism: Europeanisation, globalisation and linguistic governance
Edited by Peter A. Kraus and François Grin
[Studies in World Language Problems 6] 2018
► pp. 65–88

Chapter 4
The impact of mobility and migration on the identity-constructing policy in Brussels

| Vrije Universiteit Brussel – POLI-BRIO
The Belgian model is based upon monolingual territories and the integrative power of the two traditional “imagined communities” of Dutch and French speakers. The institutionalisation of this policy in the 1970 led to a particular political model without a national language, national political parties, national education or national media.
For Brussels, this resulted in a complex model of dual bilingualism with two language communities and a situation of partial power-sharing. Since then, however, Brussels has been subject to a diversified form of migration which has led to the current situation in which half of the population has non-Belgian roots. This results in a highly multilingual and multicultural environment.
However, this identity-constructing policy based upon the two traditional language groups no longer meets the expectations of this diverse population. This chapter focuses on the confrontation between top-down identity-constructing bilingual policy and the framing of the political debate, on the one hand, and the sense of belonging in a multilingual and multicultural setting, on the other.
Keywords: language policy, multilingualism, Brussels
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The basis of Belgian language policy: From a personality to a territoriality principle
  • 3.Urban bilingualism according to Brussels standards
  • 4.From bilingual to multilingual Brussels
  • 5.The end of traditional language socialisation
  • 6.Language, identification and political consequences
  • 7.The spearhead function of civil society
  • 8.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.6.04jan
References (28)
References
Anderson, Benedict (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services (CSES) (2013). Study on Practices of Integration of Third-Country Nationals at Local and Regional Level in the European Union. Brussels: European Union,.Google Scholar
Clyne, Michael, and Sandra Kipp (1999). Pluricentric Languages in an Immigrant Context: Spanish, Arabic and Chinese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Constanzo, Joseph, and Fatima Zibouh (2014). “Mobilisation Strategies of Individual and Institutional Actors in Brussels’ Artistic and Cultural Scenes”, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 21 (1): 42–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Metsenaere, Machteld (1990). “Thuis in gescheiden werelden. De migratoire en sociale aspecten van verfransing te Brussel in het midden van de 19e eeuw”, Revue Belge d’Histoire Contemporaine, 21 (3/4): 383–412.Google Scholar
Dewachter, Wilfried (2001). De mythe van de parlementaire democratie. Een Belgische analyse. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Etats Généraux de Bruxelles (2010). La société civile bruxelloise se mobilise. Bruxelles: Le Cri.Google Scholar
Houben, Marc (2005). International Crisis Management: The Approach of European States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Janssens, Rudi (2001). Taalgebruik in Brussel. Taalverhoudingen, taalverschuivingen en taalidentiteit in een meertalige stad, Brusselse Thema’s 8. Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
(2007). Van Brussel gesproken. Taalgebruik, taalverschuivingen en taalidentiteit in het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest. Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
(2013). Meertaligheid als cement van de stedelijke samenleving. Een analyse van de Brusselse taalsituatie op basis van Taalbarometer 3. Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
(2014a). Le multilinguisme urbain: Le cas de Bruxelles. Brussels: Racine Campus.Google Scholar
(2014b). Taal en identiteit in de Rand, Een analyse van de taalsituatie in de Rand rond Brussel op basis van de BRIO-Taalbarometer. Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
(2015). “The Brussels’ Language Conflict: Political Mind-set versus Linguistic Practice”, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 235: 53–76.Google Scholar
Janssens, Rudi, and Joost Vaesen (2015). “In Contact and/or in Conflict? Ethno-cultural Markers, Language and Schooling in Post-war Brussels”, in: C Peersman, Gijsbert Rutten and Rik Vosters (eds), Past, Present and Future of a Language Border: Germanic Romance Encounters in the Low Countries, pp. 255–274. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Javeau, Claude (2016). “Language and Identity Politics in Belgium”, in: Christina Späti (eds), Language and Identity PoliticsLanguage and Identity Politics: A Cross-Atlantic Perspective. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Komter, Aafke, Jack Burgers and Godfried Engbersen (2000). Het cement van de samenleving: een verkennende studie over solidariteit en cohesie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
McAndrew, Marie, and Rudi Janssens (2004). “The Role of Schooling in the Maintenance and Transformation of Ethnic Boundaries Between Linguistic Communities: Contrasting Quebec and Belgium”, Canadian Ethnic Studies / Études Ethniques au Canada, 26 (3): 61–83.Google Scholar
Nassaux, Jean-Paul (2011). Le nouveau mouvement bruxellois, Bruxelles: CRISP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omoniyi, Tope, and Joshua A. Fishman (eds) (2006). Explorations in the Sociology of Language and Religion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smolicz, Jerzy (1981). “Core Values and Cultural Identity”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 4 (1): 75–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). “Language Core Values in a Multicultural Setting: An Australian Experience”, International Review of Education, 37 (1): 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Mensel, Luk (2014). “Language Labels, Language Practices. A Multiple Case Study of Parents with Children Enrolled in Dutch-medium Education in Brussels”, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Namur.
Vertovec, Steven, and Susanne Wessendorf (2010). The Multiculturalism Backlash: European Discourses, Policies and Practices. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witte, Els (2009). Political History of Belgium. Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
Witte, Els, and Harry Van Velthoven (1999). Language and Politics: The Belgian Case Study in a Historical Perspective. Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar
(2011). Languages in Contact and in Conflict. The Belgian Case. Kalmthout: Pelckmans.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Blanckaert, Benjamin
2024. Crossing the Rubicon: Strategies and Motivations behind Cross-ethnolinguistic Vote-seeking in the Brussels Capital Region. Ethnopolitics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Blanckaert, Benjamin & Didier Caluwaerts
2023. Do birds of a feather flock together? Patterns of ethnolinguistic group representation in the Brussels Capital Region. Swiss Political Science Review 29:4 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Blanckaert, Benjamin & Didier Caluwaerts
2024. Out of Many, One? Exploring Ethnolinguistic Identity Appeals in the Brussels Capital Region. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 54:4 ► pp. 683 ff. DOI logo
Garibova, Jala
2022. The Azerbaijani Diaspora in Turkey: Integration, Reintegration, and the Production of Identity. Nationalities Papers 50:4 ► pp. 770 ff. DOI logo
Schutter, Helder De
2021. Personality and territoriality in theory and in Belgium. Language Problems and Language Planning 45:2 ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.