Cover not available
Part of
A Language Management Approach to Language Problems: Integrating macro and micro dimensions
Edited by Goro Christoph Kimura and Lisa Fairbrother
[Studies in World Language Problems 7] 2020
► pp. 1–28

Chapter 1
Introduction

What is a language management approach to language problems and why do we need it?

| Sophia University
| Sophia University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.What is language management and why is it a useful concept?
  • 3.The position of LMT in relation to other approaches to language policy and planning
  • 4.Conceptualizations of the micro and macro in sociolinguistic research on language problems
  • 5.The conceptualization of the micro and macro in this volume
  • 6.The organization of this volume
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.7.01fai
References (70)
References
Ali, N. L., Baldauf, R. B., Shariff, N. M. M., & Manan, A. A. (2018). Utilisation of language management theory in framing interview pro formas. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 141–156). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Amir, A., & Musk, N. (2013). Language policing: Micro-level language policy-in-process in the foreign language classroom. Classroom Discourse, 4(2), 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, R. B. (2012). Introduction: Language planning: Where have we been? Where might we be going? Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 12(2), 233–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldauf, R. B., & Hamid, M. O. (2018). Language planning “schools” and their approaches and methodologies. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 43–66). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bárat, E., Studer, P., & Nekvapil, J. (2013). Ideological conceptualizations of language: Discourses of linguistic diversity. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beneš, M., Prošek, M., Smejkalová, K., & Štěpánová, V. (2018). Interaction between language users and a language consulting centre: Challenges for language management theory and research. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 119–140). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bonacina-Pugh, F. (2012). Researching ‘practiced language policies’: Insights from conversation analysis. Language Policy, 11, 213–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calvet, L. J. (1996). Les politiques linguistiques [Language policies]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Chua, S. K. C., & Baldauf, R. B. (2011). Micro language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Vol.2 (pp. 936–951). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corder, S. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. (2005). Sociolinguistics: The study of speakers’ choices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. V., & Ziegler, E. (Eds.). (2015). Language planning and microlinguistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dovalil, V. (2011). [Review of the book Language management, by B. Spolsky]. In U. Ammon, J. Darquennes, & S. Wright (Eds.), Sociolinguistica 25 (pp. 150–155). Berlin, Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, L. (2000). Gengokanri moderu kara intāakushon moderu e [Towards a model of interaction management]. In H. Muraoka (Ed.), Sesshokubamen no gengo kanri kenkyū [Research on contact situations and language management] Vol. 1 (pp. 55–65). Chiba: Chiba University Graduate School of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
(2018). Using email interaction reports to gain access to the management cycle: A study of Japanese students during study abroad. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 259–282). Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairbrother, L., & Masuda, Y. (2012). Simple management in contact situations: What factors determine whether a deviation will be noted or not? Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 22(2), 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairbrother, L., Nekvapil, J., & Sloboda, M. (Eds.). (2018). The language management approach: A focus on research methodology. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1972). The sociology of language: An interdisciplinary social science approach to language in society. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1987). Blessings of Babel: Bilingualism and language planning: Problems and pleasures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2011). The ethnography of language policy. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 273–289). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hult, F. M. (2010). Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 202, 7–24.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1972). Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals (2nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. H. (1993). Language planning from a management perspective: An interpretation of findings. In E. H. Jahr (Ed.), Language conflict and language planning (pp. 133–142). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Epilogue. An apology for language management theory. In J. Nekvapil & T. Sherman (Eds.), Language management in contact situations: Perspectives from three continents (pp. 245–252). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2010). [Review of the book Language management, by B. Spolsky]. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(1), 83–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jernudd, B. H., & Neustupný, J. V. (1987). Language planning: For whom? In L. Laforge (Ed.), Proceedings of the international colloquium on language planning (pp. 69–84). Quebec: Les Presses de L’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Research methods in language policy and planning. In J. W. Tollefson & M. Perez-Milans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 51–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. B., & Baldauf, R. B. (1997). Language planning. From practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kasuya, K. (1999). Gengoninshiki to gengoseisaku: Shizenshugi to jiyūshugi no kansei [Language conceptions and language policy: The pitfalls of naturalism and liberalism]. In H. Shoji (Ed.), Kotoba no 20seiki [Languages in the 20th century] (pp. 64–77). Tokyo: Domesu.Google Scholar
Kikuchi, K. (2010). Research overviews and prospects for sign language conversations. In H. Muraoka (Ed.), Language management and transitioning contact situations. Language management in contact situations Vol. 8, Report on research projects No. 228 (pp. 15–24). Chiba: Chiba University, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Kimura, G. C. (2005). Gengoseisaku kenkyū no gengokan wo tō: Gengokeikaku/gengotaido no nibunhō kara gengokanri no riron e [How do researchers on language policy perceive language?: From the language planning / language attitude dichotomy to language management theory]. Gengoseisaku [Language Policy], 1, 1–13. [URL]
(2013). [Review of the book Language management in contact situations: Perspectives from three continents, by J. Nekvapil & T. Sherman (Eds.)]. Linguistica Pragensia, 23(1), 69–74.Google Scholar
(2014). Language management as a cyclical process: A case study on prohibiting Sorbian in the workplace. Slovo a slovesnost, 75(4), 255–270.Google Scholar
(2015). [Review of the book Ideological conceptualizations of language: Discourses of linguistic diversity, by E. Bárat, P. Studer & J. Nekvapil (Eds.)]. Linguistica Pragensia, 25(2), 179–183.Google Scholar
(2017a). The role of language ideology in norm negotiation. Working Papers in Language Management, 2. Retrieved from [URL]
(2017b). Signs of de-territorialization?: Linguistic landscape at the German-Polish border. Eurasia Border Review, 8, 45–58.Google Scholar
Lanstyák, I. (2014). On the process of language problem management. Slovo a slovesnost, 75, 325–351.Google Scholar
(2018). On the strategies of managing language problems. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 67–100). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marriott, H. E., & Nekvapil, J. (Eds.). (2012). Language management approach: Probing the concept of “noting” [Special issue]. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 22(2).Google Scholar
Martin-Jones, M., & da Costa Cabral, I. (2018). The critical ethnographic turn in research on language policy and planning. In J. W. Tollefson & M. Perez-Milans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 71–92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L. (Ed.). (2011). Ethnography and language policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muraoka, H., Fan, S. K., & Ko, M. (2018). Methodological considerations for the study of accustomed language management: An ethnographic approach. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 201–230). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nekula, M., Sherman, T., & Zawiszová, H. (Eds.). (forthcoming). Interests and power in language management. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Nekvapil, J. (2000). Language management in a changing society: Sociolinguistic remarks from the Czech Republic. In B. Panzer (Ed.), Die sprachliche Situation in der Slavia zehn Jahre nach der Wende [The situation of Slavic languages ten years after the transformation] (pp. 165–177). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2006). From language planning to language management. Sociolinguistica, 20, 92–104.Google Scholar
(2009). The integrative potential of language management theory. In J. Nekvapil & T. Sherman (Eds.), Language management in contact situations: Perspectives from three continents (pp. 1–11). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2012). Some thoughts on “noting” in language management theory and beyond. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 22(2), 160–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Language management theory as one approach in language policy and planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 11–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, J., & Nekula, M. (2006). On language management in multinational companies in the Czech Republic. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2–3), 307–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, J., & Sherman, T. (Eds.). (2009). Language management in contact situations: Perspectives from three continents. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(Eds.). (2015). Special issue: The language management approach: Perspectives on the interplay of bottom-up and top-down. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 232.Google Scholar
Neustupný, J. V. (1978). Post-structural approaches to language: Language theory in a Japanese context. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
(1985). Problems in Australian-Japanese contact situations. In J. B. Pride (Ed.), Cross-cultural encounters: Communication and miscommunication (pp. 44–84). Melbourne: River Seine.Google Scholar
(1994). Problems of English contact discourse and language planning. In T. Kandiah & J. Kwan-Terry (Eds.), English and language planning: A Southeast Asian contribution (pp. 50–69). Singapore: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1997). Gengo kanri to komyuniti gengo no shomondai [Language management and issues of community languages]. In Tagengo, tabunka komyuniti no tame no gengo kanri: Sai o ikiru kojin to komyuniti [Language management for multilingual and multicultural communities: Individuals and communities which live the difference] (pp. 21–37). Tokyo: National Language Research Institute.Google Scholar
(1999). Následné (follow-up) interview. Slovo a slovesnost, 60(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
(2003). Japanese students in Prague. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 162, 125–143.Google Scholar
(2004). A theory of contact situations and the study of academic interaction. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 14(1), 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanden, G. R. (2014). Language management x 3: A theory, a sub-concept, and a business strategy tool. Applied Linguistics, 37, 520–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlieben-Lange, B. (1973). Soziolinguistik. Eine Einführung [Sociolinguistics: An introduction]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Sherman, T. (2016). Language management and language management theory [LMT]. In A. Linn (Ed.), Investigating English in Europe: Contexts and agendas (pp. 192–199). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sloboda, M. (2010). [Review of the book Language management, by B. Spolsky]. LINGUIST List, 21 (227).Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Švelch, J. (2015). Excuse my poor English: Language management in English-language online discussion forums. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 232, 143–175.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. W. (Ed.). (2002). Language policies in education: Critical issues. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. W., & Perez-Milans, M. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Erdocia, Iker, Susanna Nocchi & Mary Ruane
2024. Ideas, power and agency: policy actors and the formulation of language-in-education policy for multilingualism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 45:7 ► pp. 2848 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Kathy & Sunyoung Yang
2024. Radical cyberfeminists as language planners: South Korea’s Womad. Current Issues in Language Planning 25:4 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Dovalil, Vít
2022. Metalinguistic activities as a focus of sociolinguistic research: Language Management Theory, its potential, and fields of application. Sociolinguistica 36:1-2 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.