Cover not available
Part of
A Language Management Approach to Language Problems: Integrating macro and micro dimensions
Edited by Goro Christoph Kimura and Lisa Fairbrother
[Studies in World Language Problems 7] 2020
► pp. 255–267

Chapter 13
Epilogue

Reconsidering the language management approach in light of the micro-macro continuum

| Sophia University
| Sophia University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The scope of LMT and its geographical spread
  • 3.Insights into the LM process
    • 3.1Attention to norms as a pre-stage to LM
    • 3.2Attention to the post-implementation stage
  • 4.Linking the various dimensions: Insights from the studies in this volume
    • 4.1The intertwining of the elements of the micro-macro continuum
    • 4.2The contributions of the individual chapters
  • 5.The maxim of cross-dimensional analysis
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 20 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.7.13kim
References (24)
References
Ali, N. L., Baldauf, R. B., Shariff, N. M. M., & Manan, A. A. (2018). Utilisation of language management theory in framing interview pro formas. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 141–156). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Beneš, M., Prošek, M., Smejkalová, K., & Štěpánová, V. (2018). Interaction between language users and a language consulting centre: Challenges for language management theory and research. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 119–140). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, L., Nekvapil, J., & Sloboda, M. (2018). Methodology in language management research. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 15–39). Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
He, S., & Dai, M. (2016). “语言管理理论”：源流与发展 [Language management theory: Origins and developments]. 语言规划学研究 / Journal of Language Planning, 2 (1), 32–45.Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. H., & Neustupný, J. V. (1987). Language planning: For whom? In L. Laforge (Ed.), Proceedings of the international colloquium on language planning (pp. 69–84). Quebec: Les Presses de L’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. C. (2013). Language policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanstyák, I. (2014). On the process of language problem management. Slovo a slovesnost, 75(4), 325–351.Google Scholar
(2018). On the strategies of managing language problems. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on methodology (pp. 67–97). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marriott, H. E. (2015). The management of academic discourse acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 232, 103–119.Google Scholar
Muraoka, H., Fan, S. K., & Ko, M. (2018). Methodological considerations for the study of accustomed language management: An ethnographic approach. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 201–230). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nekvapil, J. (2012). Some thoughts on “noting” in language management theory and beyond. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 22(2), 160–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Language management theory as one approach in language policy and planning. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 11–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nekvapil, J., & Sherman, T. (2009). Pre-interaction management in multinational companies in Central Europe. Current Issues in Language Planning, 10, 181–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Jazykový management a teorie jazykového managementu: úvodní poznámky [Language management and Language Management Theory]. Slovo a slovesnost, 75(4), 245–254.Google Scholar
Neustupný, J. V. (1985). Language norms in Australian-Japanese contact situations. In M. Clyne (Ed.), Australia, meeting place of languages (p. 161–170). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
(2003). Japanese students in Prague. Problems of communication and interaction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 162, 125–143.Google Scholar
(2004). A theory of contact situations and the study of academic interaction. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 14 (1), 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Foreigners and the Japanese in contact situations: Evaluation of norm deviations. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 175/176, 307–323.Google Scholar
(2012). Theory and practice in language management. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 22 (2), 295–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). The historical position of Language Management Theory. In L. Fairbrother, J. Nekvapil, & M. Sloboda (Eds.), The language management approach: A focus on research methodology (pp. 371–378). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Neustupný, J. V., & Nekvapil, J. (2003). Language management in the Czech Republic. Current Issues in Language Planning, 4(3&4), 181–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Q. (2016). Saving Shanghai dialect: A case for bottom-up language planning in China. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5–6), 713–722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tollefson, J. W., & Perez-Milans, M. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zawiszová, H. (2014). [Review of the book Sesshoku bamen ni okeru gengo shiyō to gengo taido / Language use and language attitude in contact situations, by H. Muraoka (Ed.)]. Slovo a slovesnost, 75(4), 352–357.Google Scholar