Cover not available
Part of
Contested Languages: The hidden multilingualism of Europe
Edited by Marco Tamburelli and Mauro Tosco
[Studies in World Language Problems 8] 2021
► pp. 41–56

Chapter 3
Democracy

A threat to language diversity?

| University of Turin
This chapter argues that democracy has both theoretical and practical implications that negatively affect the maintenance of language (and cultural) diversity. Attention is paid to the levelling effects of welfare policies, which tend to depress the speakers’ interest in language preservation and transmission and which typically negatively affect the quality of revitalisation programmes. The presentation discusses the practical and theoretical problems posed by possible ways out such as a voluntary, self-imposed “boundary maintenance” policy (Fishman 1991) and “the creation of linguistic fortresses or ghettoes” (Laponce 1984) in order to protect a minority language. Further, it argues that the democratic state – in itself just the last instalment of the nation-state – may have a special problem with multilingualism, and that language diversity possibly fared better in past forms of government.
Article outline
  • 1.The difficult life of the objects of the third kind
  • 2.The unstoppable aggrandisement of government
  • 3.Language and welfare
  • 4.Neutering diversity
  • 5.Language-preserving boundaries?
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.8.03tos
References (25)
References
Austin, Peter. 2014. And they still speak Diyari: the life history of an endangered language. Ethnorêma 10: 1–17.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de, Dominique Julia, and Jacques Revel. 2002 [1975]. Une politique de la langue. La Révolution française et les patois: l’enquête Grégoire. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Church, Jeffrey and Ian King. 1993. Bilingualism and network externalities. Canadian Journal of Economics 26 (2): 337–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1988. Language spread and language policy for endangered languages. In Language spread and language policy: issues, implications, and case studies. Proceedings of the Georgetwon University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, ed. by Peter H. Lowenberg, 1–15. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Grin, François. 1999. Market forces, language spread and linguistic diversity. In Language, a right and a resource: approaching linguistic human rights, ed. by Miklós Kontra, Robert Phillipson, Tove Skutnabb-Kangas, and Tibor Várady, 169–186. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Grin, François and François Vaillancourt. 2000. On the financing of language policies and distributive justice. In Rights to language: equity, power, and education. Celebrating the 60th birthday of Tove Skutmabb-Kangas, ed. by Robert Phillipson, 102–110. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. 1997. Political unification: a generalised progression theorem. Journal of Libertarian Studies 13 (1): 81–96.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. Sprachwandel (2. Auflage). Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
Laitin, David D. 1977. Politics, language, and thought. The Somali experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1992. Language repertoires and state construction in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laponce, Jean A. 1984. Langue et territoire. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval (English translation: Languages and their territories . Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 1987).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1882 [1861]. Considerations on representative government. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Mises, Ludwig von. 1996. Human action: a treatise on economics. San Francisco: Fox & Wilkes [original: New Haven, Conn.: 1949].Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel and Suzanne Romaine. 2000. Vanishing voices: the extinction of the world’s languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rannut, Mart. 1999. The Common language problem. In Language, a right and a resource: Approaching linguistic human rights, ed. by Miklós Kontra, Robert Phillipson, Tove Skutnabb-Kangas, and Tibor Várady: 99–114. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. 1999. Linguistic diversity, human rights and the “free” market. In Language, a right and a resource: approaching linguistic human rights, ed. by Miklós Kontra, Robert Phillipson, Tove Skutnabb-Kangas, and Tibor Várady, 187–222. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Tosco, Mauro. 2011a. The nation-state and language diversity. In Multilingualism. Language, power, and knowledge, ed. by Paolo Valore, 87–101. Pisa: Edistudio.Google Scholar
. 2011b. On language, government, and the reduction of linguistic diversity. In “He bitaney lagge.” Studies on language and African linguistics in honour of Marcello Lamberti, ed. by Luca Busetto, Roberto Sottile, Livia Tonelli and Mauro Tosco, 211–230. Milano: Qu.A.S.A.R.Google Scholar
. 2014. The tension between language diversity and state building in Africa. Incontri Linguistici 37: 169–180.Google Scholar
. 2015. Arabic, and a few good words about empires (but not all of them). In Language empires in comparative perspective, ed. by Christel Stolz, 17–39. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Language diversity, development, and the state. In Lingua, politica, cultura: serta gratulatoria in honorem Renato Corsetti, ed. by Federico Gobbo, 40–46. New York: Mondial Books.Google Scholar
. 2018. From dialect to language and back: the case of Piedmontese. In: Identity and dialect performance: a study of communities and dialects, ed. by Reem Bassiouney, 86–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna. 1978. Invisible-hand explanations. Synthese 39: 263–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. 1997 [1968]. Science, politics, and gnosticism. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Gateway.Google Scholar