Cover not available
Part of
Contested Languages: The hidden multilingualism of Europe
Edited by Marco Tamburelli and Mauro Tosco
[Studies in World Language Problems 8] 2021
► pp. 247–268

Chapter 15
The language ideology of Esperanto

From the world language problem to balanced multilingualism

| University of Amsterdam
The status of Esperanto, the language launched by Zamenhof in 1887, has been contested since its beginning. Esperanto became the most relevant of the International Auxiliary Languages (IALs) from a sociolinguistic perspective, as it successfully survived two World Wars in spite of being explicitly persecuted by Hitler and Stalin, among others (Lins 2017). The motivations of the pioneers of Esperanto were put under scrutiny according to the different political context, both across time and place (Forster 1982). Therefore, its language ideology was adapted in order to reduce the level of contestedness of the language, and this adaptation re-framed the self-perception of its speakers and their attitudes toward Esperanto itself. For instance, before the Great War in Europe there was a strong connection between the Esperanto movement and pacifism (Alcalde 2015), while in the 1930s in China and Japan Esperanto was linked to anarchism and communism (Lins 2008). In the aftermath of the Second World War, the language ideology deeply changed (Jordan 1987), and the link between Esperanto and linguistic rights became increasingly stronger (Pietiläinen 2010). Nowadays, the new generation of Esperantists is facing the new challenges of the Digital Era. In particular, there is an ideological convergence with other contested languages, in particular Regional and Minority Languages, also in the Esperanto speaker’s attitudes (Caligaris 2016; Gobbo and Miola 2016). This chapter aims to illustrate the evolution of the language ideology of Esperanto, in comparison with other contested languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Is Esperanto a contested language?
  • 3.The tradition of Esperanto: One language, several ideologies
  • 4.Multilingualism and Esperanto: A complex relation
  • 5.Esperanto and linguistic rights in the Digital Era
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.8.15gob
References (46)
References
Alcalde, Xavier. 2015. The practical internationalism of Esperanto. Peace in Progress 24.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Caligaris, Irene. 2016. Una lingua per tutti, una lingua di nessun paese: una ricerca sul campo sulle identità esperantiste. Torino: Aracne.Google Scholar
Cravens, Thomas D. 2014. Italia linguistica and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. Forum Italicum 48 (2): 202–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrzyński, Roman. 2008. Bona espero: idealo kaj realo. Slovakio: Stano Marček.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2006. Communities of practice. In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, ed. by Keith Brown and Anne Anderson, 683–685. Boston: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ethnologue (2016, June 2). Editorial Action. URL: [URL]
Fantini, Alvino E., and Timothy G. Reagan. 1992. Esperanto and education: toward a research agenda. Washington: Esperantic Studies Foundation.Google Scholar
Fettes, Mark. 1996. The Esperanto community: a quasi-ethnic linguistic minority? Language Problems and Language Planning 20: 53–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing language shift: theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, Peter G. 1982. The Esperanto movement. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garvía, Roberto. 2015. Esperanto and its rivals: the struggle for an international language. Philadelphia: Penn Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gobbo, Federico. 2009. Pianificazione linguistica e lingue pianificate: fondamenti di interlinguistica ed esperantologia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar
. 2015. Interlinguïstiek, een vak voor meertaligheid. Interlingvistiko, fako por multlingveco. Interlinguistics, a discipline for multilingualism. Oratie 532, verschenen in de oratiereeks van de Universiteit van Amsterdam op vrijdag 13 maart 2015. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
. 2015a. Transnational communication in a ‘glocalized’ world: in search of balanced multilingualism. JKI (Język. Komunikacja. Informacja / Language. Communication. Information) 10: 196–208.Google Scholar
. 2016. Approaches to multilingualism of Esperanto speakers. In Perspectives of language communication in the EU, ed. by Eva Poláková, Seán Ó Riain, and Ildikó Vančo, 69–80. Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University of Nitra.Google Scholar
. 2017. Beyond the Nation-State? The Ideology of the Esperanto Movement between Neutralism and Multilingualism. Social Inclusion, 5(4): 38–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Introduction to Interlinguistics. Munchen: Grin Publishing.Google Scholar
Gobbo, Federico, and Emanuele Miola. 2016. Modificare l’immagine linguistica: esperanto e piemontese a confronto. In Représentations sociales des langues et politiques linguistiques. Déterminismes, implications, regards croisés. Actes du Premier Congrès Mondial des Droits Linguistiques, vol. 1er, ed. by Giovanni Agresti, and Joseph-G. Turi, 287–304. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
Gordin, Michael D. 2015. Scientific Babel: How science was done before and after global English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, David K. 1987. Esperanto and Esperantism: symbols and motivations in a movement for linguistic equality. Language Problems and Language Planning 11 (1): 104–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korzhenkov, Aleksander. 2010. Zamenhof: the life, works and ideas of the author of Esperanto. New York: Mondial.Google Scholar
Lapenna, Ivo, Ulrich Lins, and Tazio Carlevaro. 1974. Esperanto en perspektivo. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Large, Andrew. 1985. The artificial language movement. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2009. Esperanto: an East European Contact Language? In Die Europäizität der Slawia oder dies Slawizität Europas. Ein Beitrag der kultur- und sprachrelativistischen Linguistik ed. by Christan Voß and Alicja Nagórko. München / Berlin: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
. 2016. Ĉu infana Esperanto estas natura Esperanto? In Lingua politica cultura: Serta gratulatoria in honorem Renato Corsetti, ed. by Federico Gobbo, 250–258. New York: Mondial.Google Scholar
Lins, Ulrich. 2017. Dangerous language: Esperanto under Hitler and Stalin. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Esperanto as language and idea in China and Japan. Language Problems and Language Planning 32 (1): 47–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Masson, Henri. 1996. Kio estas s.a.t.? Paris: Sennacieca Asocio Tutmonda.Google Scholar
Matthias, Ulrich. 2002. Esperanto – the new Latin for the Church and for ecumenism. Antwerpen: Flanda Esperanto-Ligo.Google Scholar
Melnikov, Aleksandro S. 1992. Specifaj kulturaj scioj de la esperantista kvazaŭetno kaj ilia respeguliĝo en la koncerna lingv(aĵ)o. Rostov-na-Donu.Google Scholar
Minnaja, Carlo. 2007. L’esperanto in Italia: alla ricerca della democrazia linguistica. Padova: il Poligrafo.Google Scholar
Miola, Emanuele. 2017. The misuse of the “language-dialect” opposition in Italy and its consequences in current linguistic research. Paper presented at ICRLIM, Barcelona-Vic 19-21.04.2017.
Nic Craith, Máiréad. 2006. Europe and the politics of language: Citizens, migrants and outsiders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, Robert. 1992. Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pietiläinen, Jukka. 2010. Plurlingvismo kaj Esperanto: Ideologia ŝanĝiĝo en la Esperanto-movado. In La arto labori kune: Festlibro por Humphrey Tonkin, ed. by Blanke, Detlev and Ulrich Lins, 781–792. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Schor, Esther. 2016. Bridge of words: Esperanto and the dream of a universal language. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Sikosek, Ziko Marcus. 2005. Sed homoj kun homoj: Universalaj Kongresoj de Esperanto 1905–2005. Rotterdam: Universala Esperanto-Asocio.Google Scholar
Sikosek, Marcus. 2006. Die neutrale Sprache. Eine politische Geschichte des Esperanto-Weltbundes. Bydgoszcz: Skonpres. Doctoral thesis Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F., and Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2017. Ethnologue: languages of the World. 20th edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: [URL]
Stallman, Richard M. 2002. Free software, free society: selected essays of Richard M. Stallman. Boston: GNU Press.Google Scholar
Street, Brain V. 1993. Culture is a Verb: Anthropological aspects of language and cultural process . In Language and culture: papers from the Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, ed. by David Graddol, Linda Thompson and M. Byram, 23–43. Clevendon: BAAL and Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sutton, Geoffrey H. 2008. Concise encyclopedia of the original literature of Esperanto. New York: Mondial.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Ziko. 2012. Historio de UEA. Partizánske: Espero.Google Scholar
Zamenhof, Ludoviko Lazaro. 1929. Originala verkaro. Redaktis Johannes Dietterle. Leipzig: Ferdinand Hirt & Sohn.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fians, Guilherme
2021. In the Beginning Was the Word. In Esperanto Revolutionaries and Geeks, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.