Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Interdisciplinary Language Policy
Edited by François Grin, László Marácz and Nike K. Pokorn
[Studies in World Language Problems 9] 2022
► pp. 151–170

Chapter 8
Urban multilingualism

Place-making, mobility and sense of belonging in European cities

| University of Amsterdam
| University of Amsterdam
This chapter deals with urban multilingualism from a geographical perspective considering the trade-off between mobility, inclusion, and place-making. Place-making in multilingual cities is influenced by the linguistic diversity among their inhabitants, and the sense of place and sense of belonging fostered at the level of the city as a whole and/or in specific neighbourhoods and public spaces shape the individual’s perceptions of linguistic diversity and multilingualism. The chapter introduces key geographical concepts and approaches before examining the new forms of linguistic diversity in European cities fostered by globalisation, Europeanisation, transnational migration and digitalisation. It presents diverse geographical approaches and methodologies relevant to the study of multilingualism and place-making and focuses on two perspectives. First a humanistic geography of urban multilingualism foregrounds the perceptions and representations of languages in relation to a sense of place and a sense of belonging. One empirical study examines linguistic practices and ideologies in Madrid and Amsterdam among residents with a French or German background, another focused on walks through the linguistic landscape and soundscape of the inner-city of Amsterdam. Second a political geography of urban multilingualism explores local policies and city networks regarding the management of linguistic diversity and the trade-off between mobility and inclusion. It examines in turn local policies focusing on mobility and migration, on social cohesion and on multilingualism. Based on both types of geographical research the chapter underlines the importance of raising awareness of the specificity of the local diversity of linguistic trajectories and repertoires and of the coordination between policies articulated and implemented at different scale levels (European, national, local).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The trade-off between mobility and inclusion, and place-making
  • 3.Geographical concepts and urban multilingualism
  • 4.Geographies of multilingualism and place-making
    • 4.1Geographical approaches
    • 4.2Methods
    • 4.3Illustration 1: Individual strategies to cope with linguistic diversity in the city
    • 4.4Illustration 2: Local authorities and the management of linguistic diversity
      • Local policies regarding mobility and migration, and linguistic aspects
      • Local policies regarding cohesion, and linguistic aspects
      • Local policies regarding multilingualism, and mobility and inclusion
  • 5.Discussion
    • Awareness and knowledge
    • Coordination between levels
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.08mam
References (53)
References
Aitken, Stuart & Valentine, Gill (Eds.) (2015). Approaches to Human Geography: Philosophies, Theories, People, Practices (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blanc, Maurice & Beaumont, Justin. (2005). Local democracy within European urban development programmes. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 96(4), 409–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boix-Fuster, Emili (Ed.) (2015). Urban diversities and language policies in medium-sized linguistic communities. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolt, Gideon & Van Kempen, Ronald. (2013). Introduction Special Issue: Mixing Neighbourhoods: Success or Failure? Cities 35, 391–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breton, Roland. (1976). Géographie des langues. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cianetti, Licia. (2019). Governing the multicultural city: Europe’s ‘great urban expectations’ facing austerity and resurgent nativism. Urban Studies 57(13), 2697–2714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifford, Nicholas, Cope, Meghan, Gillespie, Thomas W. & French, Shaun (Eds.) (2016). Key Methods in Geography (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Duyvendak, Jan Willem & Wekker, Fenneke. (2016). ‘At home in the city? The difference between friendship and amicability’, in V. Mamadouh & A. van Wageningen (Eds.), Urban Europe: Fifty Tales of the City (pp. 23–29). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
El Ayadi, Nesrin. (2021). Linguistic sound walks: setting out possible ways to explore the relationship between linguistic soundscapes and individual experiences of social diversity. Social and Cultural Geography. DOI logo
European Migrant Advisory Board (EMAB). (2019). Ask the People. A consultation of migrants and refugees.Google Scholar
Faist, Thomas. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies 23(2), 189–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Aantónio, Batey, Peter, Te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Bertolini, Luca. (2012). Beyond the Dilemma of Mobility: Exploring New Ways of Matching Intellectual and Physical Mobility. Environment and Planning A 44(3), 688–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. (2006). Contradictions of standard language in Europe: implications for the study of practices and publics. Social Anthropology 14(2), 163–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guma, Taulant. & Dafydd Jones, Rhys. (2019). ‘Where are we going to go now?’, European Union migrants’ experiences of hostility, anxiety, and (non-)belonging during Brexit. Population, Space and Place 25(1), e2198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Malcolm, Phillips, Deborah, Chahal, Kusminder, Hunt, Lisa & Perry, John. (2005). Housing, ‘race’ and community cohesion. Coventry: Chartered Institute of Housing.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Myrte. (2015). Diverse cities and good citizenship: how local governments in the Netherlands recast national integration discourse. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38(10), 1798–1814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob. (2016). Territory, politics, governance and multispatial metagovernance. Territory Politics Governance 4(1), 8–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob, Brenner, Neil & Jones, Martin. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment & Planning D: Society & Space 26(3), 389–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rhys & Lewis, Huw. (2019). New Geographies of Language: Language, Culture and Politics in Wales. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kearns, Ade & Forrest, Ray. (2000). Social cohesion and multi-level urban governance. Urban Studies 37, 995–1017. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, Lid & Carson, Lorna (Eds.) (2016). The multilingual city: Vitality, conflict and change. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lapina, Linda. (2016). Besides conviviality; paradoxes in being ‘at ease’ with diversity in a Copenhagen district. Nordic journal of migration research 6, 33–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mamadouh, Virginie. (2018). The city, the (Member) state, and the European Union. Urban Geography 39(9), 1435–1439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matos Wunderlich, Filipa (2008). Walking and Rhythmicity: Sensing Urban Space. Journal of Urban Design 13(1), 125–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDowell, Linda. (1999). Gender, Identity & Place. Understanding feminist geographies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, Jennie. (2010). Sense and the city: exploring the embodied geographies of urban walking. Social & Cultural Geography 11(6), 575–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Alexander B. (1988). The regional dynamics of language differentiation in Belgium: a study in cultural-political geography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Musterd, Sako & Murie, Alan. (2010). ‘The idea of the creative or knowledge-based city’, in S. Musterd & A. Murie (Eds.), Making competitive cities (pp. 17–33). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Noble, Greg. (2009). ‘Everyday cosmopolitanism and the labour of intercultural community’, in A. Wise & S. Velayutham (Eds.), Everyday multiculturalism (pp. 46–64). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paasi, Anssi. (1996). Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness: the Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Border. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Pahl, Ray E. (1991). The search for social cohesion: from Durkheim to the European Commission. European Journal of Sociology 32(2), 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez del Pulgar Frowein, Carmen. (2016). Porosity of multilingual spaces. Master’s thesis, University of Amsterdam. Retrieved from: [URL]
Pinkster, Fenne & Boterman, Willem. (2017). When the spell is broken: gentrification, urban tourism and privileged discontent in the Amsterdam canal district. Cultural Geographies 24(3), 457–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pred, Allan. (1984). Place as historically contingent process: structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the AAG 74(2), 276–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1990). Lost words and lost worlds : modernity and the language of everyday life in late nineteenth-century Stockholm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Qian, Junxi, Qian, Lyun & Zhu, Hung. (2012). Representing the imagined city: place and the politics of difference during Guangzhou’s 2010 language conflict. Geoforum 43, 905–915. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raffestin, Claude. (1978). La langue comme ressource: pour une analyse économique des langues vernaculaires et véhiculaires, Cahiers de géographie du Québec 22(56), 279–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1981). Pouvoir et communication. Médecine en Hygiène 39(1445), 3936–3941.Google Scholar
. (1995). ‘Langue et territoire. Autour de la géographie culturelle’, in S. Walty & B. Werlen (Eds.), Kulturen und Raum: theoretische Ansätze und empirische Kulturforschung in Indonesien: Festschrift für Professor Albert Leemann. Zurich: Rüegger.Google Scholar
Schultze, Claus J. (2003). Cities and EU governance: policy-takers or policy-makers? Regional & Federal Studies 13(1), 121–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Te Brömmelstroet, Marco, Nikolaeva, Anna, Glaser, Meredith, Nicolaisen, Morten S. & Chan, Carmen. (2017). Travelling together alone and alone together: mobility and potential exposure to diversity. Applied Mobilities 2(1), 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuan, Yi-Fu. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perceptions, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
. (1977). Space and place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
. (1991). Language and the making of place: a narrative-descriptive approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81(4), 684–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uitermark, Justus & Duyvendak, Jan Willem. (2008). Civilising the City: Populism and Revanchist Urbanism in Rotterdam. Urban Studies 45(7): 1485–1504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valentine, Gill, Sporton, Deborah & Bang Nielsen, Katrine. (2008). Language use on the move: sites of encounter, identities and belonging. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33, 376–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wessendorf, Susanne. (2013). Commonplace diversity and the ‘ethos of mixing’: perceptions of difference in a London neighbourhood. Identities 20(4), 407–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2014). ‘Being open, but sometimes closed’. Conviviality in a super-diverse London neighbourhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies 17(4), 392–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Colin (Ed.) (1988). Language in geographic context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (1991). Linguistic minorities, society and territory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. (2008). Linguistic minorities in democratic context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Colin & Van der Merwe, Izak. (1996). Mapping the multilingual city: a research agenda for urban geolinguistics. Journal for Multilingual and Multicultural Development 17(1), 49–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar