Cover not available
Part of
Advances in Interdisciplinary Language Policy
Edited by François Grin, László Marácz and Nike K. Pokorn
[Studies in World Language Problems 9] 2022
► pp. 343–360

Chapter 17
The ontology of the linguistic territoriality principle

A conceptual roadmap

| University of Limerick
| KU Leuven
| University of Geneva
The linguistic territoriality principle is popular both among theorists and practitioners of language policy. But its precise content is notoriously vague. A plethora of different meanings have been attached to it, leading to conceptual and normative confusion. This chapter proposes a novel conceptualization of this principle, in order to operationalize it both for theory and practice. It elaborates a proper definition of the LTP, illustrates its numerous versions and offers a state-of-the-art overview of justifications for and critiques of the LTP. The chapter works out, in short, a full ontology of the LTP, against the background of notions of mobility and inclusion. Our main research question is the following: what is at the conceptual and moral core of the territoriality principle? What are the crucial notions that need to be present in order to meaningfully speak of linguistic territoriality, and why do these notions matter morally? To address these questions, we offer and discuss two metrics that could constitute the core of the LTP: the linguistic coerciveness metric and the linguistic diversity metric. We argue that, although the coerciveness metric is relevant, the diversity metric is at the conceptual core of territoriality, such that we ought to understand linguistic territoriality as fundamentally characterized by linguistic monism, or monolingualism. Finally, we draw implications that such a view of LTP might have for the key concepts of mobility and inclusion.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Political philosophy as an analytical framework
  • 3.The linguistic territoriality principle: An overview
  • 4.The linguistic principles metric: An ontology of territoriality
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 January 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.9.17mor
References (39)
References
Ansperger, Christian & Van Parijs, Philippe. (2002). Ética Económica y Social: Teorías de la Sociedad Justa. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. (2001). Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bauböck, Rainer. (2015). The Political Value of Languages. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18(2), 212–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branchadell, Albert. (2005). La Moralitat de la Política Lingüística. Un Estudi Comparat de la Legimitat Liberaldemocràtica de les Polítiques Lingüístiques del Quebec i Catalunya. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
De Schutter, Helder. (2008). The Linguistic Territoriality Principle – A Critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25(2), 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). ‘Let’s Brusselize the World!’, in A. Gosseries & Y. Vanderborght (Eds.), Arguing about Justice. Essays for Philippe Van Parijs (pp. 199–206). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
. (2014). Testing for Linguistic Injustice: Territoriality and Pluralism. Nationalities Papers 42(6), 1034–1052. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D. & Laitin, David D. (2011). Sons of the soil, migrants, and civil war. World Development 39(2): 199–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, Alain-G. (2012). Temps d’Incertituds. Assajos sobre el Federalisme i la Diversitat Nacional. Valencia: Editorial Afers, Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Grin, François. (1994). ‘Combining Immigrant and Autochthonous Language Rights: A Territorial Approach to Multilingualism’, in T. Skutnabb-Kangas, R. Phillipson & M. Rannut (Eds.), Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination (pp. 31–48). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2011). ‘Using territoriality to support genuine linguistic diversity, not to get rid of it’, in P. De Grauwe & P. Van Parijs (Eds.), The Linguistic Territoriality Principle: Right Violation or Parity of Esteem? Re-Bel E-book 11 (pp. 28–33). Brussels: University Foundation.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz. (1977). The American Bilingual Tradition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Knight, Carl. (2017). ‘Reflective Equilibrium’, in A. Blau (Ed.), Methods in Analytical Political Theory (pp. 46–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. (1989). Liberalism, Community, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship. A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. (2001a). Politics in the Vernacular. Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2001b). ‘Territorial Boundaries: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective’, in D. Miller & S. H. Hashmi (Eds.), Boundaries and Justice. Diverse Ethical Perspectives (pp. 249–275). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laponce, Jean A. (1984). Langue et territoire. Québec: Presses universitaires de Laval.Google Scholar
(2001). Politics and the Law of Babel. Social Science Information 40(2), 179–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levrau, François & Loobuyck, Patrick. (2013). Is Multiculturalism Bad for Social Cohesion and Redistribution? The Political Quarterly 84(1), 101–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Christian & Valentini, Laura. (2016). ‘The Methodology of Political Theory’, in H. Cappelen, T. Szabó Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
May, Stephen. (2014). Contesting Public Monolingualism and Diglossia: Rethinking Political Theory and Language Policy for a Multilingual World. Language Policy 13(4), 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McRae, Kenneth. (1975). The Principle of Territoriality and the Principle of Personality in Multilingual States. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 4, 33–54.Google Scholar
Morales-Gálvez, Sergi. (2017). Living Together as Equals: Linguistic Justice and Sharing the Public Sphere in Multilingual Settings. Ethnicities 17(5), 646–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patten, Alan. (2014). Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. (2012). On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. (2003). ‘Accommodation Rights for Hispanics in the U.S’, in W. Kymlicka and A. Patten (Eds.), Language Rights and Political Theory (pp. 105–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1999a [1971]). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. (1999b). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. (2001). Justice as Fairness. A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Réaume, Denise. (2003). ‘Beyond Personality: The Territorial and Personal Principles of Language Policy Reconsidered’, in W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language Rights and Political Theory (pp. 271–295). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riera-Gil, Elvira. (2016). Why Languages Matter to People: Communication, Identity and Justice in Western Democracies. The Case of Mixed Societies. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis de l’Autogovern.Google Scholar
. (2018). The Communicative Value of Local Languages: An Underestimated Interest in Theories of Linguistic Justice. Ethnicities 19(1), 174–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. (2003). ‘Rawls on Justification’, in S. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (pp. 139–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stojanović, Nenad. (2010). Une conception dynamique du principe de territorialité linguistique. Loi sur les langues du canton des Grisons. Politique et Sociétés 29(1), 231–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. (2000). The Ground Floor of the World. On the Socio-Economic Consequences of Linguistic Globalisation. International Political Science Review 21(2), 217–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). ‘Linguistic Justice for Europe, Belgium and the World’, in B. Raymaekers (Ed.), Lectures for the XXIst Century (pp. 13–36). Leuven: Leuven University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2011). Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velaers, Jan. (2011). ‘On Territoriality, Linguistic Borders and The Protection of Minorities’, in P. De Grauwe & P. Van Parijs (Eds.), The Linguistic Territoriality Principle: Right Violation or Parity of Esteem? Re-Bel E-book 11 (pp. 48–51). Brussels: University Foundation.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rocher, François
2023. La politique linguistique du québec (1969-2022). Revista de Llengua i Dret :79 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.