A doctor’s ethos enhancing maneuvers in medical consultation

Goodnight, G. Thomas; Pilgram, Roosmaryn

doi:10.1075/z.163.10goo

Part of

Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics: In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren
Edited by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
[Not in series 163] 2011
► pp. 135–152

A doctor’s ethos enhancing maneuvers in medical consultation

G. Thomas Goodnight

Roosmaryn Pilgram

Published online: 12 May 2011

https://doi.org/10.1075/z.163.10goo

Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Order by:

Labrie, Nanon & Peter J. Schulz

2014. Does Argumentation Matter? A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Argumentation in Doctor–Patient Communication. Health Communication 29:10 ► pp. 996 ff.

Mitchell, Gordon R.

2023. Covid-19 and public debate over gain-of-function research on potentially pandemic pathogens. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:3 ► pp. 307 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2013. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans

2014. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 517 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.