Chapter 1. Pan symbolicus
A cultural primatologist’s viewpoint
William C. McGrew | Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge
Traditional views of non-human primate communication held that it was hard-wired, involuntary, and emotionally expressive only. All of these conclusions have been proven wrong: chimpanzees use natural vocalisations to signal the nature and location of foodstuffs, that is, spontaneous referentiality. Gibbons signal anti-predator alarm by using song-elements in rule-governed combinations. Chimpanzees show tactical deception in their recruitment screams, tailoring these to the audience. Pant-hoots show local variation that if found in human language, would be called dialects. Males devise individualised courtship routines. Some of these signals become group-typical, and such gestures are neither iconic nor onomatopoeic, but instead are arbitrary. Primatological studies of apes behaving spontaneously show us repeatedly that their communicative and cognitive capacities exceed our anthropocentric expectations.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Hattori, Yuko
2021.
Behavioral Coordination and Synchronization in Non-human Primates. In
Comparative Cognition,
► pp. 139 ff.
Majkić, Ana
2021.
Behavioral Modernity, Evolutionary Synergies, and the Symbolic Species. In
Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution,
► pp. 97 ff.
Hattori, Yuko & Masaki Tomonaga
2020.
Rhythmic swaying induced by sound in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117:2
► pp. 936 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.