Article published in:
Homo Symbolicus: The dawn of language, imagination and spiritualityEdited by Christopher S. Henshilwood and Francesco d'Errico
[Not in series 168] 2011
► pp. 205–224
Chapter 11. Metarepresentation, Homo religiosus, and Homo symbolicus
Justin L. Barrett | Centre for Anthropology & Mind Institute of Cognitive & Evolutionary
Anthropology, University of Oxford
What cognitive adaptation enabled humans to become the distinctively symbolic species that we are? Drawing upon insights from the cognitive sciences and evolutionary psychology, research in cognitive science of religion (CSR) converges on the claim that the ability to form mental representations about mental representations (metarepresentation) is a key factor enabling and encouraging religious expression. Such metarepresentation may also be the key to symbolic behaviour – including linguistic expression – more generally. If so, then the same cognitive equipment that underwrites symbolism also gave rise to religion, and the two could have evolved concurrently.
Published online: 16 November 2011
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.168.11bar
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.168.11bar
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Barrett, Justin L.
Barrett, Justin L. & Ryan G. Hornbeck
Deane-Drummond, Celia
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.