Article published in:
The Discourse Studies Reader: Main currents in theory and analysis
Edited by Johannes Angermuller, Dominique Maingueneau and Ruth Wodak
[Not in series 184] 2014
► pp. 401410
References
Benke, G., and Wodak, R.
2003a ‘The discursive construction of individual memories. How Austrian ‘Wehrmacht’ soldiers remember WWII’. In Re/reading the past. Critical and functional perspectives on time and value, ed. by J. R. Martin, and R. Wodak, 115–138. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003b ‘Remembering and forgetting: The discursive construction of generational memories.’ In At War with Words , ed. by M. N. Dedaic and D. N. Nelson, 215–243. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J.
2005 Discourse . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. A
2004 Analysing Political Discourse . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005‘Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical in­stinct’. In 
A New Agenda in Critical Discourse Analysis , eds. by R. Wodak and P. Chilton, 19–52. ­Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.
2001 ‘Critical Discourse Analysis.’ In Handbook of Discourse Analysis , ed. by
 D. Tannen­, D. Schiffrin, and H. Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2003 ‘The Discourse-Knowledge Interface.’ In Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity, eds. by G. Weiss, and R. Wodak, 85–109. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
2003 Analysing Discourse . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heer, H., Manoschek, W., Pollak, A., and Wodak, R.
eds. 2003 ‘Wie Geschichte gemacht wird.’ 
Erinnerungen an Wehrmacht und Zweiten Weltkrieg. Vienna: Czernin. Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M.
1992Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion von Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart-Bad-Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Laclau, E., and Mouffe, Ch
1985 Hegemony and socialist strategy towards a radical democratic politics . London: Verso.Google Scholar
Martin, J., and Wodak, R.
eds. 2003Re/reading the Past. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 
 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitten, R.
1992The Politics of Antisemitic Prejudice. The Waldheim Phenomenon in Austria. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
1997 ‘Das antisemitische Vermächtnis: Zur Geschichte antisemitischer Vorurteile in ­Österreich.’ In Zur ‘Judenfrage’ im Nachkriegsösterreich. Die Last der Vergangenheit und die Aktualisierung der Erinnerung, ed by R. Mitten, 77–165. Vienna: Project Report, Ministry of Science and Education.Google Scholar
2000 ‘Guilt and Responsibility in Germany and Austria.’ Paper presented at the conference ‘Dilemmas of East Central Europe: Nationalism, Totalitarianism, and the Search for Identity. 
A Symposium Honouring István Déak.’ Columbia University, March 24–25.
Möhring, R.
ed. 2001Österreich allein zuhause. Politik, Medien und Justiz nach der politischen Wende. Frankfurt and Main: IKO-Verlag für interkulturelle Kommunikation.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.
2006 ‘Metaphor scenarios in public discourse.’ Metaphor and Symbol, 21 (1): 28–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M.
2004 ‘‘Wie man eine Nation herbeiredet’. Eine diskursanalytische Untersuchung zur sprachlichen Konstruktion der österreichischen Nation und Identität in politischen Fest- und Gedenkreden.’ Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., and Wodak, R.
2001 Discourse and Discrimination . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wodak, R.
2000a ‘La sociolingüística necesita una teoría social? Nuevas perspectivas en el análisis crítico del discurso.’ Discurso y Sociedad, 2 (3): 123–147.Google Scholar
2000b ‘Recontextualization and the transformation of meanings: A critical discourse analysis of decision making in EU-meetings about employment policies.’ In Discourse and Social Life , ed. by S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard, 185–206. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
2001 ‘The discourse-historical approach.’ In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis , ed. by R. Wodak, and M. Meyer, 63–95. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004a ‘Discourses of Silence: Anti-Semitic Discourse in Postwar Austria’. In Discourse and Silencing , ed. by L. Thiesmeyer, 179–209. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2004b ‘Critical discourse analysis.’ In Qualitative Research Practice , ed. by C. Seale, 
G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, and D. Silverman, 197–213. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2006 ‘Mediation between discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA.’ Discourse Studies 8: 179–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 ‘The Contribution of critical linguistics to the analysis of discriminatory practices and stereotypes in the language of politics.’ In Handbook of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 4, ed. by 
R. Wodak and V. Koller. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Reisigl, M.
2002‘‘…wenn einer Ariel heisst…’ Ein linguistisches Gutachten zur politischen Funktionalisierung antisemitischer Ressentiments in Österreich.’ In Dreck am Stecken. Politik der Ausgrenzung, ed. by Pelinka and Wodak, 134–172. Vienna: Czernin.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., Pelikan, J., Nowak, P., Gruber, H., de Cillia, R., and Mitten, R.
1990 ‘Wir sind alle unschuldige Täter!’ Diskurshistorische Studien zum Nachkriegsantisemitismus. Frankfurt and Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar