Cultivating objects in interaction
Visual motifs as meaning making practices
This chapter explores patterns of repeated orientations to physical objects in interactants’ visuo-spatial and haptic surround. A number of examples are presented from advice-giving activities in various institutional settings, where participants-in-interaction initially draw on material objects at hand while pursuing a particular line of explanation, and then return to these objects at later intervals. The analysis suggests that the objects are afforded representational properties through their being anchored to some referent in the talk, and that participants subsequently draw on these associations for describing, disambiguating or clarifying aspects of the relatively complex procedural frameworks discussed in the settings. This suggests that the temporal stability of material objects available to participants makes them an ideal resource to be developed as visual motifs.
References
Arnold, L
(
2012)
Dialogic embodied action: Using gesture to organize sequence and participation in instructional interaction.
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 269–296.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ciolek, T.M., & Kendon, A
(
1980)
Environment and the spatial arrangement of conversational encounters.
Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 237–271.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H.H
(
1996)
Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enfield, N.J
(
2004)
On linear segmentation and combinatorics in co-speech gesture: A symmetry-dominance construction in Lao fish trap descriptions.
Semiotica, 149(1/4), 57–123.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enfield, N.J., Kita, S., & de Ruiter, J.P
(
2007)
Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures.
Journal of Pragmatics 39(10), 1722–1741.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, J.J
(
1979)
The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
1981)
Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
1996)
Transparent vision. In
E. Ochs,
E.A. Schegloff, &
S. Thompson (Eds.),
Interaction and grammar (pp. 370–404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
2000a)
Action and embodiment within situated human interaction.
Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
2000b)
Pointing and the collaborative construction of meaning in aphasia.
Texas Linguistic Forum, 43, 67–76.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
2003a)
Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In
C. Goodwin (Ed.),
Conversation and brain damage (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
2003b)
Pointing as situated practice. In
S. Kita (Ed.),
Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
2003c)
The semiotic body in its environment. In
J. Coupland, &
R. Gwyn (Eds.),
Discourses of the body (pp. 19–42). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
2006)
Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In
N.J. Enfield, &
S.C. Levinson (Eds.),
Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 97–125). London: Berg.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
2007a)
Environmentally coupled gestures. In
S.D. Duncan,
J. Cassell, &
E.T. Levy (Eds.),
Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, C
(
2007b)
Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities.
Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodwin, M.H., & Goodwin, C
(
1986)
Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word.
Semiotica, 62(1/2), 51–75.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gullberg, M., & Holmqvist, K
(
2002)
Visual attention towards gestures in face-to-face interaction vs. on screen. In
I. Wachsmuth, &
T. Sowa (Eds.),
Gesture and sign languages in human-computer interaction (pp. 206–214). Berlin: Springer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hanks, W.F
(
1992)
The indexical ground of deictic reference. In
A. Duranti, &
C. Goodwin (Eds.),
Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 43–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heath, C
(
1986)
Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, J
(
1984)
A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In
J.M. Atkinson, &
J. Heritage (Eds.),
Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C
(
2003)
Transcending the object in embodied interaction. In
J. Coupland, &
R. Gwyn (Eds.),
Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 43–69). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ho, M
(
1994)
The leimotiv technique in Puccini’s La Boheme, Tosca and Madame Butterfly: A critical examination of transformation processes. PhD dissertation. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchby, I
(
2001)
Technologies, texts and affordances.
Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, E., & Palen, L
(
1997)
Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In
L.B. Resnick,
C. Pontecorvo, &
R. Säljö (Eds.),
Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 22–40). Berlin: Springer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kataoka, K
(
2009)
A multi-modal ethnopoetic analysis (Part 1): Text, gesture, and environment in Japanese spatial narrative.
Language & Communication, 29, 287–311.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kataoka, K
(
2010)
A multi-modal ethnopoetic analysis (Part 2): Catchment, prosody, and frames of reference in Japanese spatial narrative.
Language & Communication, 30, 69–89.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendon, A
(
1972)
Some relationships between body motion and speech. In
A. Siegman, &
B. Pope (Eds.),
Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–216). New York: Pergamon Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendon, A
(
1980)
Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In
M.R. Key (Ed.),
The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendon, A
(
1990)
Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kidwell, M
(
2000)
Common ground in cross-cultural communication: Sequential and institutional contexts in front desk service encounters.
Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 17–37.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koschmann, T., & LeBaron, C.D
(
2002)
Learner articulation as interactional achievement: Studying the conversation of gesture.
Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 249–282.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laursen, L
(
2005)
Towards an embodied grammar: Gesture in tying practices constructing obvious cohesion.
Online proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies
. ENS LSH & ICAR Research Lab.
Lerner, G
(
2002)
Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In
C. Ford,
B. Fox, &
S. Thompson (Eds.),
The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McClave, E.Z
(
1999)
Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech.
Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 855–878.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNeill, D
(
1992)
Hands and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNeill, D
(
2000)
Catchments and contexts: Non-modular factors in speech and gesture production. In
D. McNeill (Ed.),
Language and gesture (pp. 312–328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, L
(
2003)
Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions.
Visual Studies, 18(1), 58–73.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevile, M
(
2007)
Seeing the point: Attention and participation in the airline cockpit. In
L. Mondada, &
V. Markaki (Eds.),
Interacting bodies. Online proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies
. ENS LSH & ICAR Research Lab.
Nishizaka, A
(
2006)
What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment.
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(2), 119–154.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G
(
1974)
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.
Language, 50, 696–735.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, E.A
(
1984)
On some gestures’ relation to talk. In
J.M. Atkinson, &
J. Heritage (Eds.),
Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 266–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Streeck, J
(
1993)
Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech.
Communication Monographs, 60(4), 275–299.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Streeck, J
(
1994)
Gesture as communication II: The audience as co-author.
Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(3), 239–267.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Streeck, J
(
1996)
How to do things with things: Objets trouvés and symbolization.
Human Studies, 19, 365–384.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Streeck, J
(
2009b)
Forward-gesturing.
Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 161–179.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Greer, Tim
2016.
Multiple Involvements in Interactional Repair: Using Smartphones in Peer Culture to AugmentLingua FrancaEnglish. In
Friendship and Peer Culture in Multilingual Settings [
Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, 21],
► pp. 197 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Mortensen, Janus
2017.
Transient Multilingual Communities as a Field of Investigation: Challenges and Opportunities.
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27:3
► pp. 271 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.