Cover not available
Part of
Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond multitasking
Edited by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada and Maurice Nevile
[Not in series 187] 2014
► pp. 109–134

Suspending action

From simultaneous to consecutive ordering of multiple courses of action

| University of Oulu
| University of Oulu
| University of Oulu

This paper examines the interactional management of multiple on-going activities via the use of ‘suspension’. We discuss one practice used in achieving suspension, an action combination where items such as wait or hang on first identify on-going or emerging multiactivity and are followed by talk that somehow addresses the interactional contingencies involved. We show that suspension turns are indicative of participants’ orientation to incompatibility between multiple courses of action or activities. This may be related to such local contingencies as mobility, temporality and the use of different embodied resources. The database consists of approximately 36 hours of audio- and video-recorded everyday interactions in English and Finnish from a variety of situations. The study employs the methodology of conversation analysis.

Published online: 4 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.04kei
References
Arminen I., Auvinen, P., & Palukka, H
(2010) Repairs as the last orderly provided defense of safety in aviation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 443–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Balthasar, L., Bruxelles, S., Mondada, L., & Traverso, V
(2007) Variations interactionnnelles et changement catégoriel: l’exemple de ‘attends’ [Interactional variations and categorial change: The example of ‘attends’]. In M. Auzanneau (Ed.), La mise en oeuvre des langues dans l’interaction [Language use in interaction] (pp. 299–320). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Duvallon, O., & Routarinne, S
(2005) Parenthesis as a resource in the grammar of conversation. In A. Hakulinen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction (pp. 45–74). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esbjörnsson, M., Juhlin, O., & Weilenmann, A
(2007) Drivers using mobile phones in traffic: An ethnographic study of interactional adaptation. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 22(1), 39–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, C.A
(2002) Denial and the construction of conversational turns. In J.L. Bybee, & M. Noonan (Eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C
(1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Time in action. Current Anthropology, 43(S4), S19–S35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M.H
(1996) Informings and announcements in their environment: Prosody within a multi-activity work setting. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 436–461). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, P
(2005) The linguistic neg+pos pattern and two action combinations as resources for interviewee stance taking in news interviews. In L. Kuure, E. Kärkkäinen, & M. Saarenkunnas (Eds.), Kieli ja sosiaalinen toiminta – Language and Social Action. AFinLA Yearbook (pp. 85–107). Jyväskylä: The Finnish Association of Applied Linguistics AFinLA.Google Scholar
(2010) Turn-taking for turntaking: Mobility, time, and action in sequential organization of junction negotiations in cars. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(4), 372–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Movement in action: Initiating social navigation in cars. Semiotica,191(1/4), 147–170.Google Scholar
Haddington, P., & Keisanen, T
(2009) Location, mobility and the body as resources in selecting a route. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1938–1961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haddington, P., & Rauniomaa, M
(2011) Technologies, multitasking, and driving: Attending to and preparing for a mobile phone conversation in a car. Human Communication Research, 37(2), 223–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath C., & Luff, P
(1992) Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1(1-2), 69–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G
(1972) Side sequences. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 294–338). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, S
(2008) Internet use and time use: The importance of multitasking. Time & Society, 17, 283–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, C., & Jones, S.E
(2002) Closing up closings: Showing the relevance of the social and material surround to the completion of interaction. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 542–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Local, J
(2004) Getting back to prior talk: and-uh(m) as a back-connecting device in British and American English. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & C.E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation (pp. 377–400). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, H., & Huiskes, M
(2001) Dutch ‘but’ as a sequential conjunction: Its use as a resumption marker. In M. Selting, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in interactional linguistics (pp. 141–169). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L
(2009) The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food Quality and Preference, 20, 558–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) The organization of concurrent courses of action in surgical demonstrations. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 207–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012) Talking and driving: Multiactivity in the car. Semiotica,191(1/4), 225–258.Google Scholar
Nevile, M
(2004) Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
(2007) Action in time: Ensuring timeliness for collaborative work in the airline cockpit. Language in Society, 36(2), 233–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Interaction as distraction in driving: A body of evidence. Semiotica,191(1/4), 169–196.Google Scholar
Nevile, M., & Haddington, P
(2010) In-car distractions and their impact on driving activities. Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Infrastructure and Transport. Retrieved Feb 28, 2014from [URL].Google Scholar
Rauniomaa, M
(2008) Recovery through repetition. Returning to prior talk and taking a stance in American-English and Finnish conversations. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Humaniora B 85. Oulu: University of Oulu.Google Scholar
Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T
(2012) Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 829–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H
(1992) Lectures on conversation [1964–1972]. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Salvucci, D.D., & Taatgen, N.A
(2011) The multitasking mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1972) Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
(2000) When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 205–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J
(2007) ‘Look’-prefaced turns in first and second position: Launching, interceding and redirecting action. Discourse Studies, 9(3), 387–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephens, K.K., Cho, J.K., & Ballard, D.I
(2012) Simultaneity, sequentiality, and speed: Organizational messages about multiple-task completion. Human Communication Research, 38(1), 23–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T
(2004) ‘No no no’ and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research, 30(2), 260–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F
(2010) Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C
(2011) Embodied interaction in the material world. An introduction. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 1–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, L
(1997) Centers of coordination: A case and some themes. In L.B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 41–62). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, J
(2000) Repetition in conversation: A look at “first and second sayings”. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(4), 407–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, F., Heeman, P., & Kun, A
(2011) An investigation of interruptions and resumptions in multi-tasking dialogues. Computational Linguistics, 37(1), 75–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Avgustis, Iuliia & Florence Oloff
2023. Getting (Others) Involved with Smartphones: Participation in Showing Sequences in Multiparty Settings. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Helisten, Marika
2019. Disjunctively Positioned Problem-Noticings in Managing Multiactivity. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4 ► pp. 318 ff. DOI logo
Hoey, Elliott M.
2015. Lapses: How People Arrive at, and Deal With, Discontinuities in Talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:4 ► pp. 430 ff. DOI logo
Hoey, Elliott M.
2022. Self-authorizing action: Onlet me Xin English social interaction. Language in Society 51:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Hoffmann, Sabine & Giolo Fele
2023. Dealing with missing participants in the opening phases of a videoconference. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Kamunen, Antti
2019. How to Disengage: Suspension, Body Torque, and Repair. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4 ► pp. 406 ff. DOI logo
Rauniomaa, Mirka & Trine Heinemann
2014. Organising the soundscape. In Interacting with Objects, ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Rautiainen, Iira, Pentti Haddington & Antti Kamunen
2023. Nudging Questions as Devices for Prompting Courses of Action and Negotiating Deontic (A)symmetry in UN Military Observer Training. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Rautiainen, Iira & Tuire Oittinen
2024. Negotiating epistemic asymmetries during crisis management exercises: Pre-emptive and corrective practices. Intercultural Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Satti, Ignacio
2023. When it’s “now or never”. Narrative Inquiry 33:1 ► pp. 222 ff. DOI logo
Vatanen, Anna & Pentti Haddington
2023. Multiactivity in adult-child interaction: accounts resolving conflicting courses of action in request sequences. Text & Talk 43:2 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. OKAY across Languages [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 34], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.