Article published in:
Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond multitasking
Edited by Pentti Haddington, Tiina Keisanen, Lorenza Mondada and Maurice Nevile
[Not in series 187] 2014
► pp. 167–190

Attending to a summons and putting other activities ‘on hold’

Multiactivity as a recognisable interactional accomplishment

| Telecom ParisTech
| Telecom ParisTech
Trying to grasp multi-activity within a praxeological perspective, we focus on a set of situations in which participants experiencing some summoning event, such as a phone ring, recognisably ‘put on hold’ some other involvement, and demonstrably orient towards the current relevance of two or more streams of activity. We will endeavour to show (a) the kind of collaborative work through which such a perceptible occurrence is turned into a recognisable event with sequential implications; (b) how a course of action is witnessably put on hold for the recipient of the summons to attend it; (c) how such an accomplishment rests on a variety of interactional devices, through the use of which two streams of action are shaped as recognisable, comparable and competing distinct projects.
Published online: 04 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187.06lic
References
Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P., & Poff, K
(2012) A conceptual typology of multitasking behavior and polychronicity preferences. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 9(1), 59–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1974) Frame analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
González, V.M., & Mark, G
(2005) Managing currents of work: Multi-tasking among multiple collaborations. In H. Gellersen, K. Schmidt, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, & W. Mackay (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2005) (pp. 143–162). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C
(1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Multi-modality in girls’ game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics, 24(10–11), 1621–1649. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J
(1992) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haddington, P. & Rauniomaa, M
(2011) Technologies, multitasking and driving: Attending to and preparing for a mobile phone conversation in a car. Human Communication Research, 37, 223–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S
(2010) Talk in action. Interactions, identities and institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hudson, J., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W., & Erickson, T
(2002). “I’d be overwhelmed, but it’s just one more thing to do”: Availability and interruption in research management. Proceedings of ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4(1), 97–104.Google Scholar
Kaufman-Scarborough, C
(2003) Two perspectives on the tyranny of time: Polychronicity and monochronicity as depicted in Cast Away . The Journal of American Culture, 26(1), 87–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, S
(2010) What do we mean by multitasking? Exploring the need for methodological clarification in time use research. International Journal of Time Use Research, 7(1), 42–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laurier, E
(2000) Why people say where they are during mobile phone calls. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 485–504. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leont’ev, A.N
(1974) The problem of activity in psychology. Soviet Psychology, 13(2), 4–30.Google Scholar
Licoppe, C
(2010) The ‘crisis of the summons’: A transformation in the pragmatics of ‘notifications’, from phone rings to instant messaging. The Information Society, 26(4), 288–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) What does answering the phone mean? A sociology of ringtones. Journal of Cultural Sociology, 5(3), 367–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H
(1973) The nature of managerial work. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Mondada, L
(2008) Doing video for a sequential and multimodal analysis of social interaction: Videotaping institutional telephone calls [88 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), Art. 39. Retrieved Feb 28, 2014 from http://​nbn​-resolving​.de​/urn:nbn:de:0114​-fqs0803390.Google Scholar
(2012) Talking and driving: Multi-activity in the car. Semiotica, 191, 223–256.Google Scholar
Nevile, M
(2004) Beyond the black box. Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
(2012) Interaction as distraction in driving: A body of evidence, Semiotica191, 169–196.Google Scholar
O’Conaill, B., & Frohlich, D
(1995) Timespace in the workspace. Dealing with interruptions. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing (CHI’95) , Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E
(1972) Sequencing in conversational openings. In D. Hymes, & J. Gumperz (Eds.), The ethnography of communication (pp. 346–380).New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
(1979) Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23–78). New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
(1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. In M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 266–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Body Torque. Social Research, 65(3), 535–596.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J
(2005) Introduction: Multi-modal interaction. Semiotica,156(1/4), 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C
(2011) Embodied interaction: Language and the body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wajcman, J., & Rose, K
(2011) Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organization Studies, 32(7), 941–961. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Helisten, Marika
2019. Disjunctively Positioned Problem-Noticings in Managing Multiactivity. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:4 ► pp. 318 ff. Crossref logo
Hoey, Elliott M.
2015. Lapses: How People Arrive at, and Deal With, Discontinuities in Talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:4 ► pp. 430 ff. Crossref logo
Hoey, Elliott M.
2022. Self-authorizing action: On let me X in English social interaction. Language in Society 51:1 ► pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Licoppe, Christian & Julien Morel
2018. Visuality, text and talk, and the systematic organization of interaction in Periscope live video streams. Discourse Studies 20:5 ► pp. 637 ff. Crossref logo
Nielsen, Søren Beck
2021. Interactional integration of talk and note-taking. Psychology of Language and Communication 25:1 ► pp. 145 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.