Part of
From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon
Edited by Mandana Seyfeddinipur and Marianne Gullberg
[Not in series 188] 2014
► pp. 95124
Auer, Peter
2009“Online Syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language.” Language Sciences 31: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet, and Chovil, Nicole
2000“Visible acts of meaning: An integrated message model of language in face-to-face dialogue.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19 (2): 163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbéris, Jeanne-Marie, and Manes-Gallo, Maria Caterina
(eds) 2007Parcours dans la ville. Les descriptions d’itinéraires piétons [Moving in the city. Descriptions of pedestrian itineraries]. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert. 
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condon, William S
1971“Speech and body motion synchrony of the speaker-hearer.” In Perception of Language, Paul M. Kjeldergaard, David L. Horton, and James J. Jenkins (eds), 150–173. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Selting, Margret
(eds) 1996Prosody in Conversation. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fricke, Ellen
2007Origo, Geste und Raum: Lokaldeixis im Deutschen. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1981Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2000“Action and embodiment within situated human interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003“Pointing as situated practice.” In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, Sotaro Kita (ed.), 217–241. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2007“Environmentally coupled gestures.” In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, Susan Duncan, Justine Cassell and Elena Levy (eds), 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, and Selting, Margret
Heritage, John
1984“A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement.” In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds), 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, Jon, and Heath, Christian
2000“Embodied reference: A study of deixis in workplace interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1855–1878. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004“Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, Gene H. Lerner (ed.), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1980“Gesture and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance.” In Nonverbal Communication and Language, Mary Ritchie Key (ed.), 207–277. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1990Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. ­Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam, and Versante, Laura
2003“Pointing by hand in Neapolitan.” In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, Sotaro Kita (ed.), 109–137. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kidwell, Mardi, and Zimmerman, Don
2007“Joint attention as action.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 592–611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, Sotaro
(ed.) 2003Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2003“Interplay of gaze, hand, torso orientation, and language in pointing.” In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, Sotaro Kita (ed.), 307–328. ­Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McNeill, David
1992Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2005 “La constitution de l’origo déictique comme travail interactionnel des participants: une approche praxéologique de la spatialité.” [“The constitution of deictic origo as an interactional work of the participants: Towards a praxeological approach of spatiality”]. Intellectica 41–42: 75–100.Google Scholar
2007a“Interaktionsraum und Koordinierung.” [“Interactional space and coordination”]. In Koordination: Analysen zur multimodalen Interaktion [Coordination. Analyses of multimodal interaction], Arnulf Depperman and Reinhold Schmitt (eds), 55–94. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2007b“Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers.” Discourse Studies 9 (2): 195–226.Google Scholar
2009“Emergent focused interactions in public places: A systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space.” Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1977–1997. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011“Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 542–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012“Deixis: An integrated interactional multimodal analysis.” In Interaction and Usage-based Grammar Theories: What About Prosody and Visual Signals?, Pia Bergmann and Jana Brenning (eds), 173–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mondada, L
2014The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65, 137–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Thompson, Sandra
(eds) 1996Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, Asli
2002“Do speakers design their co-speech gestures for their addressees? The effects of addressee location on representational gestures.” Journal of Memory and Language 46: 688–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1984“On some gestures’ relation to talk.” In Structures of Social Action, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds), 266–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996“Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action.” American Journal of Sociology 102: 161–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
2005“Syntax and prosody as methods for the construction and identification of turn-constructional units in conversation.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, Auli Hakulinen and Margret Selting (eds), 17–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Rossano, Federico
2010“Mobilizing response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
1995“Joint attention as social cognition.” In Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development, Chris Moore and Philip Dunham (eds), 103–130. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 26 other publications

Camus, Laurent & Lorenza Mondada
2021. L’anaphore à distance : enjeux multimodaux, épistémiques et normatifs en interaction. Langue française N° 210:2  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Convertini, Josephine, Francesco Arcidiacono & Céline Miserez-Caperos
2023. Teachers’ interventions in science education at primary school. The role of semiotic resources during argumentative interactions in classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
da Cruz, Fernanda Miranda
2023. Multimodal interaction analysis of non-lexical vocalisations in low-verbal autistic children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 37:4-6  pp. 491 ff. DOI logo
de Dear, Caroline, Joe Blythe, Francesco Possemato, Lesley Stirling, Rod Gardner, Ilana Mushin & Frances Kofod
de León, Lourdes
2023. Socialization of Attention. In A New Companion to Linguistic Anthropology,  pp. 410 ff. DOI logo
De Stefani, Elwys & Arnulf Deppermann
2021. Les gestes de pointage dans un environnement changeant et éphémère : les leçons de conduite. Langage et société N° 173:2  pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Dindar, Katja, Terhi Korkiakangas, Aarno Laitila & Eija Kärnä
Dindar, Katja, Terhi Korkiakangas, Aarno Laitila & Eija Kärnä
2017. An interactional “live eye tracking” study in autism spectrum disorder: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in the study of gaze. Qualitative Research in Psychology 14:3  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Ehmer, Oliver & Daniel Mandel
2021. Projecting action spaces. On the interactional relevance of cesural areas in co-enactments. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 638 ff. DOI logo
Grahn, Inga-Lill
2021. Thanking actions: interactional variation in Swedish-language service encounters in Sweden and Finland. Sociolinguistica 35:1  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Heinonen, Pilvi, Jarkko Niemi & Timo Kaski
2023. Changing participation in web conferencing: the shared computer screen as an online sales interaction resource. Applied Linguistics Review 14:4  pp. 751 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2021. When Gesture “Takes Over”: Speech-Embedded Nonverbal Depictions in Multimodal Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Kusters, Annelies
2017. Gesture-based customer interactions: deaf and hearing Mumbaikars’ multimodal and metrolingual practices. International Journal of Multilingualism 14:3  pp. 283 ff. DOI logo
Lindström, Jan, Catrin Norrby, Camilla Wide & Jenny Nilsson
2019. Task-Completing Assessments in Service Encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:2  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Merlino, Sara
2021. Coordination, attention visuelle et gestes professionnels dans la rééducation de l’aphasie. Langage et société N° 173:2  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2017. Walking and talking together: Questions/answers and mobile participation in guided visits. Social Science Information 56:2  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2017. Freine et braque (.) >maint’nant <. Temps interactionnel et deixis temporelle. Langue française N° 193:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2017. Nouveaux défis pour l’analyse conversationnelle : l’organisation située et systématique de l’interaction sociale. Langage et société N° 160-161:2  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2017. Le défi de la multimodalité en interaction. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XXII:2  pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2018. The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops. Discourse Studies 20:6  pp. 743 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2019. Rethinking Bodies and Objects in Social Interaction: A Multimodal and Multisensorial Approach to Tasting. In Discussing New Materialism,  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza
2022. The Situated and Methodic Production of Accountable Action. In The Ethnomethodology Program,  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Sharma, Bal Krishna
2023. A new materialist perspective to studying L2 instructional interactions in engineering. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26:6  pp. 689 ff. DOI logo
Steensig, Jakob, Maria Jørgensen, Nicholas Mikkelsen, Karita Suomalainen & Søren Sandager Sørensen
2023. Toward a Grammar of Danish Talk-in-Interaction: From Action Formation to Grammatical Description. Research on Language and Social Interaction 56:2  pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Stukenbrock, Anja
2020. Deixis, Meta-Perceptive Gaze Practices, and the Interactional Achievement of Joint Attention. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Yasui, Eiko
2023. Sequence-initial pointing: Spotlighting what just happened as a cause of a new sequence. Discourse Studies 25:3  pp. 409 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.