Article published in:
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 131143
Abramson, A.S
(1972) Tonal experiments with whispered Thai. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Papers on linguistics and phonetics to the memory of Pierre Delattre (pp. 29–44). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bibyk, S., Heeren, W., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M.K
(2013) Asking or telling? Real-time processing of boundary tones. Proceedings of the LSA annual meeting , Boston, January 3–6, 2013.
Boersma, P
(2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.Google Scholar
Cho, T., & McQueen, J.M
(2005) Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics, 22, 121–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J., Grabe, E., & Braun, B
(2004) Larynx movements and intonation in whispered speech [summary of research supported by British Academy grant SG-36269]. Last retrieved on November 18, 2011, from http://​www​.phon​.ox​.ac​.uk​/jcoleman​/project​_larynx​_summary​.pdf
De Cheveigné, A
(2005) Pitch perception models. In C.J. Plack, A. Oxenham, R.R. Fay, & A.N. Popper (Eds.), Pitch – neural coding and perception (pp. 169–233). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Denes, P
(1959) A preliminary investigation of certain aspects of intonation. Language and Speech, 2, 106–122.Google Scholar
Fónagy, J
(1969) Accent et intonation dans la parole chuchotée [Accent and intonation in whispered speech]. Phonetica, 20, 177–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C
(2002) Intonation and biology. In H. Jacobs, & W.L. Wetzels (Eds.), Liber Amicorum Bernard Bichakjian (pp. 59–82). Maastricht: Shaker.Google Scholar
Heeren, W.F.L., & Van Heuven, V.J
(2009) Perception and production of boundary tones in whispered Dutch. Proceedings of Interspeech 2009 , Brighton, 2411–2414.
(2011) Acoustics of whispered boundary tones: effects of vowel type and tonal crowding. Proceedings of the ICPhS , Hong Kong, 851–854.
submitted). The interaction of lexical and phrasal prosody in whispered speech. Crossref
Heeren, W.F.L., & Lorenzi, C
(2014) Prosody perception in normal and whispered French. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(4), 2026–2040. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higashikawa, M., & Minifie, F.D
(1999) Acoustic–perceptual correlates of “whisper pitch” in synthetically generated vowels. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 583–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higashikawa, M., Nakai, K., Sakakura, A., & Takahashi, H
(1996) Perceived pitch of whispered vowels–relationship with formant frequencies: A preliminary study. Journal of Voice, 2, 155–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K.J
(2011) Communicative functions integrate segments in prosodies and prosodies in segments. Phonetica, 68, 26–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kong, Y.-Y., & Zeng, F.G
(2006) Temporal and spectral cues in Mandarin tone recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 2830–2840. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Konno, H., Kanemitsu, H., Toyama, J., & Shimbo, M
(2006) Spectral properties of Japanese whispered vowels referred to pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 3378. 
 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lass, N.J., Hughes, K.R., Bowyer, M.D., Waters, L.T., & Bourne, V.T
(1976) Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 675–678. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., & Samuel, A.G
(2004) Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when F0 is neutralized. Language and Speech, 47, 109–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer–Eppler, W
(1957) Realization of prosodic features in whispered speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 19, 104–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.D
(1961) Word tone recognition in Vietnamese whispered speech. Word, 17, 11–15.Google Scholar
Monoson, P., & Zemlin, W.R
(1984) Quantitative study of whisper. Folia Phoniatrica, 36, 53–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mooshammer, C
(2010) Acoustic and laryngographic measures of the laryngeal reflexes of linguistic and vocal effort in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 1047–1058. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, O
(2008) Coding of intonational meanings beyond F0: Evidence from utterance–final /t/ aspiration in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 1252–1263. 
 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, J.F
(1938) The perception of subjective tones. Proceedings of the ‘Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie voor Wetenschappen’, 41, 1086–1093.Google Scholar
Singh, P.G., & Hirsh, I.J
(1992) Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 2650–2661. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sluijter, A., & Van Heuven, V.J
(1996) Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2471–2485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tartter, V.C., & Braun, D
(1994) Hearing smiles and frowns in normal and whisper registers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2101–2107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traunmüller, H., & Eriksson, A
(2010) Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 1014–1030.Google Scholar
Uchanski, R.M
(2008) Clear speech. In D.B. Pisoni, & R.E. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 207–235). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Heuven, V.J., & Haan, J
(2000) Phonetic correlates of statement versus question intonation in Dutch. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, Modelling and Technology (pp. 119–144). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Temporal development of interrogativity cues in Dutch. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 61–86). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar