Article published in:
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 203–217

Do speakers try to distract attention from their speech errors? The prosody of self-repairs

| Utrecht University
Self-repairs of segmental speech errors come in two varieties: repairs of early and of late-detected errors. Early-detected errors are detected in inner, late detected errors in overt speech. Late-detected errors are those in which the word or phrase containing the error is completed before the repair is made. We made acoustic measurements of both the reparandum and the repair, and also ran a loudness judgment experiment on pairs of CV fragments excised from reparandum and repair. Repairs of early-detected errors but not of latedetected errors had shorter durations, higher intensity, pitch and subjective loudness than those from the corresponding reparandums. It is concluded that speakers tend to distract the listeners’ attention from early but not from latedetected errors.
Published online: 10 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.189.17noo
References
Baars, B.J., Motley, M.T., & MacKay, D.G
(1975) Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R.H
(2011) languageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 1.4.Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., & Bates, D.M
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B
(2013) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2. Retrievable from http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=lme4.
Blackmer, E.R., & Mitton, J.L
(1991) Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech. Cognition, 39, 173–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D
(2009) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05) [Computer program]. Retrievable from http://​www​.praat​.org/
Canty, A., & Ripley, B
(2013) Boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions.R package version 1.3-9.Google Scholar
Cutler, A
(1983) Speaker’s conceptions of the functions of prosody. In A. Cutler & D.R. Ladd (Eds.), Prosody: Models and measurements (pp. 79–91). Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davison, A.C., & Hinkley, D.V
(1997) Bootstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernestus, M
(2000) Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch: A corpus-based study of the phonology-phonetics interface. PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Goffman, E
(1981) Radio talk. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Forms of talk (pp. 197–327). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Humphreys, K
(2002) Lexical bias in speech errors. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Levelt, W.J.M
(1983) Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M., & Cutler, A
(1983) Prosodic marking in speech repair. Journal of Semantics, 2, 205-217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nooteboom, S.G
(1980) Speaking and unspeaking: Detection and correction of phonological and lexical errors in spontaneous speech. In V.A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand (pp. 87–95). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2005a) Listening to one-self: Monitoring speech production. In R. Hartsuiker, Y. Bastiaanse, A. Postma, & F. Wijnen (Eds.), Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 167–186). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
(2005b) Lexical bias revisited: Detecting, rejecting and repairing speech errors in inner speech. Speech Communication, 47(1–2), 43–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Monitoring for speech errors has different functions in inner and overt speech. In M. Everaert, T. Lentz, H. De Mulder, A. Nilsen, & A. Zondervan (Eds.), The linguistic enterprise: From knowledge of language to knowledge in linguistics (pp. 213–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nooteboom, S.G., & Quené, H
(2008) Self-monitoring and feedback: A new attempt to find the main cause of lexical bias in phonological speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 837–861. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013a) Heft lemisphere: Exchanges predominate in segmental speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 26–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013b) Parallels between self-monitoring for speech errors and identification of the misspoken segments. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 417–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plug, L
(2011) Phonetic reduction and informational redundancy in self-initiated self-repair in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 299–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quené, H., & Van den Bergh, H
(2004) On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: a tutorial. Speech Communication, 43, 103–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (
2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrievable from http://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Seyfeddinipur, M., Kita, S., & Indefrey, P
(2008) How speakers interrupt themselves in managing problems in speaking: Evidence from self-repairs. Cognition, 108, 837–842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S
(1987) The role of word onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processes of language (pp. 17–51). Hillsdale (New Jersey)/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Cutler, A
(1999) The prosody of speech error corrections revisited. In J.J. Ohala, Y. Hasegawa, M. Ohala, D. Granville, & A.C. Bailey (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1483–1486). University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A.M.C., & Van Heuven, V.J
(1996) Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2471–2485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Heuven, V.J., & Sluijter, A.M.C.
(1996) Notes on the phonetics of word prosody. In R.W.N. Goedemans, H.G. Van der Hulst, & E. Visch (Eds.), Stress patterns of the world: Part 1: Background (pp. 233–269). HIL Publications 2. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar