Cover not available
Part of
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 323–349

The Laryngeal Class in RcvP and Voice phenomena in Dutch

This article proposes a system for representing phonation distinction in consonants within Radical CV Phonology (RCVP), a dependency-based model that uses unary “features” (called elements). The RCVP model is briefly outlined. The proposal for phonation distinction is compared to traditional binary systems and other unary proposals in the context of Government Phonology. The model is applied to phonation distinctions in Dutch, English and French which has traditionally been claimed to have different analyses. RCVP proposes a more unified analysis that uses the notion of enhancement. This article pays specific attention to voicing phenomena in Dutch (final devoicing, progressive and regressive voice assimilation) to illustrate and motivate certain aspects of the proposed system.

Published online: 10 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.189.26hul
References
Ahn, S., & Iverson, G
(2004) Dimensions in Korean laryngeal phonology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, 345–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.M., & Ewen, C.J
(1987) Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avery, P
(1996) The representation of voicing contrasts. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Avery, P., & Idsardi, W
(2001) Laryngeal dimensions, completion and enhancement. In T.A. Hall (Ed.), Distinctive Feature Theory (pp. 41–70). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Backley, P
(2011) An introduction to element theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Z
(1991) On the nature of tone. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Brink, D
(1978) Voice assimilation in Dutch: Some refinements. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 16(1), 11–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brockhaus, W
(1991) Final devoicing and neutralisation. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 303–330.Google Scholar
(1995) Final devoicing in the phonology of German. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles-Luce, J
(1985) Word-final devoicing in German: Effects of phonetic and sentential contexts. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 187–190.Google Scholar
Charles-Luce, J., & Dinnsen, D
(1987) A reanalysis of Catalan devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 187–190.Google Scholar
Cho, Y.Y
(1990) A typology of voicing assimilation. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 9, 141–155.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N
(1985) The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook, 2, 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cyran, E
2014). Between phonology and phonetics: Polish voicing. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logo
Dinnsen, D.A
(1985) Re-examination of phonological neutralization. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 265–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dinnsen, D.A., & Charles-Luce, J
(1984) Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 49–60.Google Scholar
Dresher, E., & van der Hulst, H
(1998) Head-dependency in phonology: Complexity and visibility. Phonology, 15, 317–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, S
(1990). A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. PhD dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ernestus, M
(2000) Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch: A corpus-based study of the phonology-phonetics interface. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fourakis, M., & Iverson, G.K
(1984) On the “incomplete neutralization” of German final obstruents. Phonetica, 41, 140–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, M
(2000) Turbid output representations and the unity of opacity. In M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall, & J-Y. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 30 (pp. 231–246). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Gordon, M
(1998) The phonetics and phonology of non-modal vowels: A crosslinguistic perspective. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 24, 93–105.Google Scholar
Gordon, M., & Ladefoged, P
(2001) Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Stevens, K.N
(1971) A note on laryngeal features. MIT Quarterly Progress Report, 101, 198–212.Also in M. Halle (Ed.) (2002) From memory to speech and back: Papers on phonetics and phonology, 1954–2002 (pp. 45–61). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Harris, J
(1994) English sound structure. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
(2009) Why final devoicing is weakening. In K. Nasukawa, & P. Backley (Eds.), Strength relations in phonology (pp. 9–46). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haynie, H.J
(2012) The linguistic geography of the Sierra Nevada and Central California. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Helgason, P., & Ringen, C
(2008) Voicing and aspiration in Swedish stops. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 607–628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, P
(2002) Germanic obstruent lenition: Some mutual implications of theoretical and historical phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Hubers, G., & Kooij, J
(1973) Voice assimilation in Dutch. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 14(1), 25–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, G., & Salmons, J
(1995) Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology, 12, 369–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, G.K., & Salmons, J.C
(2003) Laryngeal enhancement in early Germanic. Phonology, 20, 43–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jansen, W
(2004) Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. PhD dissertation, Universiteit van Groningen.Google Scholar
(2007) Dutch regressive voicing assimilation as a “low level phonetic process”. In J. van de Weijer & E.J. van der Torre (Eds.), Voicing in Dutch: (De)voicing – phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics (pp. 125–151). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jassem, W., & Richter, L
(1989) Neutralization of voicing in Polish obstruents. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 317–325.Google Scholar
Keating, P
(1984) Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60, 286–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehrein, W., & Golston, C
(2004) A prosodic theory of laryngeal contrasts. Phonology, 21, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, M
(1994) Generative phonology. Cambridge, MA, Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kohler, K
undated). Neutralization?! The phonetics – phonology issue in the analysis of word-final obstruent voicing. [URL]
Ladefoged, P
(1973) Features of the larynx. Journal of Phonetics, 1, 73–83.Google Scholar
Lass, R
(1984) Phonology: An introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A
(1964) A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar
Lombardi, L
(1991) Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Published (1994), New York: Garland.]Google Scholar
(1995a) Laryngeal neutralization and syllable well-formedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995b) Laryngeal features and privativity. The Linguistic Review, 12, 35–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, J
(1968) A case of assimilation in Modern Dutch. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 11, 123–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, B
(2012) Feature patterns: Their sources and status in grammar and reconstruction. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Dell, M., & Port, R
(1983) Discrimination of word-final voicing in German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, S31, N17.Google Scholar
Port, R., & Crawford, P
(1989) Incomplete neutralization and pragmatics in German. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 257–282.Google Scholar
Port, R., Mitleb, F., & O’Dell, M
(1981) Neutralization of voicing in German is incomplete. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, Supl. 1, S.13.Google Scholar
Port, R., & O’Dell, M
(1985) Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 455–471.Google Scholar
Rubach, J
(1996) Nonsyllabic analysis of voice assimilation in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 69–110.Google Scholar
Salting, D
(2005) The geometry of harmony. In M. van Oostendorp & J.M. van de Weijer (Eds.), The internal organization of phonological segments (pp. 93–120). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherrington, C
(1947) The integrative action of the nervous system (Second edition). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Slis, I.H
(1986) Assimilation of voice in Dutch as a function of stress, word boundaries and sex of speaker and listener. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 311–326.Google Scholar
Slowiaczek, L.M., & Dinnsen, D.A
(1985) On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 325–341.Google Scholar
Stevens, K.N., Keyser, S., & Kawasaki, H
(1986) Toward a phonetic theory of redundant features. In J. Perkell & D. Klatt (Eds.), Symposium on invariance and variability of speech processes (pp. 426–463). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.Google Scholar
Stevens, K.N., & Keyser, S.J
(1989) Primary features and their enhancement in consonants. Language, 65, 81–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tops, G
(1974) Assimilation of voice in Dutch: A generative approach. Leuvense Bijdragen, 63, 143–151.Google Scholar
Trommelen, M., & Zonneveld, W
(1979) Inleiding in de Generatieve Fonologie. Muiderberg: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, H
(1979) Assimilatie in obstruent clusters in het Nederlands [Assimilation in obstruent clusters in Dutch]. Ms. Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie.
(1980) On the formulation of phonological rules. In S. Daalder, & M. Gerritsen (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1980 (pp. 10–19). Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
(2005) The molecular structure of phonological segments. In P. Carr, J. Durand, & C. Ewen (Eds.), Headhood, elements, specification and contrastivity (pp. 193–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Final Devoicing – Tertium datur (tamen forsitan non necessarius). Talk at a Workshop on phonological voicing variation. Amsterdam/Leiden, September 11, 2008.
to appear). The Opponent Principle in RcvP: Binarity in a Unary System. In E. Raimy, & C. Cairns (Eds.) The segment in phonetics and phonology Malden, MA & Oxford Wiley-Blackwell
in preparation). Principles of Radical CV Phonology. Ms. University of Connecticut.
Van der Hulst, H., & Kooij, J.G
(1981) On the direction of assimilation rules. In W.U. Dressler, O.E. Pfeiffer, & J.R. Rennison (Eds.), Phonologica 1980 (pp. 209–214). Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Van der Hulst, H., & Ritter, N
(2000) No sympathy for opacity. In S. Billings, & A. Griffith (Eds.), The main session [CLS 35] (pp. 153–173). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Van Oostendorp, M
(2008) Incomplete devoicing in formal phonology. Lingua, 118, 1362–1374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaux, B
(1998) The laryngeal specifications of fricatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 497–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetzels, W.L., & Mascaró, J
(2001) The typology of voicing and devoicing. Language, 77, 207–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, M
(1980) The tonal phonology of Chinese. PhD dissertation, Massachussetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, W
(2007) Issues in Dutch devoicing: Positional faithfulness, positional markedness and local conjunction. In J. van de Weijer & E.J. van der Torre (Eds.), Voicing in Dutch: (De)voicing – phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics (pp. 1–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Cyran, Eugeniusz
2017. Hocus bogus?. In Sonic Signatures [Language Faculty and Beyond, 14], ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Huszthy, Bálint
2021. Italian preconsonantal s-voicing is not regressive voice assimilation. The Linguistic Review 38:1 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Schwartz, Geoffrey & Ewelina Wojtkowiak
2024. Asymmetrical Equivalence Classification – Cluster Affrication vs. Lenis Stops in the Speech of Polish Learners of English. Research in Language 21:4 ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
van der Hulst, Harry
2017. Deconstructing tongue root harmony systems. In Sonic Signatures [Language Faculty and Beyond, 14], ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
van der Hulst, Harry
2018. Asymmetries in Vowel Harmony, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.