Cover not available
Part of
Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental linguistics and phonetics
Edited by Johanneke Caspers, Yiya Chen, Willemijn Heeren, Jos Pacilly, Niels O. Schiller and Ellen van Zanten
[Not in series 189] 2014
► pp. 350–358

Affricates in English as a natural class

This paper investigates the role of affricates in the phonotactics of English, and notes that these segments behave differently from stops and differently from fricatives. This is taken as evidence against the proposal that affricates cannot form a natural class by themselves, which is inherent in the so-called “Stop Approach” to the representation of affricates. Two other cases from the literature, from Pengo and Cimbrian German, provide additional evidence against this approach.
Published online: 10 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.189.27wei
References (23)
References
Berns, J. (2013). Friction between phonetics and phonology: The status of affricates. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Burrow, T., & Bhattacharya, S. (1970). The Pengo language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1974). Phonological features: Problems and proposals. Language, 50(1), 52–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology, 2, 225–252. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1987). Phonological feature representation and the description of intrusive stops. In A. Bosch, B. Need, & E. Schiller (Eds.), Papers from the 23rd Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part Two: Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology (pp. 29–50). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N., & Hume, E.V. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 245–306). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davis, S. (1989). The location of the feature [continuant] in feature geometry. Lingua, 78(1), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fouché, P. (1958). Phonétique historique du français [Historical phonetics of French]. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47(1), 27–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, T.A. (2012). The representation of affricates in Cimbrian German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 24(01), 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, A.A. (1958). Introduction to English structures. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, G., & Halle, M. (1967). Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates. Second Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kehrein, W. (2002). Phonological representation and phonetic phasing: Affricates and laryngeals. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. (1997). The phonological representation of affricates: Evidence from Korean and other languages. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Cornell, Ithaka, NY.Google Scholar
Lin, Y.-H. (2011). Affricates. In M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume, & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Vol. 1 (pp. 367–390).London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lombardi, L. (1990). The nonlinear organization of the affricate. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 8, 375–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993 [2004]). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sagey, E.C. (1986). The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.R. (1994). English in Wales. In R. Burchfield (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Vol.5: English in Britain and overseas: Origin and development (pp. 94–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Weijer, J.M. (1996). Segmental structure and complex segments. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. (2011). Secondary and double articulation. In M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume, & K.D. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Vol. 1 (pp. 694–710). London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van de Weijer, J.M., & Hinskens, F. (2004). On segmental complexity: Affricates and patterns of segmental modification in consonant inventories. In L. Cornips, & J. Doetjes (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2004 (pp. 217–228). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Elhija Mahajna, Dua'a Abu & Stuart Davis
2016. On the status of derived affricates in Arabic dialects. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVIII [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.