Article published in:
Writing(s) at the Crossroads: The process–product interface
Edited by Georgeta Cislaru
[Not in series 194] 2015
► pp. 3354
Abbott, Robert D., Dagmar Amtmann, and Jeff Munson
2006 “Statistical analysis for field experiments and longitudinal data in writing research.” In Handbook of Writing Research, ed. by Charles A. MacArthur, Steve Graham, and Jill Fitzgerald, 374–385. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Alatis, James E., Heidi E. Hamilton, and Ai-Hui Tan
(Eds.) 2002Linguistics, Language and the Professions. Education, Journalism, Law, Medicine, and Technology. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar
Antos, Gerd
1989 “Textproduktion. Ein einführender Überblick.” In Textproduktion. Ein interdisziplinärer Forschungsüberblick, ed. by Gerd Antos, and Hans Peter Krings, 5–57. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
1991The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bisaillon, Jocelyne
2007 “Professional editing strategies used by six editors.” Written Communication 24(4): 295–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bracewell, Robert J
2003 “Tasks, ensembles, and activity. Linkages between text production and situation of use in the workplace.” Written Communication 20(4): 511–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Camps, Joaquim
2003 “Concurrent and retrospective verbal reports as tools to better understand the role of attention in second language tasks.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13(2): 201–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Candlin, Sally
2003 “Issues arising when the professional workplace is the site of applied linguistic research.” Applied Linguistics 24(3): 386–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Elaine
1994a “Ethnographic interviews and writing research. A critical examination of the methodology.” In Speaking About Writing. Reflections on Research Methodology, ed. by Peter Smagorinsky, 247–272. Thousand Oaks et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
1994b “Redefining “contextin research on writing.” Written Communication 11(4): 445–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron Victor
2003 “On contextualizing applied linguistic research in the workplace.” Applied Linguistics 24(3): 360–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Guy
2003Applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cottle, Simon
1998 “Participant observation: Researching news production.” In Mass Communication Research Methods, ed. by Andres Hansen, Simon Cottle, Chris Newbold, and Ralph Negrine, 25–65. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
de Biasi, Pierre-Marc
2011Génétique des textes. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Degenhardt, Marion
2006CAMTASIA and CATMOVIE. “Two digital tools for observing, documenting and analysing writing processes of university students.” In Writing and Digital media, ed. by Luuk Van Waes, Mariëlle Leijten, and Christine M. Neuwirth, 180–186. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen, and Daniel Perrin
2009 “Capturing translation processes to access metalinguistic awareness.” Across Languages and Cultures 10(2): 275–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats
2001 “Politicians interviewed on television news.” Discourse & Society 12(5): 563–584. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, Ken A., and Herbert A. Simon
1984Protocol Analysis. Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993Protocol Analysis. Verbal Reports as Data. (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fang, Irving
1991Writing Style Differences in Newspaper, Radio and Television News. Minnesota: Center for Interdisciplinary Studies of Writing, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Ferrer, Daniel
2011Logiques du brouillon. Modèles pour une critique génétique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Flinn, Jane Z
1987 “Case studies of revision aided by keystroke recording and replaying software.” Computers and Composition 5(1): 31–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gnach, Aleksandra, Esther Wiesner, Andrea Bertschi-Kaufmann, and Daniel Perrin
2007 “Children’s writing processes when using computers. Insights based on combining analyses of product and process.” Research in Comparative and International Education 2(1): 13–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Gravengaard, Gitte
2012 “The metaphors journalists live by. Journalists’ conceptualisation of newswork.” Journalism 2012(13): 1064–1082. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Stuart, and Lorraine Higgins
1994 ““Once upon a time”: The use of retrospective accounts in building theory in composition.” In Speaking About Writing. Reflections on Research Methodology, ed. by Peter Smagorinsky, 115–140. Thousand Oaks et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth
1987 “Wege und Irrwege. Zu Heines Gedicht “Lebensfahrt”.” In Literarische Schreibprozesse [Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik], ed. by Brigitte Schlieben-Lange, and Almuth Grésillon, 84–103. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
1994Eléments de critique génétique. Lire les manuscrits modernes. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
1997 “Slow: work in progress.” Word & Image 13(2): 106–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Langage de l’ébauche. Parole intérieure extériorisée.” Langages 147: 19–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) 2008aLa Mise en œuvre. Itinéraires génétiques. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
2008b “Lire pour écrire.” In La Mise en œuvre. Itinéraires génétiques, ed. by Almuth Grésillon, 67–81. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
2008c “Ponge: «L’Ardoise» dans tous ses états.” In La Mise en œuvre. Itinéraires génétiques, ed. by Almuth Grésillon, 207–241. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
2014 “Erfahrungen mit Textgenese, Critique génétique und Interpretation.” In Text – Material – Medium. Zur Relevanz editorischer Dokumentationen für die literaturwissenschaftliche Interpretation, ed. by Wolfgang Lukas, Rüdiger Nutt-Kofoth, and Madleen Podewski, 66–79. Berlin et al.: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth, and Jean-Louis Lebrave
2008 “Linguistique et génétique des textes. Un décalogue.” Le Français moderne [Numéro spécial publié à l’occasion de son 75e anniversaire]: 37–49.Google Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth, Jean-Louis Lebrave, and Catherine Fuchs
1991 “«Ruminer Hérodias». Du cognitif-visuel au verbal-textuel.” In L’écriture et ses doubles. Genèse et variation textuelle, ed. by Daniel Ferrer, and Jean-Louis Lebrave, 27–109. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth, and Marie-Madeleine Mervant-Roux
2010 “Marguerite Duras/Claude Régy. «L’amante anglaise». Genèse d’une écriture, gésine d’un théâtre.” In Genèses théâtrales, ed. by Almuth Grésillon, Marie-Madeleine Mervant-Roux, and Dominique Budor, 211–232. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
Hanauer, David Ian, and Karen Englander
2013Scientific Writing in a Second Language. Anderson: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Gyde
2006 “Retrospection methods in translator training and translation research.” Journal of Specialised Translation 5: 2–40.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Jürg
2007 “Zugespieltes Material. Der O-Ton und seine Interpretation.” In Original/Ton. Zur Mediengeschichte des O-Tons, ed. by Harun Maye, Cornelius Reiber, and Nikolaus Wegmann, 25–50. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Hay, Louis
2002La littérature des écrivains. Questions de critique génétique. Paris: Corti.Google Scholar
Herschberg Pierrot, Anne
1994 “Les notes de Proust.” Genesis 6: 61–78.Google Scholar
Keseling, Gisbert
1992 “Pause and intonation contours in written and oral discourse.” In Cooperating With Written Texts. The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, ed. by Dieter Stein, 31–66. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klemm, Michael
2000Zuschauerkommunikation. Formen und Funktionen der alltäglichen kommunikativen Fernsehaneignung. Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
Kollberg, Py, and Kerstin Severinson-Eklundh
2002 “Studying writers’ revising patterns with S-notation analysis.” In Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Studying Writing, ed. by C. Michael Levy, and Thierry Olive, 89–104. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika
2004 “Businesswomen and war metaphors: “Possessive, jealous and pugnacious”?Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(1): 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krings, Hans Peter
1992 “Schwarze Spuren auf weißem Grund. Fragen, Methoden und Ergebnisse der empirischen Schreibprozeßforschung im Überblick.” In Textproduktion. Neue Wege der Forschung, ed. by Hans Peter Krings, and Gerd Antos, 45–110. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Lams, Lutgard
2011 “Newspapers’ narratives based on wire stories. Facsimiles of input?Journal of Pragmatics 43(7): 1853–1864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lebrave, Jean-Louis
1987 “Lecture et analyse des brouillons.” Langages 69: 11–23.Google Scholar
1992 “La critique génétique. Une discipline nouvelle ou un avatar moderne de la philologie?Genesis 1: 33–72.Google Scholar
Levin, Tamar, and Till Wagner
2006 “In their own words: Understanding student conceptions of writing through their spontaneous metaphors in the science classroom.” Instructional Science 34(3): 227–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levy, C. Michael, Pamela J. Marek, and Joseph Lea
1996 “Concurrent and retrospective protocols in writing research.” In Theories, Models and Methodology in Writing Research, ed. by Gert Rijlaarsdam, Huub Van den Bergh, and Michael Couzijn, 542–556. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, C. Michael, and Sarah Ransdell
1996 “Writing signatures.” In The Science of Writing. Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michael Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 127–148. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lillis, Theresa
2008 “Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”. Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research.” Written Communication 25(3): 353–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, Eva, and Kirk Sullivan
2006 “Analysing online revision.” In Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing. Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 157–188. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Litosselity, Lia
(Ed.) 2009Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Luginbühl, Martin, Thomas Baumberger, Kathrine Schwab, and Harald Burger
2002Medientexte zwischen Autor und Publikum. Intertextualität in Presse, Radio und Fernsehen. Zürich: Seismo.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Stuart
2012 “The promise of ecological inquiry in writing research.” TechnicalCommunication Quarterly 21(4): 346–361.Google Scholar
Mahrer, Rudolf
2006 “Quand Ramuz remonte le courant. Réécriture des romans en vue des œuvres complètes.” Genesis 27: 59–72.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael
2001Issues in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L
2005 “Discourse and metadiscourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 37(9): 1323–1324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Daniel
2003 “Progression analysis (PA). Investigating writing strategies at the workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(6): 907–921. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Medienlinguistik (2 ed.). Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
2012 “La voie tranquille. Routine und Emergenz in Formulierungsprozessen als service public.” In Schreib- und Textroutinen. Theorie, Erwerb und didaktisch-mediale Modellierung, ed. by Helmuth Feilke, and Katrin Lehnen, 215–239. Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
2013The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam, New York et al.: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, Daniel, and Marc Wildi
2010 “Statistical modeling of writing processes.” In Traditions of Writing Research, ed. by Charles Bazerman, 378–393. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peterson, Mark Allen
2001 “Getting to the story. Unwriteable discourse and interpretive practice in American journalism.” Anthropological Quarterly 74(4): 201–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quandt, Thorsten
2008 “News tuning and content management. An observation study of old and new routines in German online newsrooms.” In Making Online News. The Ethnography of New Media Production, ed. by Chris Paterson, and David Domingo, 77–97. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Robinson, Sue
2009 “A chronicle of chaos. Tracking the news story of hurricane Katrina from The Times-Picayune to its website.” Journalism 10(4): 431–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted, and Carel Van Wijk
1996 “Text analysis as a research tool. How hierarchical text structure contributes to the understanding of conceptual processes in writing.” In The Science of Writing. Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michael Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 251–270. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schindler, Kirsten, and Joanna Wolfe
2014 “Beyond single authors. Organizational text production as collaborative writing.” In Handbook of Writing and Text Production, Vol. 10, ed. by Daniel Perrin, and Eva-Maria Jakobs, 159–173. New York et al.: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Barbara
2002 “Theorizing structure and agency in workplace writing. An ethnomethodological approach.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication> 16(2): 170–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Katherine
2006 “Qualitative research on writing.” In Handbook of Writing Research, ed. by Charles A. MacArthur, Steve Graham, and Jill Fitzgerald, 357–373. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Severinson-Eklundh, Kerstin, and Py Kollberg
1996 “Computer tools for tracing the writing process. From keystroke records to S-notation.” In Current Research in Writing. Theories, Models and Methodology, ed. by Gert Rijlaarsdam, Huub Van den Bergh, and Michael Couzijn, 526–541. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Severinson-Eklundh, Kerstin, and Carin Sjöholm
1991 “Writing with a computer: a longitudinal study of writers of technical documents.” Man-Machine Studies 35: 723–749. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Mary Lourdes
2012 “Camtasia in the classroom. Student attitudes and preferences for video commentary or Microsoft Word comments during the revision process.” Computers and Composition 29(1): 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sleurs, Kim, Jacobs, Geert, and Luuk Van Waes
2003 “Constructing press releases, constructing quotations: A case study.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(2): 135–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, Peter
2001 “Rethinking protocol analysis from a cultural perspective.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 21: 233–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) 1994Speaking About Writing. Reflections on Research Methodology. Thousand Oaks et al.: Sage.Google Scholar
Spelman Miller, Kristvan
2006a “Keystroke logging. An introduction.” In Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing. Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 1–9. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2006b “The pausological study of written language production.” In Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing. Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 11–30. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, Sven, Kenneth Holmqvist, Victoria Johansson, Henrik Karlsson, and Åsa Wengelin
2006 “What key-logging can reveal about writing.” In Computer Keystroke Logging and Writing. Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 45–72. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
1997 “Critical comments on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).” In Evolving Models of Language, ed. by Ann Ryan, and Alison Wray, 100–116. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Patricia, and James E. Porter
1993 “On theory, practice, and method. Toward a heuristic research methodology for professional writing.” In Writing in the Workplace. New Research Perspectives, ed. by Rachel Spilka, 220–237. Carbondale et al.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, Abbas, and Charles Teddlie
2003 “Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in social and behavioral research.” In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, ed. by Abbas Tashakkori, and Charles Teddlie, 3–50. Thousend Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, Huub, and Gert Rijlaarsdam
1996 “The dynamics of composing. Modeling writing process data.” In The Science of Writing. Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michael Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 207–232. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van der Geest, Thea
1996 “Studying “real life” writing processes. A proposal and an example.” In The Science of Writing. Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michael Levy, and Sarah Ransdell, 309–322. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A
1988News Analysis. Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale/London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA. A plea for diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. Los Angeles: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Hout, Tom, and Geert Jacobs
2008 “News production theory and practice. Fieldwork notes on power, interaction and agency.” Pragmatics 18(1): 59–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Waes, Luuk, and Anne Mangen
2012 “Introduction. Tools for studying and supporting writing. Technological advances in writing research.” In Learning to Write Effectively. Current Trends in European Research, ed. by Mark Torrance, Denis Alamargot, Montserrat Castello, Franck Ganier, Otto Kruse, Anne Mangen, Liliana Tolchinsky, and Luuk Van Waes, 345–351. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Van Waes, Luuk, and Liesbet Van Herreweghe
1995 “Computerprotokolle in der Schreibprozessforschung. Der Gebrauch von Keytrap als Beobachtungsinstrument.” In Wissenschaftliche Textproduktion. Mit und ohne Computer, ed. by Eva-Maria Jakobs, Dagmar Knorr, and Sylvie Molitor-Lübbert, 35–51. Frankfurt am Main et al.: Lang.Google Scholar
Wei, Li
2007 “A user-friendly linguistics.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17(1): 117–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werlen, Iwar
2000 ““Zum Schluss das Wetter”. Struktur und Variation von Wetterberichten im Rundfunk.” In Sprachsplitter und Sprachspiele, ed. by Jürg Niederhauser, and Stanislaw Szlek, 155–170. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Whithaus, Carl, Scott B. Harrison, and Jeb Midyette
2008 “Keyboarding compared with handwriting on a high-stakes writing assessment. Student choice of composing medium, raters’ perceptions, and text quality.” Assessing Writing 13(1): 4–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G
2000 “On the limitations of linguistics applied.” Applied Linguistics 21(1): 3–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Joanna
2005 “Gesture and collaborative planning. A case study of a student writing group.” Written Communication 22(3): 298–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, Claire M
2009 “Meeting the mixed methods challenge of integration in a sociological study of structure and agency.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3(1): 7–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Bu, and John E. Newhagen
2009 “How journalists think while they write. A transcultural model of news decision making.” Journal of Communication 59(3): 587–608. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Manchón, Rosa M.
2021.  In Ethnographies of Academic Writing Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1],  pp. 84 ff. Crossref logo
Schneier, Joel
2021. Digital Articulation: Examining Text-Based Linguistic Performances in Mobile Communication Through Keystroke-Logging Analysis. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 november 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.