Cover not available
Part of
Writing(s) at the Crossroads: The process–product interface
Edited by Georgeta Cislaru
[Not in series 194] 2015
► pp. 57–80

The instrumental use of verbless sentences in writing and rewriting

A longitudinal and genre-contrasted point of view

| CLESTHIA, University Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3
| CLESTHIA, University Sorbonne nouvelle Paris 3
We sought to determine the role of verbless sentences across the writing process. We compared two corpora: a longitudinal corpus of social reports and a transversal corpus of diary entries and letters. An examination of successive draft reports revealed that verbless sentences were present in incipient versions, but subsequently grew into verbal sentences or even paragraphs. They served as reminders condensed syntactic and semantic content intended to be expanded into full text. Similarly, verbless sentences contained in the diary entries were swiftly worked up into full sentences in letters relating the same events as the diary. We hypothesize the existence of a pragmatic constraint differentiating between self-addressed texts (incipient versions, personal diaries) and other-addressed texts (final reports, letters).
Keywords: diary, letters, rewriting, social reports, verbless sentences
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 5 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/z.194.04cis
References (26)
References
Bach, Ulrich. 1992. “From private writing to public oration: The case of Puritan wills. Cognitive discourse analysis applied to the study of genre change.” In Cooperating with Written Texts. The Pragmatics and Comprehension of Written Texts, ed. by Dieter Stein, 417–436. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, David, and Nigel Hall. 2000. “Introduction.” In Letter Writing as a Social Practice, ed. by David Barton, and Nigel Hall, 1–14. Asterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behr, Irmtraud. 2011. “Etude d’énoncé averbal à un terme: entre grammaire et discours.” In Les énoncés averbaux autonomes entre grammaire et discours, ed. by Florence Lefeuvre, and Irmtraud Behr, 239–252. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. “La phrase nominale.” In Problèmes de linguistique générale I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Cislaru, Georgeta. 2014. “Contraintes linguistiques et contextuelles dans la production écrite.” Les Carnets du Cediscor 12: 55–74.Google Scholar
Delorme, Benjamin. 2004. Les énoncés nominaux dans la fiction contemporaine de langue anglaise, implications sémantiques et pragmatiques de la prédication averbale. Paris 4 Sorbonne: Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Eid, Mushira. 1991. “Verbless Sentences in Arabic and Hebrew.” In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics III. Papers From the Third Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, ed. by Bernard Comrie, and Mushira Eid, 31–61. Amsterdam ‑ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine, Almuth Gresillon, Jean-Louis Lebrave, Jean Peytard, and Josette Rey-Debove. (Eds.). 1987 [1982]. Genèse du texte: les modèles linguistiques. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Grinshpun, Yana. 2011. “Phrase averbale et presse écrite: le cas des constructions en [UN+N+expansion].” In Les énoncés averbaux autonomes entre grammaire et discours, ed. by Florence Lefeuvre, and Irmtraud Behr, 187–203. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-Verbal Predication. Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huyette, Michel, and Philippe Desloges. 2009 [1997]. Guide de la protection judiciaire de l’enfant – Cadre juridique, pratiques éducatives, enjeux pour les familles. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalizations. London ‑ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lardilleux, Adrien, Serge Fleury, and Georgeta Cislaru. 2013. “Allongos: Longitudinal Alignment for the Genetic Study of Writers’ Drafts.” In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing LNCS 7817, 537–548. Berlin: Springer. DOI logo
Lefeuvre, Florence. 1999. La phrase averbale en français. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Le prédicat nominal dans les articles de presse.” Syntaxe et Sémantique 6: 181–198.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Le segment averbal comme unité syntaxique textuelle.” In Parcours de la phrase, Mélanges en l’honneur de Pierre Le Goffic, ed. by Michel Charolles, Nathalie Fournier, Catherine Fuchs, and Florence Lefeuvre, 143–158. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Les nominalisations prédicatives en discours.” In Le français moderne, special issue ed. by Véronique Magri-Mourgues: 126–145.Google Scholar
Leijten, Mariëlle, and Luuk Van Waes. 2006. “Inputlog: New Perspectives on the Logging of On-Line Writing.” In Studies in Writing: Vol. 18. Computer Key-Stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications, ed. by Kirk P.H. Sullivan, and Eva Lindgren, 73–94. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mahrer, Rudolf, and Valentine Nicollier Saraillon. 2014. “Les brouillons font-ils texte? Le cas des plans pré-rédactionnels de C. Ramuz.” In Faire Texte. Frontières textuelles et opérations de textualisation, ed. by Jean-Michel Adam, 223–305. Besançon: Annales littéraires de lUniversité de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2004. “Fragments and Ellipsis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6): 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Joanna. 1988. “Nominalization and Assertion in Scientific Russian Prose.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 399–428. Amsterdam ‑ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger Rachel, and Louisa Sadler. 2006. “Verbless Clauses: Revealing the Structure Within.” In Architectures, Rules and Preferences: A Festschrift for Joan Bresnan, ed. by Jane Grimshaw, Joan Maling, Chris Manning, Jane Simpson, and Annie Zaenen, 139–160. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. á[URL]Google Scholar
Plane, Sylvie, Thierry Olive, and Denis Alamargot (Eds.). 2010. “Traitement des contraintes de la production d’écrits: aspects linguistiques et psycholinguistiques.” Langages 177.Google Scholar
Prior, Paul. 2004. “Tracing Process: How Texts Come Into Being.” In What Writing Does and How It Does It. An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, ed. by Charles Bazerman, and Paul Prior, 167–200. Mahwah, NJ ‑ London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary J. 2007. “Grammar, the Sentence, and Traditions of Linguistic Analysis.” In Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text, ed. by Charles Bazerman, 673–691. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

[no author supplied]
2018. Références bibliographiques. In Le processus de textualisation [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.